1 / 19

Optimal Compressor Placement for Future Mine Development

Determine best compressor positions at Rustenburg Platinum Mine to reduce reliance on specific compressors and assess isolation feasibility.

julio
Download Presentation

Optimal Compressor Placement for Future Mine Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic placement of compressors for future mine developments HG BrandAugust 2012

  2. Introduction • Rustenburg Platinum Mine (RPM) consists of eight shafts supplied with air from six compressor houses • Mandate of the simulation: • Determine the best position of the compressors replacing the West 10 compressors • Reduce the system’s reliance on the VK-125 compressor • Determine whether Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khusuleka 2 (Boschfontein) can be isolated

  3. Surface layout

  4. Simulation 1: Description • Aim: Verify accuracy at high flow rates • The average flow profile for the air network is determined • The simulation is run to replicate the pressures at the shafts • These pressures are compared to the actual pressures at the shafts

  5. Simulation 1: Results

  6. Simulation 2: Description • Aim: To alleviate the system’s reliance on the VK-125 • West 10 compressor house is decommissioned • The high risk pipe section from Siphumelele 3 (Bleskop), via West 10 to Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) is removed • Two BB Sulzer compressors are simulated at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) • A GHH compressor is moved from West 10 to Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) to replace the VK-125

  7. Simulation 2: Results

  8. Simulation 2: Summary • Average required flow at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) is 107 Х 10³ m³/h • Peak flow can be 30 Х 10³ m³/h above average profile and the required flow can be as high as 137 Х 10³ m³/h • Available flow from two GHHs is 66 Х 10³ m³/h • The available flow is too low and the VK-125 cannot be stopped

  9. Simulation 3: Description • Both GHHs and the VK-125 are started at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) • Aim: Determine maximum pressure at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)

  10. Simulation 3: Results

  11. Simulation 3: Summary • The pressure at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein) increases to 622 kPa at the compressor house while the pressure at the shaft is 605 kPa • The pressure rating of the pipes are 800 kPa

  12. Simulation 4-6: Description • With the VK-125 running - Determined how many additional BB Sulzers are required and where to position them • A BB Sulzer was placed at Thembalani 1 (Paardekraal), Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and Khomanani 2 (Frank 2) • One GHH and the VK-125 was running at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)

  13. Simulation 4-6: Results

  14. Simulation 4-6: Summary • Best position to place the BB Sulzer is at Khomanani 2 (Frank 2), followed by Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and then Thembelani 1 (Paardekraal) • Flow spikes occur at Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khomanani 2 (Frank 2) • To accommodate flow spikes it is suggested that the second BB Sulzer compressor be positioned at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1)

  15. Simulation 7-8: Description • Aim - Determine whether to place the two BB Sulzers in one or two compressor houses • Three simulations are run • In all the simulations one GHH and the VK-125 is running at Siphumelele 1 (Turffontein)

  16. Simulation 7-8: Description • Solution 1 - One compressor is placed at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) and one at Khomanani 2 (Frank 2) • Solution 2 - Both compressors are placed at Khomanani 1 (Frank) • Solution 3 – Both GHH compressors at Siphumelele are running together with the VK-125 • Compare to the existing system pressures

  17. Simulation 7-8: Results

  18. Simulation 7-8: Summary • Solution 3 is not viable • Solution 1 offers the best option, followed by solution 2. • Solution 2 will be the preferred option • In both solution 1 and 2 the flow to Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) is in excess of 10 000 m³/h • This confirms that these shafts cannot be isolated

  19. Conclusion • The simulations indicated that the system relies too heavily on the VK-125 compressor • The best compressor placement was at Khomanani 1 (Frank 1) • Khusuleka 1 (Townlands) and Khusuleka 2 (Boschfontein) cannot be isolated from the rest of the air network.

More Related