1 / 10

Optimality criterion methods

Optimality criterion methods. Methods that use directly an optimality criterion in order to resize the structure. Fully stress design and stress ratio resizing. Dual methods. Simple resizing rule based on Lagrange multiplier for single constraint. Fully stressed design.

samara
Download Presentation

Optimality criterion methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optimality criterion methods • Methods that use directly an optimality criterion in order to resize the structure. • Fully stress design and stress ratio resizing. • Dual methods. • Simple resizing rule based on Lagrange multiplier for single constraint.

  2. Fully stressed design • If we have a structure designed only under stress constraints, FSD assumes that at the optimum every point is at the stress limit for at least one load case, unless at that point the sizing variable is limited by a bound constraint. • This is generally true for a single material, but Section 9.1 of Elements of Structural Optimization has two examples of failure when there are two materials.

  3. Single inequality constraint • Optimization problem • Lagrangian • Optimality condition • Ratio can be viewed as cost-effectiveness of design variable.

  4. Iterative procedure • Increase variables that are cost effective and reduce less cost effective ones • Lambda found so that constraint remains critical • In top.m this is done by bisection method • However, linear or reciprocal approximation usually works too.

  5. Using the reciprocal approximation • The approximation • Then with some algebra get

  6. Container design example • Open top container needs minimum volume of 125m3. Sides cost $10/m2, bottom and ends $15/m2. Minimize cost. • Then • What solution do you estimate?

  7. Effect of eta • Eta=0.3 • Eta=3

  8. Eta=1 • x, and f • e’s and g

  9. Problems container • We started the iterations with an initial design that was in the ball park of the optimum. What kind of initial design will make the iteration diverge? • What is the logarithmic derivative of the optimum cost with respect to the required volume (if we change it from 125)? Note that you do not need to use any number from the problem or the solution to answer. • Use the answer of the previous problem to show that you can calculate the Lagrange multiplier of $8.333/m3 from the optimum cost of $1560 and required volume of 125m3.

  10. Top OC function function [xnew]=OC(nelx,nely,x,volfrac,dc) l1 = 0; l2 = 100000; move = 0.2; while (l2-l1 > 1e-4) lmid = 0.5*(l2+l1); xnew = max(0.001,max(x-move,min(1.,min(x+move,x.*sqrt(-dc./lmid))))); if sum(sum(xnew)) - volfrac*nelx*nely > 0; l1 = lmid; else l2 = lmid; end end

More Related