interdependence between technology and governance cases and theories n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories. by Emanuele Lobina Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU) University of Greenwich, UK 21 March 2009.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories' - kenneth-douglas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
interdependence between technology and governance cases and theories
Interdependence between Technology and Governance: cases and theories


Emanuele Lobina

Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU)

University of Greenwich, UK

21 March 2009

Sustainable Water management Improves Tomorrow’s Cities’ HealthSWITCH, European Commission, 6th Framework Programme, 2006-2010, Contract No. 018530 (GOCE), Integrated Project.The findings are the responsibility of the author and should not be construed as representing the views of the European Commission.

research questions and theoretical framework
Research questions and theoretical framework
  • Why have we not yet moved to an integrated approach to urban water management?
  • Is the limiting factor technology or institutional frameworks (or a combination of both)?
  • Theories applied to the case of sewerage:
    • Knowledge theory (technological change)
    • Governance theory
    • Network theory
characterisation of sewerage as technology
Characterisation of sewerage as technology

Second generation technology

Implications: perceived social necessity is key to decision making (e.g. Sabesp/COBES in 1980s São Paulo)

Centralised system (“Victorian” technology)

Implications: adverse impact of localised solutions on public health and environment (e.g. Peru, Pakistan, Jakarta)

Highly capital intensive

Implications: affordability, subsidies, timescale of universal coverage (e.g. history of OECD countries, MDGs, donors’ policies)

knowledge and decision making
Knowledge and decision making
  • Moriarty et al. (2005: 11) define knowledge as “the intrinsic ability of individuals or groups to carry out actions”
  • Knowledge defined as the “awareness and understanding of facts, truths or information, gained in the form of experience or learning (a posteriori), or through introspection (a priori)”
  • Knowledge is part of the governance “equation” and reminds us that governance is a resource-dependent process
geodesic networks and inefficient knowledge transfer





Geodesic networks and inefficient knowledge transfer

E.g. PPWSA prior to 1993

definitions governance
Definitions: Governance
  • “Governance comprises the complex mechanisms, processes, and institutions through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, mediate their differences, and exercise their legal rights and obligations” (UNDP, 1997)
  • In mainstream literature, governance is presented as the articulation of management regimes and their institutional frameworks: the State, Market and Civil Society (Castro, 2003)
  • Is governance just another byword for politics and decision making? (Green, 2007)
  • Knowledge as part of the governance “equation”
the ideal type model of governance
The ideal-type model of governance …


(hierarchical order)


Adapted from Picciotto (1997), Castro (2003)

Civil society


Civil society (cooperation driven by voluntary association)

Market (self-organization driven by competition)

policy networks and state autonomy
Policy networks and state autonomy
  • Looks at inter-actor relationships in light of relative interests/objectives, available resources, applicable rules and existing constraints (Hermans, 2005; Klijn, 1997)
  • State and different levels of government recognised as carrying own and distinct interests (Smith, 1993)
  • Relationships vary in type (confrontational and transactional)
  • Criticised for not representing a theory of power, but it is a valuable analytical framework for testing the cogency of other theories, e.g. property rights and public choice, as it addresses both resources- and context-dependence (Lobina and Hall, 2007)
implications for iuwm
Implications for IUWM

What generation is IUWM?

What is the perceived social necessity of IUWM?

Centralised vs. localised systems

What is the impact of centralised/localised solutions in terms of PESTE sustainability?

What are the financial implications of moving to IUWM?

In terms of: affordability; trade offs between economic, social and environmental objectives; sources of funding

selected references
Selected References

Hall, D., Lobina, E. (2008) Sewerage Works – Public investment in sewers saves lives. PSIRU Reports, commissioned by UNISON and PSI, March 2008 (

Lobina, E., Hall, D. (2008) The comparative advantage of the public sector in the development of urban water supply, in Progress in Development Studies, 8(1), pp. 85-101.

Hall, D., Lobina, E. (2007) Profitability and the poor: Corporate strategies, innovation and sustainability, in Geoforum, 38(5), pp. 772-785.

Lobina, E., Hall, D. (2007) Experience with private sector participation in Grenoble, France and lessons on strengthening public water operations, in Utilities Policy, 15, pp. 93-109.