1 / 62

Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design

Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design . Lesley Pearce Technology National Coordinator Team Solutions The Auckland University. Level 8 Learning Objective. Knowledge of Design

jules
Download Presentation

Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Undertake a critique of a technological outcome’s design Lesley Pearce Technology National Coordinator Team Solutions The Auckland University

  2. Level 8 Learning Objective Knowledge of Design • ‘Knowledge of design focuses on understanding the way informed creative and critical development of new ideas is achieved and how these are realised into feasible outcomes.’ • It is about demonstrating an understanding of complex concepts in design. • Understand the importance and impact of design

  3. Why and How • Why would we consider this important to put into our programmes? • How will we develop rich learning for our students?

  4. Lets start with… And what personal criteria do we use

  5. What is good design? • The answer of course depends on whom you ask. If a design is “good” it depends largely on its function. A stylish bottle for a drink may look good, but if you need a special opener to get at the thirst-quenching liquid inside, and then one drop at a time, the design has failed.If a design is good it thus depends first and foremost on the interplay of appearance, function and usability.

  6. Okay we all know plastic bottles are evil. They consume massive amounts of energy to produce, statistically only spend 30 minutes in our hands before spending the next thousand years in a landfill. So what criteria do we use to judge the quality of the design?

  7. What is good design? • “Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works.” Steve Jobs • “ Design is a funny word. Some people think design means how it looks. But od course, if you dig deeper, its really how it works.” Steve Jobs. • “Design is a plan for arranging elements in such a way as best to accomplish a particular purpose.” Charles Eames • “ All architecture is shelter, all great architecture is the design of space that contains, cuddles, exalts, or stimulates the person in that space.” Philip Johnson

  8. Activity • Find a quote about good design that resonates with you. • Find one technological product that illustrates the quote. • Justify to the group on the quality of design of your chosen image

  9. What do students think is good design? What criteria did they use?

  10. The design of the Mac wasn't what it looked like, although that was part of it. Primarily, it was how it worked. To design something really well, you have to get it. You have to really grok what it's all about. It takes a passionate commitment to really thoroughly understand something, chew it up, not just quickly swallow it.Steve Jobs

  11. Understand the importance and impact of design

  12. Don Norman: The three ways that good design makes you happy In this talk from 2003, design critic Don Norman turns his incisive eye toward beauty, fun, pleasure and emotion, as he looks at design that makes people happy. He names the three emotional cues that a well-designed product must hit to succeed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlQEoJaLQRA&feature=related

  13. 3.10

  14. Form v Function • Different people will have different views on what good design means to them. • The old argument form v function is often redundant in the 21st century criteria think – sustainability, • Cultures, personal preferences interest all play apart

  15. Asking questions • What is the design philosophy behind the technological object? • Sustainability Does this make it a good design/ • Accessibility – does this make it a good design • Functionality • Quality of manufacture • Emotional resonance • Endurance • etc

  16. Drop Chandelier by Stuart Haygarth

  17. Sustainability

  18. Accessibility

  19. Functionality

  20. Quality of manufacture/well made

  21. Emotional resonance • What product reaches your, “I want one of these”

  22. Endurance

  23. Social benefit – design that matters

  24. Aesthetic quality

  25. Ergonomic fit

  26. Affordability

  27. Industrial design Award 2010 • This year, not one, but three winners were named Best in Show by the 2010 IDEA awards jury. "We have three winners: a technology-based digital product, an ecological responsible consumer product and a socially responsible solution to a basic human need.  No result could have more accurately reflected where industrial design finds itself today.

  28. Web design criteria • Websites • The Academy evaluates Web sites based on six criteria: content, structure and navigation, visual design, functionality, interactivity, and overall experience.

  29. Activity • Lots of tech outcomes • Rate 1 to 10 for good design • Discuss criteria used to judge good design • Assess again or use different tech outcomes • Criteria • Match up 10 design characteristics to different images of products

  30. design that is ……. • Functional • beautiful • enduring • well made —are offset by values like • affordability • accessibility • ergonomic strength • social benefit • necessity • emotional resonance

  31. The current issue of Metropolis makes a case for ten criteria for evaluating design arguments today, in the troubled economic, ecological, and political climate of the early 21st century. Arguably, these criteria provide an ethical framework for evaluating design so that the long-established yardsticks—design that is functional, beautiful, enduring, well made—are offset by values like affordability, accessibility, ergonomic strength, social benefit and necessity, and emotional resonance. No argument could meet all these criteria, but it might satisfy a few. More to the point, a loose framework gets us beyond the problem of labeling design as good or bad, or seeing problems as solvable. There are no solutions to design problems. There are only responses in the form of arguments. • http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20090318/a-good-argument • Dieter Rams Ten principles of good design • http://www.vitsoe.com/en/gb/about/dieterrams/gooddesign/

  32. Personal design exhibition • What would you put in it? • Consider the different aspects of good design • Justify decisions

  33. Ask a new question about an old design classic Is it still a good design in the new climate of…/Think of the use of steel/leather etc

More Related