1 / 8

Former Spellman Engineering Site

City Council Meeting October 6, 2008 William C. Denman, P.E. Remedial Project Manager Denman.Bill@epa.gov (404) 562-8939. Former Spellman Engineering Site. Background – RI/FS Extent of Ground Water Contamination. Background RI/FS (cont.). Conceptual Site Model

javier
Download Presentation

Former Spellman Engineering Site

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. City Council Meeting October 6, 2008 William C. Denman, P.E. Remedial Project Manager Denman.Bill@epa.gov (404) 562-8939 Former Spellman Engineering Site

  2. Background – RI/FSExtent of Ground Water Contamination

  3. Background RI/FS (cont.) Conceptual Site Model Vertical Distribution of TCE Contamination in Ground Water

  4. Background - RI/FS (cont.)Key Findings • No actual human exposure to contaminated ground water is occurring • The ground water plume underlies approximately 40-acres • Migration to the Floridan aquifer potentially threatens nearby municipal supply wells • Contamination can be addressed through an engineered remedy

  5. Conceptual Remediation Plan

  6. Cleanup ApproachPost-Active Treatment • Natural attenuation monitoring until cleanup goals are met • TCE: 3 ug/L • DCE: 70 ug/L • VC: 1 ug/L • Five-year reviews of remedy until cleanup goals are met • Attains Unrestricted Use/Unlimited Exposure Criteria

  7. Remedial Action Funding • Remedial Action - Funding Options • NPL Listing and Superfund financing based on site prioritization (risk-based) • Voluntary cleanup • City of Orlando and the local community indicated a strong preference for pursuing an approach that would keep the properties off the National Priorities List. • EPA supported this approach. • Superfund Redevelopment Initiative • 2002 Amendments to CERCLA

  8. EPA’s Role in the Cleanup • EPA will remain the lead agency with FDEP support throughout • EPA oversight throughout cleanup and approval for completion

More Related