1 / 41

Confounding and Effect Modification

Confounding and Effect Modification. Karen Bandeen-Roche, Ph.D. Hurley-Dorrier Chair and Professor of Biostatistics July 20, 2010. Outline. Causal inference: comparing “otherwise similar” populations “Confounding” is “confusing” Graphical representation of causation Addressing confounding

Download Presentation

Confounding and Effect Modification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Confounding and Effect Modification Karen Bandeen-Roche, Ph.D. Hurley-Dorrier Chair and Professor of Biostatistics July 20, 2010 JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  2. Outline • Causal inference: comparing “otherwise similar” populations • “Confounding” is “confusing” • Graphical representation of causation • Addressing confounding • Effect modification JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  3. Counterfactual Data Table JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  4. Actual Data Table JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  5. Goal of Statistical “Causal” Inference • “Fill-in” missing information in the counterfactual data table • Use data for persons receiving the other treatment to fill-in a persons missing outcome • Inherent assumption that the other persons are similar except for the treatment:“otherwise similar” • Compare like-to-like JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  6. Confounding Confound means to “confuse” When the comparison is between groups that are otherwise not similar in ways that affect the outcome Simpson’s paradox; lurking variables,…. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  7. Confounding Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption * * * * * * * Drowning rate * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ice Cream consumption JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  8. Confounding Epidemiology definition: A characteristic “C” is a confounder if it is associated (related) with both the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) and is not causally in between Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate ?? JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  9. Confounding Statistical definition: A characteristic “C” is a confounder if the strength of relationship between the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) differs with, versus without, adjustment for C Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Outdoor Temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  10. Confounding Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption * * * * * * * Drowning rate * * * * * * * * * Warm temperature * * * * * * * * * * Cool temperature Ice Cream consumption JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  11. Mediation A characteristic “M” is a mediator if it is causally in the pathway by which the risk factor (X: ice cream) leads the outcome (Y: drowning) Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Cramping JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  12. Confounding Statistical definition: A characteristic “C” is a confounder if the strength of relationship between the outcome and the risk factor differs with, versus without, comparing like to like on C Thought example: Outcome = remaining lifespan Risk factor = # diseases Confounder = age JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  13. Example: Graduate School AdmissionsUC Berkeley JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  14. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  15. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  16. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  17. What is the lurking variable causing admissions rates to be lower in departments to which more women apply? Gender Admission ?? JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  18. What is the lurking variable causing admissions rates to be lower in departments to which more women apply? Gender Admission Department to which applied JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  19. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  20. Controlling for Confounding Unadjusted (for department) difference in admission rates between women and men: 36-55 = -19% Adjusted (for department) difference in admission rates between women and men: Average(20, 5, -3, -4) = 4.5% Weighted ave(20, 5,-3, -4) = JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  21. …Now for something entirely different Particulate air pollution and mortality JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  22. Chicago July 2010

  23. Los Angeles July 2010

  24. Correlation: Daily mortality and PM10 • New York -0.031 • Chicago -0.036 • Los Angeles -0.019 Is season confounding the correlation between PM10 and mortality? What would happen if we “removed” season from the analysis? July 2010

  25. Season-specific correlations July 2010

  26. Overall association for New York July 2010

  27. July 2010

  28. July 2010

  29. July 2010

  30. July 2010

  31. Season-specific associations are positive, overall association is negative July 2010

  32. Overall correlations July 2010

  33. Overall correlations July 2010

  34. Effect modification A characteristic “E” is an effect modifier if the strength of relationship between the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) differs within levels of E Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Outdoor temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  35. Effect Modification Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption * * * * * * * * * * Drowning rate * * * * * * Warm temperature * * * * * * * * * * Cool temperature Ice Cream consumption JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  36. Question: Does aspirin use modify the association between treatment and adverse outcomes?

  37. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  38. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  39. JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  40. Aspirin use modifies the effect of treatment on the risk of stroke? Losartan –vs- Atenolol Stroke Aspirin Use JHU Intro to Clinical Research

  41. Summary • Causal inference: comparing “otherwise similar” populations • Confounding means confusing: comparing otherwise dissimilargroups • Stratify by confounders and make comparisons within strata, then pool results across strata to avoid the effects of confounding • Effect modification when the treatment effect varies by stratum of another variable JHU Intro to Clinical Research

More Related