1 / 59

NCEO Indicator 3 Teleconference

NCEO Indicator 3 Teleconference. DATE:  Tuesday, November 25, 2008 TIME:   10:00 Pacific, 11:00 Mountain, 12:00 Central, 1:00 Eastern. Presenters Facilitator: Anne Chartrand, Southeast RRC Jason Altman, NCEO Chris Bremer, NCEO Christopher Rogers, NCEO. Call Purposes.

jerry-johnson
Download Presentation

NCEO Indicator 3 Teleconference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCEO Indicator 3 Teleconference DATE:  Tuesday, November 25, 2008 TIME:  10:00 Pacific, 11:00 Mountain, 12:00 Central, 1:00 Eastern Presenters Facilitator: Anne Chartrand, Southeast RRC Jason Altman, NCEO Chris Bremer, NCEO Christopher Rogers, NCEO

  2. Call Purposes • To enhance understanding of the meaning behind the APR reports and what information is needed to properly analyze them • To provide state personnel with clarified instructions on how to properly complete the data analysis behind the Indicator • To enhance state by state APR reporting similarity • To clarify the similarities and differences between the APR and Table 6 sets of data and to show shortcuts between the two sets (including the use of a new tool developed by NCEO) • To address Improvement Activities for Indicator 3

  3. Call Materials • Posted at http://cehd.umn.edu/nceo/indicator3/Indicator3NationalCall.html • Have your own Table 6 data from your 618 report available • Have a copy of your improvement activities available

  4. Who are we? • We provide national technical assistance in: • The participation of students with disabilities in national and state assessments • State standards-setting efforts • State graduation requirements • http://www.nceo.info NCEO has been responsible for Indicator 3 analysis going back to State Performance Plan submission

  5. APR and Table 6 of 618 – Trail of History APR 03-04 (looks a lot like Table 6) SPP 04-05 (new format) 04-05 Table 6 SEPARATE APR 05-06 through 07-08 Table 6 attached! X

  6. Why Is This Important? • Table 6 provides the backbone to APR Indicator 3 (Most states fill out their Section 618 report first) • OSEP needs the data from both these sources so that it has a clear picture of the assessment of SWDs across states • National summary by content, type of assessment, and grade is important

  7. What do the data tell us? We know how difficult your job as data managers can be!!!

  8. APR Instructions – 2007-08 • AYP • # of districts meeting the State’s AYP objectives for progress for the disability subgroup divided by the total # of districts meeting minimum “n” size • Participation • Sub-indicators for Regular Assessment (both with and without accommodations), and Alternate Assessment (both AA-GLAS, and AA-AAS) • Performance • Sub-indicators for Regular Assessment (both with and without accommodations), and Alternate Assessment (both AA-GLAS, and AA-AAS)

  9. Indicator 3A - AYP • This number is intended to show the percentage of districts in your state that are making Adequate Yearly Progress • To do this, districts must meet AYP for both Math AND Reading • AYP DATA BY CONTENT AREA DO NOT GIVE A CLEAR PICTURE WITHOUT AN OVERALL NUMBER • Proper Calculation on following page

  10. Indicator 3A - AYP • Example calculation – State XYZ has had 32 districts meet AYP for Math, and 28 districts meet AYP for Reading • ONLY 14 districts made AYP for BOTH Math and Reading • State XYZ had 50 districts meet the minimum “n” size • Calculation = districts meet AYP / total “n” districts • = 14 / 50 • = 28% overall • NOTICE – THIS NUMBER IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE MATH OR READING CONTENT AREA ONLY CALCULATION

  11. Indicator 3A - AYP • Included below is the outline for an example table • This table allows for states to highlight successes • At the same time this table displays all necessary information

  12. Assessment Data From: 618: Table 6 To: APR Indicator 3 NCEO Indicator 3 Tool To be used for lifting assessment data from Section 618: Table 6 reports Altman, J. R., Bremer, C., Vang, M., Thurlow, M., & Rogers, C. (2008)

  13. Table 6: What is it? • Table 6 is included in the section 618 report • Table 6 must be submitted w/ APR in February • It looks something like this (broken up into worksheets in excel):

  14. Indicator 3B - Participation • Calculations: • a. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades • b. # of children with IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations • c. # of children with IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations • d. # of children with IEPs in alternate assessment against grade level achievement standards • e. # of children with IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate achievement standards • Account for any children included in “a” but not included in “b, c, d, or e” above.

  15. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

  16. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

  17. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 • The entire APR Indicator 3 participation table can be created using 618: Table 6 Data!!!! • In the example to come Table 6 location is listed in each APR cell in the following format: • (Column) : (Grade)

  18. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 618: Column 1 Grade 3 618: Column 8 Grade 4

  19. Indicator 3 Child Count Data 618: Table 6 Test Data

  20. Indicator 3 Regular Assessment Data 618: Table 6 IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations equal to BLUE minus GREEN

  21. Indicator 3 Regular Assessment Data 618: Table 6

  22. Indicator 3 618: Table 6

  23. Indicator 3 Alternate Assessment Data 618: Table 6

  24. Indicator 3 Alternate Assessment Data 618: Table 6

  25. Indicator 3 618: Table 6

  26. Indicator 3 Alternate Assessment Data 618: Table 6

  27. Indicator 3 Overall Calculations Overall equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet

  28. Indicator 3 Overall Calculations Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100

  29. Indicator 3 Non-Participant Data 618: Table 6

  30. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 Overall Row Total equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet + Orange + Pink (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN)

  31. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN)

  32. Questions, Comments and Concerns

  33. Indicator 3C - Performance • Calculations: • a. # of children with IEPs in assessed grades • b. # of children with IEPs proficient or above in regular assessment with no accommodations • c. # of children with IEPs proficient or above in regular assessment with accommodations • d. # of children with IEPs proficient or above in alternate assessment against grade level achievement standards • e. # of children with IEPs proficient or above in alternate assessment against alternate achievement standards • REMEMBER – Raw numbers are VITAL!!!

  34. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

  35. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

  36. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 • Most of the APR Indicator 3 performance table can be created using 618: Table 6 Data!!!! • In the example to come Table 6 location is listed in the following format: • (Column) : (Grade)

  37. 618: Column 1 Grade 3 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 618: Proficient Levels Table 9d Grade 6

  38. Indicator 3 Child Count Data 618: Table 6

  39. Regular Assessment Data Indicator 3 618: Table 6 Not Available on 618: Table 6

  40. Regular Assessment Data Indicator 3 For IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations sum columns shaded below then take that result and subtract Green 618: Table 6 Example of state with minimum proficient level of 3

  41. Alternate Assessment Data Indicator 3 618: Table 6 For IEPs in AA-GLAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right Example of state with minimum proficient level of 2

  42. Alternate Assessment Data Indicator 3 618: Table 6 For IEPs in AA-MAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right Example of state with minimum proficient level of 2

  43. Indicator 3 Alternate Assessment Data 618: Table 6 For IEPs in AA-AAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right Example of state with minimum proficient level of 4

  44. Indicator 3 Overall Calculations Overall equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet

  45. Indicator 3 Overall Calculations Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100

  46. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 Overall Row Total equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet + Orange + Pink (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN)

  47. Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3 Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN)

  48. Questions, Comments and Concerns

  49. Improvement Activities (IAs)

  50. Improvement Activities (IAs): Categories A-J • Improve data collection and reporting • Improve systems administration and monitoring • Provide training/professional development • Provide technical assistance • Clarify/examine/develop policies and procedures • Program development • Collaboration/coordination • Evaluation • Increase/adjust Full Time Equivalent • Other

More Related