1 / 7

WP1 - International comparison and downscaling

WP1 - International comparison and downscaling. Objective. Nourishing the conceptual and technical setting of the project. 3 activities: A11 - Comparison of around 50 PES in the world; A12- National mapping of PES and other instruments and sites selection; A13- Sites characterization.

jmurphy
Download Presentation

WP1 - International comparison and downscaling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP1 - International comparison and downscaling

  2. Objective • Nourishing the conceptual and technical setting of the project. 3 activities: • A11 - Comparison of around 50 PES in the world; • A12- National mapping of PES and other instruments and sites selection; • A13- Sites characterization.

  3. A11 - Comparison of around 50 PES in the world • Grey reports and reports published at the national or organisational level • Quantitative approach for typological and statistical analysis

  4. A1.2 – National mapping • Agreed for Mexico • A1.2.1: What associations of instruments do exhist in ‘ejidos’ (communities) recipies of PES? Description of instruments in synergy/divergence with PES (Statistical association and typologies – relation withdeforestationriskindicator)  TYPOLOGY MAPPING – alongdeforestationrisk; • A1.2.2: Where are these instruments taking place? (Policy mapping in Chiapas, Yucatan and Nayarit)  GEOGRAPHICAL POLICY MAPPING • A1.2.3: Deforestationanalysis for aboveworkingregions DEFORESTATION MAPPING • Sites election: [samepolicy mix]; rapidappraisal (land use; socio-economicdescriptors)

  5. A1.3 – Sites characterisationamong ejidos with highest deforestation risk • A1.3.1 – Agro-ecological characterisation • Rural economy characterisation • Land use evolution • Social-political evolution of instruments implementation • A1.3.2 – Data disponibility for WP2 • Available metadata for WP2

  6. Madagascar – WP1 • A11: Typology of PES projects – interactive mapping (around 8 and 11 sites): • Ecosystem service: type of service, bundled services, price of sold service, biodiversity importance • Actors: steering actor (int. ODA, WB…), who is benefiting, number of people benefiting (equity), [dependence on forest resources] • management model: devolution of management rights, other. Contract content • Area • Tenure regime • Existence of other instruments

  7. A12: Regional mapping: • Protected areas with buffer areas • Devolution of management rights (VOI are recipients) • Development projects • Land use change analysis (containing one of the sites)  [deforestation risk index map?] • A13: Site characterisation • Matching methodology for [3] sites, inside the sites: CI and REDD projects. WWF Goodplanet, Durrell • Agro-ecological diagnostic

More Related