1 / 43

Evolution and Personality

Evolution and Personality . Personality?. B ehavioral strategy, a tendency to respond in specific ways to particular circumstances (some level of consistency) Psychological trait vs. psychological state. Person/situation debate ( Mischel ).

kalin
Download Presentation

Evolution and Personality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution and Personality

  2. Personality? • Behavioral strategy, a tendency to respond in specific ways to particular circumstances (some level of consistency) • Psychological trait vs. psychological state

  3. Person/situation debate (Mischel) • Whether person’s behavior is driven by personality or specifics of a situation?

  4. Evolutionary persp. • behavior = evolutionary strategy to maximize inclusive fitness • differences in personality = different life strategies • also situationally contingent

  5. Personality tests • Tests help measure and define different psychological traits • Factor analysis  personality factor

  6. Eysenck – three factors • Extraversion vs. introversion • Neuroticism vs. stability • Psychoticism vs. socialized • Given a score on each dimension. ..never one or the other • Each dimension orthogonal to each other

  7. Big five personality factors (Ocean) • Openness to experience • Conscientiousness • Extraversion • Agreeableness • Neuroticism

  8. David Buss • Big five factors represent a more evolutionarily plausible way of dividing up human nature • Scoring high/low doesn’t imply +/- of the personality factor • There’s no way of knowing how a person will react in a situation until you know their scores on all relevant factors

  9. Nature vs. Nurture? • Many personality factors are to some extent heritable (0.3-0.5 on a scale from 0-1) • Must be a benefit (in terms of inclusive fitness) to having variability in our offspring

  10. - Environmental factors • How you were treated as a child, pregnancy – toxins, drugs, radiation, diseases, diet/lifestyle etc., birth trauma, or any good/bad experiences

  11. Genetic factors • Differential susceptibility to rearing influence • Search for genetic underpinnings of personality – • D4DR- dopamine receptor (motivation and arousal) • 5HTT – codes for serotonin activity • Genes interact in complex ways so hard to disentangle effects of different genes, predisposition from genes may not be as strong as we think, and early environments may lessen/reverse the effects, heritability in twin studies vary based on different personality traits ( agreeableness and extraversion less heritable than anxiety), genes are pleiotropic

  12. Question... • If selection pressures led to the evolution of human nature… Then: shouldn’t we all have the same personality (not including brain damage and other unforeseen circumstances?)

  13. Individual differences make little difference in terms of inclusive fitness – and are therefore invisible to natural selection • No single globally optimal human nature

  14. Heritable traits • Passed down for a reason- should be fitness enhancing • So why is personality left more to environmental chance than genes? Why is it not completely inherited? • Work by David Buss explains heritable and nonheritable variation in personality depending on whether or not the variation is adaptive (is beneficial for fitness), non-adaptive (no effect on fitness) or is maladaptive (negative fitness consequences)

  15. Heritable component of individual differences • Non adaptive variation due to sexual recombination • Some individual differences might be a side effect of sexual reproduction, recombination/interaction among genes rather than natural selection.

  16. Heritable component of individual differences • Adaptive variation as a result of changing environments • Environmental changes could have led to evolution. Hard times favor more cooperative people and good times more independent people • As environments change, corresponding personality traits gain a fitness advantage and increase in that population

  17. Heritable component of individual differences • Variation in personality as a non-adaptive side effect • Heritable variation in personality may be a side effect of some other factors that are beneficial • Many reasons for differences in personality in offspring:

  18. Heritable component of individual differences • Adaptive variation due to ecological niches • In a group, its beneficial to have different personalities so you can form a behavioral niche with less competition from others of similar personalities • …does this explain why psychopaths exist?

  19. Heritable component of individual differences • Adaptive variation due to frequency dependency • Successfulness of a personality type depends on strategies adopted by other members of the population • Going to work early to avoid morning rush, driving in a specific lane, Primary psychopaths

  20. Non-heritable component of individual differences • Non adaptive differences due to social learning • Skinner behavior learned from reward and punishment • Bandura- learn personality by observing others via social learning (non-genetic influences support this idea)

  21. Non-heritable component of individual differences • Non adaptive variation due to chance • With 150 mil synaptic connections and 32,000 genes it’s impossible for the genes to be fully responsible for wiring of the entire brain – this is where the environment comes in. • Ex) different numbers of bristles in fruit flies, life expectancy of roundworms, and more connections in the brains of mice in enriched environments

  22. Non-heritable component of individual differences • Adaptive variation due to early environmental calibration (weather forecasting) • Genes may specify psychological mechanisms capable of calibrating a personality to best fit the environment in which the individual develops by attending to local conditions • Phenotype switching • Humans • Early experiences  different reproductive strategies. • Attachment theory is another one

  23. Non-heritable component of individual differences • Secondary psychopathy as a gene environment interaction • become the way they are due to the environment – made not born – phenotype based on best guess prediction of future or selected from a battery of alternatives, or calibrated based on early environment • Few opportunities to gain resources by cooperating, dense population (more opportunities to cheat), potential for anonymous interactions (to get away with cheating) etc.

  24. Non-heritable component of individual differences • Adaptive Niche filling - Children’s personalities affected by the availability of particular niches in their group • Harris: Leader position taken in the group of friends – you can compete for it or become the joker etc. • Sulloway: First bornsand second borns personality differences

  25. Evolution and personality • Soccer team – having differences in roles enhances team as well as the individuals of the group – variation leads to a wait and see strategy to construct the best behavioral phenotype • Malleability/developmental plasticity allows us to alter our strategies in order to exploit circumstances in while we grow up

  26. .The end.

More Related