270 likes | 452 Views
Type Ia Supernovae: standard candles?. Roger Chevalier. Type I – H absent Type II – H present. Supernovae – spectroscopic classification. Filippenko 97. Light curves. Filippenko 97. Late spectra. Filippenko 97. Why SN Ia for cosmology?. Luminous
E N D
Type Ia Supernovae:standard candles? Roger Chevalier
Type I – H absent Type II – H present Supernovae – spectroscopic classification Filippenko 97
Light curves Filippenko 97
Late spectra Filippenko 97
Why SN Ia for cosmology? • Luminous • Can occur in older stellar population; not closely tied to star forming regions • Uniform in properties e.g., Colgate 79
Basic interpretation (c. 1980) • Thermonuclear explosion of Chandrasekhar mass (1.4 M) white dwarf • Not a complete detonation • No compact remnant • The white dwarf accretes in a binary system • The burning produces ~0.6 M of 56Ni, the decay of which powers the light curve
Nuclear fusion gives ~1051 ergs • Adiabatic expansion in going from 109 cm to 1015 cm • Power for radiation (~1049 ergs) provided by radioactivity
Filippenko 97 Hamuy et al. 96
Application of the Phillip’s relation Hamuy et al. 96
Light Curve Shape method Reiss, Press, Kirshner 96
SCP (Supernova Cosmology Project) • S. Perlmutter et al. • Used Phillip’s relation and light curve “stretch” • HZT (Hi – z Supernova Search Team) • B. Schmidt et al. • Used LCS method
SN Ia Discoveries at z>1 from the HST Riess et al. 2004
Spectra • SN type • Redshift z Riess et al.
Evolution leading to SN Ia • Single degenerate in binary (standard model) • Low accretion of H – explodes and blown off • dM/dt>10-7 M/yr, stable accretion • dM/dt>3x10-7 M/yr, build up envelope → spiral-in? • “Hachisu” wind? • Double degenerate • Gravitational radiation drives binary evolution • But, unstable mass transfer → burning to ONe WD → accretion induced collapse
Explosion physics • 1-dimensional (spherical) models • Deflagration • DD – delayed detonation • PDD – pulsating delayed detonation • 3-dimensional models • Importance of Rayleigh-Taylor instability Ropke & Hillebrandt 05
Explaining the Phillips’ relation • Metallicity – more CNO → more 22Ne → less 56Ni • Central density at time of ignition Travaglio et al. 05
Conclusions • We do not understand evolution leading to explosion, explosion mechanism, Phillips’ relation… • But, there are no indications that the high-z SNe Ia are different from nearby ones