chapter 7 social process theories learning control and reaction n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Chapter 7 Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Chapter 7 Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 33

Chapter 7 Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 1240 Views
  • Uploaded on

Chapter 7 Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction. Criminology 8 th edition Larry J. Siegel. Social Process Theories. Theories which are based on the concept that an individual’s socialization determines the likelihood of criminality.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Chapter 7 Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction' - glynnis


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
chapter 7 social process theories learning control and reaction

Chapter 7Social Process Theories: Learning, Control and Reaction

Criminology 8th edition

Larry J. Siegel

© 2003 Wadsworth Publishing Co.

social process theories
Social Process Theories

Theories which are based on the concept

that an individual’s socialization

determines the likelihood of criminality.

According to social process theories,

all people, regardless of their race, class, or gender, have the potential to become delinquent or criminals.

Elements of family, peer group, school, and church

contribute to the socialization process.

the influences of peers cliques and crowds
The Influences of Peers, Cliques and Crowds
  • To what extent is our behavior influenced by others?
  • Do all people affect our behavior to the same degree?
  • Do different kinds of people have different kinds of effects on our behavior?
  • How do these questions relate to delinquency and crime control?
socialization processes of society
Socialization Processesof Society
  • Family relations
  • Education experience
  • Peer relations
  • Child abuse; sexual abuse; neglect
  • Interaction with authority figures
  • Institutions (church attendance and religious beliefs)
questions
Questions

Does delinquency cause educational failure?Or,Does educational failure cause delinquency?

the effects of socialization on crime
The Effects of Socialization on Crime
  • Social learning theory suggests people learn techniques of crimes from criminal peers.
  • Social control theory contends people are controlled by their bonds to society.
  • Social reaction theory argues that society contributes to criminality through the use of labels.
social process theories1
Social Process Theories
  • Social learning theories: differential association theory, differential reinforcement theory, and theory of neutralization.
  • Social control theories: containment theory and social bond theory.
  • Social reaction theory: labeling.
social learning theory differential association
Social Learning Theory:Differential Association
  • Sutherland and Cressey.
  • Criminal behavior and criminal techniques are learned. Learned behavior is a byproduct of interacting with others and may vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity.
  • Learned behavior begins within intimate personal groups – which involves assimilating criminal techniques, attitudes, motives, and rationalization.
  • Criminal behavior occurs when the definitions toward crime outweigh the definitions against crime.
differential reinforcement theory
Differential Reinforcement Theory
  • Akers
  • Direct conditioning occurs when behavior is reinforced by rewards and punishment.
  • Negative reinforcement over time
  • Applies the concepts of differential association with psychological learning theory – behavior is influenced by those groups that control reinforcement and punishment which defines normative definitions, i.e., parents, significant others or groups.
  • Studies suggest a strong association between drug and alcohol abuse and social learning variables.
neutralization theory
Neutralization Theory
  • Matza and Sykes
  • Youth learn ways to neutralize moral restraints and responsibility for antisocial behavior.
  • Stresses that youths’ learning of behavior is based on rationalizations that enable them to neutralize values and drift back and forth between accepted social values and illegal behavior.
questions1
Questions

If criminal behavior is learned,

how do learning theorists account

for the origin of criminal definitions?

How do learning theorists explain spontaneous and wanton acts of violence and damage?

social control theory
Social Control Theory

Control theories maintain

that all people have potential to become criminals

but that bonds to conventional society

prevent them from violating the law.

social control theories
Social Control Theories
  • Reckless’ containment theory – a strong self-image insulates a youth from criminogenic influences.
  • Hirshi’s social bond theory – onset of criminality is linked to the weakening of social ties or bonds.
  • Kaplan – youths with poor self-concepts are more likely to engage in anti-social behavior or criminal activities as opposed to engaging in normative groups.
elements of the social bond

Commitment

Criminal

Behavior

Attachment

Involvement

Belief

Elements of the Social Bond
hirschi s control theory
Hirschi’s Control Theory

MAJOR PREMISE

A person’s bond to society prevents him or her from violating social rules. If the bond weakens,

the person is free to commit crime.

STRENGTHS

Explains the onset of crime; can apply to both middle- and lower-class crime. Explains its theoretical constructs adequately so they can be measured.

Has been empirically tested.

testing social control theory
Testing Social Control Theory

Emprical studies revealed a strong support for

Hirschi’s control theory:

  • Students who had strong attachment to parents were less likely to commit criminal acts.
  • Commitment to conventional values was indicative of conventional behavior.
  • Youths involved in conventional activities were less likely to engage in criminal behavior.
  • Youths involved in unconventional activities were more delinquent prone.
testing social control theory1
Testing Social Control Theory
  • Youths with weak and distant relationships with others tended toward delinquent behavior.
  • Those who shunned unconventional acts were attached to their peers.
  • Delinquents and nondelinquents shared similar beliefs about society.
  • Recent research shows attachments to peers, school and family may be interrelated.
opposing views of social control theory
Opposing Views of Social Control Theory
  • Some contend delinquents may be influenced by close relationships with deviant peers and family members.
  • Not all elements of the bond are equal.
  • Many believe that social control theory cannot explain all modes of criminality.
  • Bonds change over time and this is not accounted for.
  • Some contend that delinquency weakens bonds, not that weakened bonds lead to delinquency.
social reaction theory or labeling theory
SOCIAL REACTION THEORY orLABELING THEORY

This theory holds that criminality is promoted

by becoming negatively labeled

by significant others,

in other words –

when people are labeled for their acts,

they organize their personalities around the labels.

labeling theory the basis for self concept
Labeling Theory: The Basis for Self-Concept

Decision to Label

Detection by the Justice System

Initial Criminal Act

Creation of a New Identity

Acceptance

of Labels

Deviance

Amplification

question
Question

According to the previous diagram,

is labeling a “cause” of crime

or,

the “effect” of crime?

consequences of labeling
Consequences of Labeling
  • Labels produce stigma
  • Condemnation is carried out in “ceremonies” such as trials and media attention (degradation ceremonies)
  • Differential social control: Self-labeling involves one taking on the attitudes and roles reflected in how a person views the way others see them
  • Joining deviant cliques: Some labeled people may join cliques and other outcast peers
  • Retrospective reading: refers to the reassessment of a person’s past to fit a current generalized label or status
  • Dramatization of evil: Labels become a personal identity
social reaction theory differential enforcement
Social Reaction Theory: Differential Enforcement

This theory holds that the law is

differentially applied –

it favors those in power in a particular society.

social reaction theory
Social Reaction Theory
  • Primary and Secondary Deviance
    • Edwin Lemert defined a norm violation with little or no long-term influence as primary deviance.
    • Secondary deviance refers to a norm violation that results in application of a negative label with long-term consequences.
    • The process whereby secondary deviance pushes offenders out of the mainstream of society is referred to as deviance amplification.
is labeling theory valid
Contributions of Labeling Theory:

It identifies the role played by social control agents in crime causation.

It recognizes that criminality is not a disease of pathological behavior.

It distinguishes between criminal acts and criminalcareers.

Criticisms:

It is unable to specify the conditions that must exist before an act or individual is labeled deviant.

It fails to explain differences in crime rates.

It ignores the onset of deviant behavior.

Is Labeling Theory Valid?
research reaction of labeling theory
Research Reaction of Labeling Theory
  • Evidence supports the targets of labeling (poor and powerless) are victimized by the law and justice system.
  • Contextual discrimination: refers to judges imposing harsher sentences on minorities.
  • Empirical evidence supports that negative labels influence self-image.
  • Cumulative disadvantage: Provokes repeat behaviors.
social process theory and social policy
Social Process Theory and Social Policy
  • Learning theories influence development of facilities to “unlearn” criminality.
  • Control theories influence programs to increase bonds to established values, like the Head Start program.
  • Labeling theories influence diversion and restitution programs.
  • Restitution/restorative justice programs permit an offender to repay the victim (and community) rather than face the stigma of a formal judicial process.