430 likes | 579 Views
2. What limits maximal growth rates?. 3. . . growth. Why is Rubisco slow and non specific?. What governs maximal growth rates?. Design principles in photosynthesis wavelengths used and saturation . . . Synthetic carbon fixation pathways for higher efficiency. What governs the efficiency of photosynthesis and carbon fixation?.
E N D
1. 1
2. 2 What limits maximal growth rates? I’d like to take a different angle
I know this is not how it usually done
Relates to the constraints and selection forces
I’d like to take a different angle
I know this is not how it usually done
Relates to the constraints and selection forces
3. 3 What governs the efficiency of photosynthesis and carbon fixation? I’d like to take a different angle
I know this is not how it usually done
Relates to the constraints and selection forces
I’d like to take a different angle
I know this is not how it usually done
Relates to the constraints and selection forces
4. 4
5. Converts between 5 and 6 carbon sugars
e.g Ribose-5P is used for making nucleotides
e.g Fructose-6P is used for building the cell wall
Was analyzed as an optimization problem (Meléndez-Hevia & Isodoro 1994)
We use this as a starting point An illustrative example: the Pentose Phosphate cycle The pentose phosphate pathway is an important link between the 5-carbon sugars and the 6-carbon sugars. Each of these groups is important for basic cellular functions.
Ribose-5P for example, is a 5-carbon sugar used for making nucleotides and a few amino acids.
Fructose-6P is a 6-carbon sugar used for building the cell wall.
Melendez-Hevia and Isodoro formulated a problem of achieving this link, as an optimization problem.
They showed that simplicity is an important design principle for this pathway.
We tried to generalize this idea to the whole central metabolism network, we found that it does works in many different cases, but that there is another design principle which imposes more constraints on the network.The pentose phosphate pathway is an important link between the 5-carbon sugars and the 6-carbon sugars. Each of these groups is important for basic cellular functions.
Ribose-5P for example, is a 5-carbon sugar used for making nucleotides and a few amino acids.
Fructose-6P is a 6-carbon sugar used for building the cell wall.
Melendez-Hevia and Isodoro formulated a problem of achieving this link, as an optimization problem.
They showed that simplicity is an important design principle for this pathway.
We tried to generalize this idea to the whole central metabolism network, we found that it does works in many different cases, but that there is another design principle which imposes more constraints on the network.
6. The Pentose Phosphate Pathway defined as a game Goal:
Turn 6 Pentoses into 5 Hexoses
Rules:
Transfer 2-3 carbons between two molecules
Never leave a molecule with 1-2 carbons
Optimization function:
Minimize the number of steps (simplicity)
7. 7 Serious, take 5 minutes and six 5 carbons and try it out
8. Solution to Pentose Phosphate game in 7 steps
9. Solution to Pentose Phosphate game in 7 steps
Corresponds to natural pathway
Doesn't explain why the rules exist
Supports the idea of simplicity
10. 10 Looking carefully at this solution, you can see that this is exactly what happens in the pentose phosphate pathway. The 5's are xylulose-5P and ribose-5P. The 6's are fructose (-6P or -1,6P) and the intermediates are erythrose-4P, sedoheptulose-7P and glyceraldehyde-3P.Looking carefully at this solution, you can see that this is exactly what happens in the pentose phosphate pathway. The 5's are xylulose-5P and ribose-5P. The 6's are fructose (-6P or -1,6P) and the intermediates are erythrose-4P, sedoheptulose-7P and glyceraldehyde-3P.
11. 11
12. 12 But what are the “steps” allowed in biochemistry?
13. 13
14. 14 All possible reaction types are explored
15. 15 EC numbers define 30 possible enzymatic reaction families
16. 16 EC numbers define 30 possible enzymatic reaction families
17. EC rules were encoded into commands Start by saying: the number of possiblities is very large (tens of thousands of intermediates)Start by saying: the number of possiblities is very large (tens of thousands of intermediates)
18. 18 Optimization function finds minimal number of steps between any two metabolites The shortest path can be found efficiently using a customized BFS (breadth first search)
19. 19 Are all pairs of metabolites connected by shortest possible paths? (as allowed by biochemistry rules)
20. 20 Are all pairs of metabolites connected by shortest possible paths? (as allowed by biochemistry rules) Some pairs are connected by shortest possible paths
Other pairs can be connected in less steps via shortcuts
21. 21 Are all pairs of metabolites connected by shortest possible paths? (as allowed by biochemistry rules) Some pairs are connected by possible shortest paths
Other pairs can be connected in less steps via shortcuts
Cluster together pairs that connect via shortest paths
Define these as minimality modules
22. 22
23. 23
25. Biomass precursors are key metabolites
27. 27 Can carbon fixation metabolism be “enhanced”?
28. 28 Carbon is assimilated into plants by the Calvin cycle
29. 29 RUBISCO – the central carboxylating enzyme Estimated 4x1010 kg of this enzyme present on Earth
~5 kg per person on Earth
Most abundant protein on earth ! (?)
“slow” enzyme - maximal rate of carboxylation only
~2-3 per sec in C3
~3-5 per sec in C4
~8-12 per sec in cyanobacteria
30. 30 Non specific enzyme: O2 can be incorporated as a “wrong” substrate instead of CO2
31. 31 So maybe it can be made “better”? higher catalytic rate,
better substrate specificity
or both
32. 32 Here is the dataHere is the data
33. 33 Rubisco shows empirical kinetic rates tradeoff
34. 34 Correlations indicate related energy barriers
35. 35 Correlations indicate related energy barriers
36. 36 Rubisco shows empirical kinetic rates tradeoff
37. 37
38. 38 Rubiscos nearly optimal to their environments (rather than slow and non-specific)
39. 39 Can we find “better” ways to achieve carbon fixation?
40. 40 There are several alternative carbon fixation pathways
41. 41 We systematically explore all possible synthetic carbon fixation pathways
42. 42 Metabolic networks optimization & synthesis – a grand challenge for synthetic biology Future directions:
Compare alternative pathways “solutions” in different organisms
Try to implement alternative carbon fixation in-vitro/in-vivo
Couple synthetic carbon fixation to energy sources ? fuel production from sunlight/wind
or at least learn something about the logic of evolution,
and how: “evolution is smarter than you are” (Orgel’s law)
43. 43
44. 44