1 / 15

Framing EU-Criticism in Dominant Newspapers

Framing EU-Criticism in Dominant Newspapers. Katri Vallaste April 13th, 2007. Problems with definition. Euroscepticism and Europhilia equally difficult to define (Daddow 2006) Euroskepticism (soft vs . hard), Europhobia, Europragmatism, Euroenthusiasm, etc. Defining as a mere formality

kelli
Download Presentation

Framing EU-Criticism in Dominant Newspapers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Framing EU-Criticism in Dominant Newspapers Katri Vallaste April 13th, 2007

  2. Problems with definition • Euroscepticism and Europhilia equally difficult to define (Daddow 2006) • Euroskepticism (soft vs. hard), Europhobia, Europragmatism, Euroenthusiasm, etc. • Defining as a mere formality • Normative usage in research • Why is it helpful to make typologies á la Taggart & Szczerbiak/Kopecky & Mudde?

  3. According to Taggart 1998, Euroscepticism… • ”expresses the idea of contingent or qualified opposition, as well as incorporating outright and unqualified opposition to the process of European integration”

  4. Assumptions • EU-criticism is socially constructed • Mainstream media play a significant role in constructing social phenomena

  5. Data • Dominant newspapers in • Sweden: Dagens Nyheter • Finland: Helsingin Sanomat • Estonia: Postimees • Time frame 2000-2006 • Electronic data

  6. Frames • Contextualization • Thought organizers

  7. Preliminary findings • Euroscepticism is discussed in the context of ”problems” • Euroscepticism ”foreign” in Finland and Estonia, ”domestic” in Sweden (Junilistan)

  8. Biased vs. neutral language • “The leader of [UKIP] Nigel Farage threatened on Monday to make UKIP into a mass movement” • “The EU-critical list [Junilistan] wants to transfer power from Brussels to member states and organize a referendum in Sweden regarding the new EU constitution. The members of Junilistan have their background in different parties”

  9. Disease metaphors • “The critical attitude of Swedish citizens toward EU membership […] is not easing off” • ”The citizens’ clear dissatisfaction regarding the EU in many member states could develop into an inflammation if something is not done about it”

  10. The scared or the scary? • The scared • “In Britain […] the Constitution [for Europe] is feared to narrow Britain’s sovereignty” • Or the scary? • “Serious fear has arisen that the tiny Independence Party will eat the vote harvest of the Conservatives.”

  11. ‘Logic of difference’ and a ‘logic of equivalence’ (Laclau & Mouffe 1985) • ”Buttler has also met such people perceived the EU as a curse to get rid of. One even comes across people who will waive their fists and spit on [you], but Buttler does not complain” • ”The most regrettable surprise was that citizens did not seem to be interested in the EU. The percent of electoral participation was worse than ever at 45.3. […] The second surprise of the elections was the number of member states in which Euroskeptical parties won great favor”

  12. Thank you!

  13. ”Euroscepticism” lives a ”life of its own” • Criticizing the EU is an activity • Who are the actors: inside perspective • Carsten Schymik’s and Jochen Hille’s unpublished doctoral theses on Eurosceptic movements • Who talk about Euroscepticism: outside perspective • Politicians • Media

  14. Social construction of the EU • Are proponents/opponents supporting/opposing different entities? • Swedes, Finns and Estonians live in different EUs • EU as a moving target

  15. It makes a difference… • Who holds a view • Where a view is held • When a view is held • Whether a view is held passively or actively • If passively—why? • If actively—how?

More Related