1 / 25

November 16, 2005

REcreate. Jennifer Balkcom, Tim Johnson, Scott Nguyen, Alison Novak, Arvind Pai. November 16, 2005. Agenda. Introduction Regulatory Processes Site Capacity & Design Elements Financial Feasibility Conclusion. Introduction. 505 Congress St. T. Multi-Family For-Rent On-Demand Office.

Download Presentation

November 16, 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REcreate Jennifer Balkcom, Tim Johnson, Scott Nguyen, Alison Novak, Arvind Pai November 16, 2005

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Regulatory Processes • Site Capacity & Design Elements • Financial Feasibility • Conclusion

  3. Introduction 505 Congress St. T Multi-Family For-Rent On-Demand Office

  4. Regulatory Processes • Governing Zoning • Article 27P: South Boston Interim Overlay Planning District • Supersedes Article 42E – Harborpark Fort Pointe Waterfront District • Article 80: BRA Review • Large Project Review • Scoping Determination Will Determine Reports Required • Boston Civic Design Commission

  5. Large Project Review Timeline

  6. Regulatory Processes • Challenges: • EPA & HUD standards • Fee schedule • Potential off-site mitigation to offset high site coverage ratio • Strategies: • Foster relationships with relevant BRA staff and neighborhood groups • Look to comparable projects

  7. Site Capacity & Design Elements • 30,435 SF; FAR=4; Max Ht=150’ • Open Space requirement • 50% in zoning code, with built-in flexibility • 70% reasonable IAW Boston Redevelopment Authority • Considerable flexibility in IPOD zoning: • Development envelope dependent on Large Project Review Process • Design guidelines are not set in stone (i.e. parking, façade, setbacks, buffers)

  8. Site Capacity & Design Elements • Concessions: • Affordable Housing – 10% • Included in Financials • Open Space Requirement – 50% • Currently at 26% open space, but considering creating/improving off-site open ‘green’ spaces • Negotiable • Street Improvements • Anticipate improving pedestrian access/experience and crosswalks to site and vehicular ingress/egress

  9. Site Capacity & Design Elements • Land use allotment: • Total built area: 121,740 based on FAR of 4.0. 85% efficiency implies Net Rentable Area 103,500 SF • Floor Plate = 23,400 SF Gross • Residential = 7 x 14,050 SF Gross • Uses in Net Square Footage: • Residential: 83,589 SF (110 units) • On-Demand Office: 19,190 SF • Common Facilities: 18,240 SF • Mechanical: 5,000 SF • Underground Parking: 23,450 SF • Open Space: 7,035 SF (on-site)

  10. Concept

  11. Floor Plan Design

  12. Street-Level View

  13. Financial Feasibility Analysis • Property Assumptions • Development Assumptions • Financial Assumptions • Feasibility Analysis

  14. Financial Feasibility Analysis • Property Assumptions • Fixed Office, Affordable Apartment and Parking Rents • Vacancy Rates from Market Analysis

  15. Financial Feasibility Analysis • Feasibility Assumptions • Construction Cost Estimates come from USGBC and a large commercial contractor • Includes conservative 10% premium for Green Building

  16. Financial Feasibility Analysis

  17. Financial Feasibility Analysis

  18. Conclusion • Timeline & Fees for Permitting • Creative Design Solutions • Green Design  Value • Attention to Context  Public Support • Next Steps: Detailing Construction Costs, Structuring the Deal, Design & FAR alternatives 505 Congress Street is a viable project

  19. Questions

  20. REcreate Jennifer Balkcom, Tim Johnson, Scott Nguyen, Alison Novak, Arvind Pai November 16, 2005

  21. RECREATE

  22. Site Capacity & Design Elements

  23. Site Capacity & Design Elements • Site description: • “Football shaped” • Greatest depth 100’ • Adjacent Central Artery (I-90) tunnel • Vent Building • High traffic flow surrounding site

  24. Site Capacity & Design Elements • Site Inventory: • Necessary utility & sewer infrastructure access on site • Minimal impact on existing traffic flows • Excellent access to T • Minimal pre-construction site preparation

  25. Financial Feasibility Analysis • Development Assumptions • Construction Costs are outside the scope of this analysis

More Related