Evidence of Strong Updrafts in Tropical Cyclones using Combined Satellite, Lightning, and High-Altitude Aircraft Observations Christopher S. Velden*, Sarah A. Monette*, Edward J. Zipser , Daniel J. Cecil ✚ , Peter G. Black # , Scott A. Braun ★ , Gerald M. Heymsfield ★
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Evidence of Strong Updrafts in Tropical Cyclones using Combined Satellite, Lightning, and High-Altitude Aircraft Observations
Christopher S. Velden*, Sarah A. Monette*, Edward J. Zipser, Daniel J. Cecil✚, Peter G. Black#, Scott A. Braun★, Gerald M. Heymsfield★
*Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Utah, ✚NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, #SAIC, Inc. and Naval Research Laboratory,
★National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Goddard Space Flight Center
Satellite-Derived Tropical Overshooting Tops (TOTs) as a Discriminator:
Lightning Data as a Discriminator:
Convective overshooting tops (OTs) are clouds that grow above their ambient anvil and/or exceed the equilibrium level. They also often penetrate the tropopause. OTs are generally associated with localized buoyancy and updrafts of significant velocity, which can produce turbulence (Lane et al. 2012).
TOTs are the tropical relatives of OTs but are less-sampled, and therefore much less is known about them. They can be detected in IR imagery by an automated method developed at UWisc.- CIMSS (Monette and Velden 2012). The algorithm identifies local relative minima in the brightness temperature (BT) field and applies empirically-determined thresholds to distinguish the TOT from its surrounding anvil and determine its strength. Cloud pixel minima at least 4 K colder than their surrounding anvil (BTD ≥ 4) are flagged as TOTs.
At the time the ER-2 experienced turbulence overflying Emily, it had a 15,000 ft. vertical clearance over FL490
(49,000 kft) cloud tops.
We can use the high-level aircraft observations as an independent source to validate the satellite TOT signatures, and help us better understand what they imply.
Time of Turbulence
High Altitude MMIC Sounding Radiometer (HAMSR) onboard the Global Hawk identifies a narrow band of high reflectivity extending to ~12 km at thelocation of an identified TOT (estimated at 14 km).
However, the Global Hawk overflew FL560
(56,000 kft) cloud tops in Matthew (2010) with only 5,000 ft. vertical clearance, but did not record any significant turbulence.
Multiple lightning strikes are associated with turbulence-causing TOT in Emily (despite lower detection efficiency). None observed in Karl during which the Global Hawk experienced a smooth flight.
Comparison of TOT Brightness Temperature Difference (the TOT magnitude or “strength”) to ER-2 Doppler Radar measured updraft speeds in tropical cyclone conditions (from Heymsfield et al. (2010)) yields a moderate correlation.
Using a combination of satellite-based image analysis tools and lightning data, we are better able to identify convective signatures likely to be associated with locally strong updrafts in TCs which could potentiallylead to turbulence.
Result: New Global Hawk over-flight rules:
Aircraft should maintain at least 5000 ft. vertical separation from significant convective cloud tops except:
Cloud tops above FL500: Do not approach reported significant lightning activity or TOTs within 25 nm.
Cloud tops below FL500: maintain 10000 ft. separation from reported significant lightning or TOTs.
The above example and many other cases in GRIP and HS3 support the contention of Cecil et al. (2010) that cold (high) cloud tops alone can not deduce locally strong updrafts or associated over-cloud turbulence.
Christopher Velden: email@example.com
Support: NASA Hurricane Science Research Program