Download
1 / 12
120 likes | 209 Views
This July 2007 report by Ted von Glahn explores using patient feedback to improve physician performance, focusing on public accountability, performance improvement, and pay-for-performance strategies in California. It delves into areas such as communication, timely service, patient flow, information flow, and coordination of care. The report emphasizes the importance of measuring and reporting patient experiences to drive improvements in healthcare delivery. The text outlines strategies for incentivizing healthcare providers based on clinical outcomes and patient experiences, while also discussing consumer demand and the significance of good science in research. Looking ahead, the report suggests expanding survey content, enhancing care coordination, and promoting public access to doctor ratings. It also advocates for disseminating best practices and integrating clinical and efficiency results to enhance patient experiences in the state of California.
E N D
Putting Results on Patient Experiences with Physicians to Use July 2007 Ted von Glahn Director of Performance Information and Consumer Engagement Pacific Business Group on Health
Patient Experience Performance: Applying Results in California Market • Public Accountability • Performance Improvement • Pay for Performance • Consumer Decision Support
Public Accountability 20 Top Performing CA Medical Groups California Office of Patient Advocate 2005
Staff-Patient • communication • Timely service Reception • Access • Staff-Patient • Communication PATIENT FLOW INFORMATION FLOW Examination Room Prior to Visit Patient Experience • Coordination • of care • Nurse/MA-Patient • comm. • Coordination • of care Physical Examination Follow-up Care Outside of Office Visit • MD-Patient • communication • Coordination of • care
Pay for PerformanceIncentive Components Recommended • 50% Clinical results • 30% Patient experience • 20% IT/system • 10% Bonus doctor-level $ incentive program
Consumer ChoiceState of California Ratings California Office of Patient Advocate 2005
Patient ExperienceMeasurement and Reporting • Consumer demand • PBGH consumer research results • Good science • Strong psychometric properties • Proven feasibility • Work executed in diverse settings throughout CA yearly since 2003
Consumer DemandDoctor Choice -- What Matters *Respondents PBGH Choice of Doctor Research
Good Science2007 Survey Work with 3,500 Doctors • High reliability • > 0.70 reliability with 25 patient respondents per MD • Discriminates performance • Intraquartile range (25th-75th) mean scores 10-20 points across doctors • Improvement opportunities • Low end: 65 mean score health promotion and chronic care support • High end: 88 mean score patient-MD interaction
Proven FeasibilityFive Years of Work (2003-2007) • Medical group/IPA source for patient samples • 183 groups report group-level results (public) • 39 groups report MD-level results (internal) • Cost $185-$205 per doctor • 35% patient response rate • Common version of C/G CAHPS survey: adult primary care, pediatrics & specialty care (differ slightly)
Patient ExperienceLooking Ahead • Expand scope of survey content • New module: chronic care support for patients • Expand coordination of care module • Performance improvement • Research – what improvement approaches work • Spread strategies – disseminate best practices • Public reporting of doctor ratings • Pooling and cost-sharing strategies • Integration of clinical and efficiency results
