1 / 22

Rotation of Jets from Young Stars: New Clues from the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

Rotation of Jets from Young Stars: New Clues from the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph. D. Coffey, F. Bacciotti, J. Woitas, T. P. Ray & J. Eisloffel 2004 ApJ 604 758. Abstract. To answer the question. Whether jets from young star rotate?

keahi
Download Presentation

Rotation of Jets from Young Stars: New Clues from the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rotation of Jets from Young Stars: New Clues from the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph D. Coffey, F. Bacciotti, J. Woitas, T. P. Ray & J. Eisloffel 2004 ApJ 604 758

  2. Abstract • To answer the question. Whether jets from young star rotate? • Observation were made of the jets associated with TH28, LkHα 321, and RW Aur using HST Imaging Spectrograph • Forbidden emission lines show velocity asymmetry of 10-25(±5) km/s • Foot points are located at ~0.5-2 AU, consistent with the models of magnetocentrifugal launching

  3. Introduction(1) Components • High velocity component ~20-200 km/s • Low velocity component ~20 km/s • Optical jet ~200 km/s • Radio jet ~200 km/s • Neutral wind ~200 km/s

  4. Introduction(2) • Jets are believed to play an important role in the removal of excess angular momentum from the system • Magnetocentrifugal forces are responsible for jet launching • Resolution constraints on observations have impeded progress in validating the magnetocentrifugal mechanism • Rotation of the jet is predicted

  5. Observations • Observation were made of the jets associated with TH28, LkHα 321, and RW Aur using HST Imaging Spectrograph on 2002 June 22, August 20, October 3, respectively • Assumption : Inclination angles of 10°for TH28, 44°for RW Aur and 45°for LkHα321 • 0.3″represents a deprojected distance of ~51, 195 and 233 AU along the jet for TH 28, RW Aur and LkHα 321, respectively • Hα, [OI], [NII], [SII] lines are used • Exposure time 2200 and 2700 s for blue- and redshifted lobes, respectively

  6. General properties of targets (Table 1)

  7. Results • All radial velocities are quoted with respect to the mean heliocentric velocity of the star (+5km/s for TH28, +23 km/s for RW Aur and -7km/s for LkHα321) • Low Velocity Component (LVC) has difference in radial velocities between the two side of the jet • High Velocity Component (HVC) appears not to be spatially resolved in spectra • Offset : set the emission peak in HVC as the jet axis

  8. Position-Velocity contour plots TH28 [OI] λ6300 Å RW Aur [OI] λ6300 Å LkHα [SII] λ6716 Å 0.2″ 0.1″ 0.1″ Jet axis 25km/s 0.05″ slice 1pixel High Velocity Component is not resolved

  9. Normalized intensity profiles Gaussian fitting technique, cross-correlation technique → velocity Error ±5 km/s 0.25″ 0.2″ 0.2″ 0.15″ 0.15″ 0.1″ Distance from jet axis 0.1″ 0.05″ 0.05″ 0.0″ 0.0″

  10. (Table 3)

  11. ΔVrad=VNW-VSE for LkHα321 (Fig. 2) Error ±5 km/s

  12. ΔVrad=VSW-VNEfor TH 28 (Fig. 3)

  13. ΔVrad=VNE-VSW for RW Aur (Fig. 4)

  14. Radial velocity (Fig. 5) Clear relation

  15. Derived velocity • From the results of this spectral analysis, combined with the inclination angles poloidal toroidal red lobe blue lobe • RW Aur 144-227 245-288 7-17 • TH 28 115-288 230-374 4- 8 • LkHα321 - 540-550 4- 9 km/s

  16. Discussion • Observations are in line with the observations of the jet from the T Tauri star DG Tau (Bacciotti et al. 2002) • Troidal and poloidal velocities have the same ratio as theoretical predictions (Vlahakis et al. 2000)

  17. Launching point (Table 4) Anderson et al. 2003 Assumption : M*~Msun

  18. Conclusion • The jets show distinct and systematic radial velocity asymmetries • Radial velocity differences in the low velocity component are found to be on the order of 10-25 (±5) km/s • In both lobes, jets rotate same direction • Foot points are located at 0.3-1.6 AU • These results are consistent with the models of magnetocentrifugal launching

  19. おわり

  20. Pixel shift (Table 2)

  21. Anderson et al. 2003 • Scaling law (conservation) • Mestel 1968 • ZEUS 3D : Axial symmetry : compared with analytic scaling • DG Tau foot point • ~0.3-4AU

  22. Bacciotti et al. 2000, 2002 • DG Tau with HST/STIS • 0.5″from the source (110AU when deprojected) • Toroidal velocity ~ 6-15 km/s • Foot point ~1.8AU • V_phi~R^-1 • Vp_inf=2^1/2(R_a/R0)Vk • dot Mjet/Macc=(R_0/R_a)^2~0.1

More Related