1 / 16

Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities

Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities. by William G. Bowen, Matthew M. Chingos, Michael S. McPherson. My goals today. Present highlights from CFL Implications for leaders at system level Issues in promoting BA production (Not your only goal).

kenley
Download Presentation

Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Crossing the Finish Line:Completing College at America’s Public Universities by William G. Bowen, Matthew M. Chingos, Michael S. McPherson

  2. My goals today • Present highlights from CFL • Implications for leaders at system level • Issues in promoting BA production (Not your only goal)

  3. Table 1-1. Flagship Universities by Selectivity Cluster SEL I University of California–Berkeley University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) University of Maryland–College Park University of Michigan University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill University of Virginia SEL II Pennsylvania State University Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey University of Florida University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign University of Texas–Austin University of Washington University of Wisconsin–Madison SEL III Iowa State University Ohio State University Purdue University Stony Brook University University of Iowa University of Minnesota–Twin Cities University of Nebraska–Lincoln University of Oregon

  4. TABLE 1-2. State System Universities by Selectivity Cluster or HBCU Status MarylandNorth Carolina SEL A SEL A University of Maryland–Baltimore County North Carolina State University SEL B University of North Carolina–Asheville Frostburg State University SEL B Salisbury University Appalachian State University Towson University East Carolina University HBCU University of North Carolina–Charlotte Bowie State University University of North Carolina–Greensboro Coppin State University University of North Carolina–Pembroke University of Maryland–Eastern Shore University of North Carolina–Wilmington Western Carolina University OhioHBCU Elizabeth City State University SEL A Fayetteville State University Miami University North Carolina A&T University SEL B North Carolina Central University Bowling Green State University Winston–Salem State University Cleveland State University Kent State University Virginia Ohio University Shawnee State University SEL A University of Akron College of William and Mary University of Cincinnati James Madison University University of Toledo University of Mary Washington Wright State University Virginia Tech Youngstown State University SEL B HBCU Christopher Newport University Central State University George Mason University Longwood University Old Dominion University Radford University University of Virginia’s College at Wise Virginia Commonwealth University Virginia Military Institute HBCU Norfolk State University Virginia State University

  5. Figure 1-1. Years of Schooling by Birth Cohorts, U.S. Native Born: 1876-1975

  6. Figure 2-2. Bachelor’s Degree Attainment by Socioeconomic Status

  7. Figure 3-10. Cumulative Withdrawal Proportions by SES, Flagships

  8. Figure 5-7. Comparison of Overall Graduation Rates for Students Who Undermatched to a SEL B Institution and Students Who Did Not Undermatch

  9. Figure 5-5. Undermatch Rates by Family Income and Parental Education

  10. Figure 7-2. BA Attainment Rates of White Students Who Started at 4-year vs. 2-year Institution

  11. Figure 6-1. Predictive Power of SAT/ACT Scores and High School GPA on 6-year Graduation Rates, Standardized Regression Coefficients

  12. Figure 6-5. Predictive Power of SAT/ACT Scores and High School GPA on 6-year Graduation Rates with High School Dummies Included,Standardized Regression Coefficients

  13. Figure 9-11a. 4-year Graduation Rate by Net Price among Full-time, Dependent, In-state Freshmen in the Bottom Income Quartile

  14. Figure 9-14a. 4-year Graduation Rate by Net Price among Full-time, Dependent, In-state Freshmen in the Top Income Quartile

  15. System-Level Challenges • Do More with Less • Innovate While Sustaining Quality • Balance System-Level Goals • Research and teaching • Bachelor’s/Associate’s/Certificates

  16. Issues for BA CompletionFocus on limited goal of BA production • Campus-level vs. System-level Completion Goals • Accounting for selectivity in measuring progress • Community College Issues • Is this really a low-cost strategy for BA production? • Can completion/transfer rates be improved? • Can community colleges produce BA’s of equivalent quality to 4-year places?

More Related