1 / 22

USPHS Honor Awards

USPHS Honor Awards. The Basics of Awards Write-ups. Objective. To provide officers tools an understanding of importance of PHS Honor Awards To provide officers tools on writing awards. Agenda. Overview of PHS Awards Awards Approval Processes Basics of Writing Awards

keyanna
Download Presentation

USPHS Honor Awards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. USPHS Honor Awards The Basics of Awards Write-ups

  2. Objective • To provide officers tools an understanding of importance of PHS Honor Awards • To provide officers tools on writing awards

  3. Agenda • Overview of PHS Awards • Awards Approval Processes • Basics of Writing Awards • Awards and Career Planning

  4. Relevant Documents • PHS Commissioned Corps Awards, CCPM Pamphlet No. 67 - April 1998 http://dcp.psc.gov/PDF_docs/CCPM_P67.pdf • Commissioned Corps Instruction CC27.1.1http://dcp.psc.gov/eccis/documents/CCPM27_1_1.pdf • There are other relevant documents on the CCMIS website, but these are the most generally applicable • Sample Awards • http://www.usphs-scientist.org/documents/careerdev_content/cc_awards.pdf

  5. Agency Nomination Guidance • CDC Guidance on Writing Nominations • http://www.cdc.gov/od/occp/personnel/awards/guidelines_for_submission.htm • FDA Awards Nomination Process • http://intranet.fda.gov/ohrms/corps/awards/awards.htm • NIH Awards Nomination Process • http://hr.od.nih.gov/hrguidance/corps/awards/default.htm.

  6. Types of Awards • Honor Awards • Individual and Unit • General criteria, achievement/performance based • Officership achievements not usually included • Service Awards • Set criteria • Do not go through Agency awards boards • Campaign Medals • Training Awards • Regular Corps Ribbon • Special “addition” • With Valor

  7. Honor Awards • Individual Honor Awards • Six for which Corps officers may be nominated: DSM, MSM, OSM, CM, AM, CIT. • Agency may approve CIT, AM, CM, OSM • Two additional awards for which there is no nomination process: SGM and SGESM. • No order in which an officer must receive these awards. • Unit Honor Awards • Two (UC, OUC) • Agency may approve UC

  8. Importance • Recognition by the United States of your work • Demonstrates leadership/ability • Awards are tied to the promotion process http://dcp.psc.gov/PY2010.aspx • O4 (AM and below) • O5 (CM and below) • O6 (OSM and below) • Unit awards important, but individual honor awards are specifically denoted in the Benchmarks • Awards are worth the time and effort

  9. Individual Awards • Requirements • PHS 6342-2 • Two page narrative • General requirements • Vary by agency/awards board • # of copies • Signatures on the forms • Criteria for approval • Check with your liaison or your awards board coordinator to get details • Two general criteria • Level of achievement • Length of time

  10. Awards Criteria • CIT • Single achievement • Shorttime frame (1 week to a few months is typical) • AM • sustained above-average accomplishment, superior performance • 1-2 years is typical • CM • high quality achievements • application of unique skill • noteworthy technical and professional contributions that are significant to a limited area • 2 years time frame is typical • Usually Agency/state level impact

  11. Awards Criteria • OSM • continuous outstanding leadership • National level impact • Time frame is typically 2-4 years • MSM • Meritorious achievement • Usually a career wrap award • Time frame is typically many years • DSM • exceedingly high level of achievement • Often multi-national impact • Time frame is typically several years but varies

  12. The Narrative • Most important part of the award • Describes what you’ve done and WHY IT MATTERS • The hardest to write • Your audience may be very diverse in background • Anyone who reads it should understand what you’ve done • Clear, concise writing is critical • Limited to two pages, 1” margins • Suggested font Times New Roman (10.5-11 font)

  13. A Good Narrative • Citation • What you’ve been awarded for • Must match 6342 citation verbatim • Background • Short paragraph that provides the reader the setting of the award. • Body • 3-4 general sections describing broad achievements • General sections include accomplishments an impacts • Conclusion • VERY short section that reiterates that you are highly deserving of the award for what you’ve done

  14. Writing Style • Concise, clear • Sentences should be 1-2 lines long • Longer sentences are hard to follow • Time Anchors • Tells the reader how long it took to do the job • Use intermittently throughout • Avoid • Jargon (collaboration, consensus) • Praise language (enthusiastically, energetically) • Quantify • Numbers help readers understand the scale of effort • Bullets vs paragraph format • Find out which your board prefers

  15. Accomplishments • These are things that were done • First person, active verb • Include your specific role • What did you actually do (or lead) • Quantify when possible • For prolonged or extensive efforts • Use the phrase “For example,….” • Must be more than just doing your normal duty • Must have an impact associated with it • 13-month window following the end of the accomplishments to submit the award. • No overlap with previous awards.

  16. Impacts • THE BIG QUESTION—SO WHAT??? • Why are your accomplishments award-worthy • Every sentence should read or have implied • “As a result” • “Therefore” • “Because of” • Use numbers • How much reduction in morbidity/mortality • How much money saved • How many people trained • How much improvement made

  17. Common Problems • Accomplishments too vague • Not clear what you actually did • Praise language • Impacts not well described • Not clear why your work was important • Too technical • Awards boards usually have broad background • Mixed impacts/accomplishments • Obtaining funding, publishing is an accomplishment, is an accomplishment, not impact • Level of proposed award does not match accomplishments • May be downgraded (but sometimes is upgraded) • Overlap with previous awards (career wrap may be excepted)

  18. Effort • The officer should always be involved in the write-up • You know what you did and why it was important • Listen to your awards board coordinator • They know what will pass and what will not • Plan on 2-3 full days and several iterations • Spell check/grammar check

  19. The 6342 • Citation limited to 25 words • At least one supervisory signature • Check your agency’s procedures • Original signatures needed • Award may require secondary concurrence if work was under a different supervisor than your current one • Second page awards • No service/training awards

  20. Unit Awards • Same rules/principles apply • Same writing styles • Same do’s and don’ts • UC is agency level while OUC must be approved by CC Awards Board • Note that the form is 6342-1 (not 6342-2) • Separate 6342 page 2 for each officer on the team • Non PHS officers should be included • Listed on separate sheet • Coordinate with your Awards Board Liaison to determine your agency’s practices

  21. Awards and Career Planning • Know your benchmarks • Target the appropriate award level before you go up for promotion • Higher level awards require rolling together long periods of work • Know the importance of an award level relative to your career • A CM for an O-3 is great, but a CIT for an O-6 provides minimal bang for the buck • Continuity of awards • A Benchmark but does not mean you need a CIT, then AM, then CM • Unit Awards provide value as well • Get involved in team efforts

  22. Summary • Honor Awards are important to your career • Approval process varies • Work with your awards board liaison • Writing style of narrative is very important • Takes time, effort, but worth it • Develop an awards “strategy” as part of your career planning

More Related