1 / 28

Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms

Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms. Yasuyuki Matsuda (Muon Science Laboratory, RIKEN) for slow muon collaboration. Introduction Experiment at the RIKEN-RAL Muon facility Future prospect. Slow muon collaboration. Y. Matsuda (RIKEN)

janicehopkins
Download Presentation

Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms Yasuyuki Matsuda (Muon Science Laboratory, RIKEN) for slow muon collaboration Introduction Experiment at the RIKEN-RAL Muon facility Future prospect

  2. Slow muon collaboration • Y. Matsuda (RIKEN) • P. Bakule (RIKEN) • P. Strasser (RIKEN) • K. Ishida (RIKEN) • T. Matsuzaki (RIKEN) • M. Iwasaki (RIKEN) • Y. Miyake (KEK) • K. Shimomura (KEK) • S. Makimura (KEK) • K. Nagamine (KEK) • J.P. Marangos (Imperial College, UK)

  3. Applications of muon beam • Material Science : • mSR study with surface muon beam (30MeV/c). Very successful. By far, the most popular way to use muon beam. a But, its application has been limited to bulk material due to wide momentum dispersion and large beam size. • Muon-catalyzed fusion • Fundamental Physics • Search of rare decay mode and precise measurement of know decay mode • Muonium and muonic atom for study of symmetries, nuclear structure, etc… • neutrino source, muon collider a requires muon beam with better quality.

  4. Slow muons • Slow muons : muons which are (re-)accelerated from the muons which are almost at a rest. • Beam energy is tunable, and its spread is very small. a The range in the material is tunable down to sub mm. • Emittance is very small. a Small sample can be used. • New application of mSR for thin films, surface/interfaces and nano-materials, which are scientifically interesting as well as commercially important. • Possible application towards future muon/neutrino sources

  5. Two methods to generate slow muon beam • Cryogenic moderator method • Use a layer of solid rare gas as a moderator. • Initial energy is 10-100eV, and its spread is around 10eV. • Time structure is determined by initial beam. • Laser resonant ionization method • Obtain slow muons by ionizing thermal muoniums emitted from a hot tungsten film. • Initial energy is around 0.2eV, and its spread is less than 1eV. • Time structure is determined by laser timing. g Gives better time resolution for pulsed beam. g Possible use for Mu anti-Mu conversion experiment as a sensitive detection method of anti-Mu and background suppression.

  6. Previous slow muon experiments PSI slow muon beam line • Cryogenic moderator method • Efficiency close to 10-4 • Initial beam energy spread is about 10eV • Yielded about 700 m/sec (*1) • DC source • A timing counter needs to be inserted in the transport line for mSR study • Successful operation since 1993 ISIS EC slow muon beam line • Applied cryogenic moderator method to a pulsed muon source. • Yielded about 1 m/sec (*2) • Pulsed source • Time-of-flight showed time resolution was about 90nsec (FWHM), according to ISIS beam pulse width. • Better energy resolution than PSI thanks to absence of a trigger counter. • Currently defunct. (*1) E. Morenzoni et al. Physica B 326(2003)196 (*2) K. Trager et al. Physica B 289-290(2000)662

  7. PSI slow muon beam line E. Morenzoni et al. Hyperfine Interactions 106(1997)229

  8. Laser Ionization method : How to ionize muonium? • Similar to LIS (example: COMPLIS at ISOLDE) but needs much higher ionization energy. • Use two-photon ionization of muonium with 122nm and 355nm light. 1S-2P transition is most intense one among muonium’s transitions. • Use a sum-difference frequency mixing method to generate 122nm light.

  9. Diagram of the laser system • All-solid laser system using OPOs and Nd:YAG lasers a Stable operation a Gives good timing (1nsec accuracy) a Good overlapping of 212nm laser and 820nm laser for frequency mixing in Kr gas. a Good overlapping of VUV light and 355nm laser for ionizing muonium. (The lifetime of 2P state is only 1.6nsec.)

  10. Schematic view of the slow muon beam line

  11. Schematic view of the slow muon beam line

  12. The first observation of slow muons at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility (July 2001) • A clear peak on TOF spectrum was observed at the position which corresponds slow muon at the accelerating voltage of 7.5kV. • Measured magnetic field of the bending magnet corresponds to the correct muon mass. • Count rate was 0.03 m/sec. (too small!)

  13. Improved slow muon generation at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility (April 2003) • The yield of slow muon (3.3 slow m/sec) is 100 times more than that obtained in July 2001, and larger than the previous experiment at the EC muon beam line with cryogenic moderator method. • The time diversion of slow muon beam is about 10ns (FWHM), whereas the cryogenic moderator experiment gave about 100nsec.

  14. Improvements during 2001/02 • laser system improvement • Improved VUV laser intensity by phase-matching. • Installed image relays for pumping YAG resulted an improved profile. • Installed an image relay for 355nm laser, eliminating hot spots. • Installed a cylindrical telescope to convert 355ns laser’s beam profile to perpendicular shape (3x12mm) to maximize overlapping between 355nm and VUV lasers. • beam line improvement • Removed a small aperture, which was reducing initial beam intensity. • Target thickness was reduced so that we can maximize the number of muons stopped at the rear-surface of the target. • Beam line magnet was tuned to maximize Port 3 intensity while keeping same intensity at Port 2.

  15. What is phase matching? P=e0(c(1)E+c(2)E2+c(3)E3+…) P: polarization (dipole moment per unit volume) c(1): linear susceptibility c(2): second order nonlinear susceptibility c(3): third order nonlinear susceptibility Phase-matching condition: phase velocity of generated light equals to that of induced nonlinear polarization. g efficient nonlinear process

  16. Kr-Ar phase matching at muonium 1S-2P frequency • Enhancement of VUV generation due to phase matching of Kr gas with Ar buffer gas was observed with slow muon yield. • The ratio of Kr and Ar buffer gas (1:6) agrees with theoretical calculation.

  17. Muon stopping range tuning • The thickness of the degrader is optimized to give maximum yield of slow muons. • Measured range width (5.5% FWHM) reasonably agrees with expected value.

  18. Laser timing dependence • Relative timing between the initial beam’s arrival time and laser irradiation time was scanned. • A double-pulse structure of the initial muon beam is clearly observed.

  19. 355nm laser power dependence • The power of 355nm laser for 2P g unbound transition is scanned. No saturation is observed up to 1.8W (70mJ/pulse) • Previously observed saturation at 1.5W was eliminated by improving beam profile of the laser.

  20. 820nm laser frequency dependence • The differential frequency in the sum-difference mixing is scanned. The slow muon yield peaked at the calculated frequency based on calibration measurements with hydrogen. • Corresponding VUV bandwidth is 0.02nm for 122.115nm

  21. Measurement of MCP’s efficiency • A vacuum flange at the end of the MCP chamber was replaced with a flange with 100mm SUS film. • A scintillator telescope was installed nearby the film to detect decay positrons from the film. • By measuring “enhancement” in scintillator’s spectrum, the number of slow muons stopped at the film was estimated. • The efficiency of MCP was evaluated to be about 66%.

  22. Efficiency of slow muon generation Observed slow muon signal : 3.3 m/sec (MCP efficiency 66%) a 5.0 m/sec (Decay in flight 43%) a 8.6 m/sec (Transport efficiency unknown. assume 100%) a >8.6 m/sec at the source Initial surface muon beam : 1.0x106m/sec Efficiency 8.6/1.0x106 = 8.6x10-6 (still low…)

  23. Issues to be addressed • Improvement of muonium ionization efficiency. • Improvement in laser power ^ both 355nm and VUV lasers are not saturating muonium transition. • Improvement of pumping laser’s profile will benefit frequency-quadrupling with BBO crystals • Improvement of OPO frequency conversion system • Stable operation of laser system is the key for the application of slow muon beam. • Improvement of muon to muonium conversion efficiency. • optimizing target material, its thickness, temperature… • Possible use of cyclotron trap with a thinner tungsten film

  24. Cyclotron Trap • PSI & LEAR application • Winding up the range path of stopping particles inside a weak focusing cyclotron field. It has been used for producing low energy negative muons beams, pions and anti-protons. • Moderator can be gas (typically ~1mbar Hydrogen), or thin metal foils. • Application for positive muons have been limited because of high capture rate of electron. • Cyclotron trap + laser ionization • Can expect increase of muon stopping density at the near-surface of Tungsten foil. • We will lose muon polarization. This will limit application for mSR, but is good for Mu 1 anti-Mu oscillation experiment. • Recover muon polarization with polarized laser light?

  25. Future plans • Beam study • Beam profile measurement ( Segmented MCP, Slit, emittance measurement) • mSR study • Scintillator telescopes installation around the MCP chamber. • Helmholtz coil installation • Thinking of fundamental physics… • Mu 1 anti-Mu conversion experiment : double coincidence between laser irradiation and anti-Mu detection will reduce background significantly. • PSI experiment accumurated 5.7x1010 muonium decays. We need significant improvement of slow muon yield. • Muon intensity improvement : J-PARC, new proton driver, new design of capture channel. • Muon to muonium conversion improvement : cyclotron trap • Muonium ionization improvement : laser performance.

  26. Time table (optimistic)

  27. Summery • We have successfully generated slow muon beam with laser resonance ionization method at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility. The yield has improved by 100 times compared to previous result obtained at July 2001. • Several improvement plans for more efficient VUV generation are under way to increase efficiency of slow muon conversion, which will make slow muons available to material sciences. • Slow muon setup can be used as a prototype of Mu 1anti-Mu experiment. We can expect reduced background by coincidence between laser irradiation and anti-Mu detection. • Measurement of beam profile and emittance is planned during 2003/2004. • There is a possibility for application to neutrino/muon factory, but its feasibility largely depends on improvements of laser system in terms of stability and efficiency.

  28. --------

More Related