windows 2000 vs mac os x n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 158 Views
  • Uploaded on

Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X. Comparing Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on the following grounds: Architecture Design Goals Programming Interface/ User Interface IPC. Architecture (Windows 2000):. The Windows 2000 OS is divided into two sections: kernel mode and user mode.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X' - jacqui


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
windows 2000 vs mac os x
Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X

Comparing Windows 2000 and Mac OS X on the following grounds:

  • Architecture
  • Design Goals
  • Programming Interface/ User Interface
  • IPC
architecture windows 2000
Architecture (Windows 2000):
  • The Windows 2000 OS is divided into two sections: kernel mode and user mode.
  • Executes on a variety of hardware platforms.
  • Separates application-oriented software from operating system software

-OS software includes the Executive, the microkernel, device drivers, and the hardware abstraction layer.

-runs in kernel mode. (access to system data and hardware)

-Application software runs in user mode and has limited access to user data.

architecture of the mac os x
Architecture of the Mac OS X
  • Layered architecture divided into four distinct layers:

- Application Environment

- Application Services

- Core Services

- Kernel environment

architecture of the mac os x1
Architecture of the Mac OS X
  • Mac OS X encompasses many different technologies:

-Darwin

-Quartz

-OpenGL

-QuickTime

-Application Services

-Aqua

design goals
Design Goals

Windows 2000

  • Win2K design team objective was to design a robust, portable, maintainable, extensible, and secure operating system (OS).

Key features:

  • Robustness: protect itself from internal malfunction, software and hardware errors
  • Extensibility and Maintainability
  • Portability: function on a number of platforms with minimal re-coding
  • Performance
  • POSIX compliance and government certifiable C2 security
design goals1
Design goals

Mac OS X

The core of Mac OS X is UNIX and is based on the open source Darwin kernel. It has a graphical desktop environment and power, stability of UNIX. Mac OS X provides power, ease of use, and a pretty new look. It offers a command-line environment, and powerful networking.

Key features:

  • Integrated System: integrate a diverse collection of technologies and base this unified set of technologies on advanced kernel environment.
  • Extensibility: support new software, hardware, features and network technologies
  • Modularity: future enhancements
  • System Responsiveness: faster speed and operations
  • Enhanced Performance and Stability
  • Advanced User Experience and Productivity
advantages
Windows 2000

Maintainable and Extensible

Security: executive provides the only entry point into the system

Portability: across hardware architectures and platforms

Robustness

MAC OS X

Integrated system

Robust

Enhanced Performance and Stability

Backward Compatibility

Advantages
disadvantages
Windows 2000

No Backward compatibility

Lesser Speed

Less Reliable

MAC OS X

Security: Darwin is distributed under Open Source license, security threat

Not extensible like Win2K

Software compatibility shortcomings and support

Classic applications run and load slowly

Marketing weakness and media coverage

Disadvantages
conclusion
Conclusion:
  • Win2K is designed to be reliable and it can be maintained and extended to take advantage of new technologies. It supports multiprocessing and has portability.
  • The Win2K merges the best attributes of a layered OS with those of a client/server or microkernel OS.
  • It is a choice for business, and for highly distributed systems.
  • Mac OS X is more stable, beautiful, Aqua look, and graphics. It has layered architecture.
  • Only a few native OS X applications available, so best features of OS are untapped.
  • Multilingual support built in; better memory management and protected memory;
  • PM: Mac OS X is highly reliable, and supports the preemptive multitasking and protected memory.
programming interface
Programming Interface

Windows 2000

  • The Programming Interface is composed of a set of user-mode applications (called sub-systems) that perform operating system tasks.
  • It provides modularity.
  • Multiple application programming interfaces (API), while keeping the base OS code simple and maintainable.
user interface
User Interface

Mac OS X

  • New aqua like interface called Aqua
  • The top layer represents Application environments which encompass five application environments:Carbon, Cocoa, Java, Classic environment and BSD commands.

-Classic environment provides compatibility to run their Mac OS 8/9 applications

-BSD Commandsenvironment provides a shell to execute BSD programs on the command line.

  • Application servicesprovide system services to all application environments.

-includes Quartz,Quick Draw, OpenGL, QuickTime & Core Services.

user interface1
User Interface
  • Kernel environment is the foundation layer of Mac OS X. It is a high-performance and highly modular kernel and its primary components are Mach and BSD.
  • Mac OS X is based on Darwin (open source core, UNIX) kernel and it provides great stability for any development environment.
advantages1
Windows 2000

API: availability of tested APIs

Multi-processor

End-user applications

Micro-kernel: protects kernel since applications runs in user-mode

Ensures Security

Vendor tools

Mac OS X

Power and Stability: kernel based on UNIX (Darwin)

Advanced and new development features

Backward compatibility

Integrated Java, Internet application development environment

Graphics

Interoperability:supports interoperability for UNIX apps.

Advantages
disadvantages1
Windows 2000

Backward compatibility to 16-bit architecture

Integrated system

Mac OS X

Doesn’t ensure Security

Doesn’t provide End-user applications

No Support and training

Disadvantages
conclusion1
Conclusion
  • Windows 2000 has availability of well-defined and tested APIs, and vendor tools enhance development. It provides good support, training and end-user applications.
  • Mac OS X is built on open BSD UNIX, Java2, XML, PDF, and OpenGL standards so that third-party developers can add applications more easily.It offers advanced development options and new features for advanced users, especially UNIX gurus.
ipc inter process communication
IPC(Inter Process Communication)

Processes needs to communicate in some way with one another, to transfer some data or to let other processes know what's going on with one another.

Windows 2000

  • Win2K supports seven primary IPC mechanisms: Named Pipes,

Mailslots, NetBIOS, Winsock, NetDDE, RPCs, Local Procedure Call

Facility

  • With COM, the client can communicate directly with the process. With DCOM, the client can communicate directly with other processes on different computers on a LAN, WAN or the Internet.
ipc inter process communication1
IPC(Inter Process Communication)

MAC OS X

  • Mac OS has an inter-application communication (IAC) architecture, which provides a standard and extensible mechanism for communication among Macintosh applications.
  • Apple events are the primary methods for inter-application communication on Mac OS X.
advantages2
Windows 2000

system efficiently

more elaborate, reliable and stable IPC mechanisms

supported IPC mechanisms

MAC OS X

simple to use and implement

faster communication

Advantages
disadvantages2
Windows 2000

Hard to work in distributed computing environment

Slower IPC mechanisms due to inefficient memory management

MAC OS X

Event Mechanism requires many procedure calls.

one-way communication (BSD Pipes)

Apple Event objects creation time not suitable for performance-critical situations.

Disadvantages
conclusion2
Mac OS IPC mechanisms are simple to use and implement. It has a fast and more responsive system.Conclusion
  • Windows NT has more elaborate & complex, but reliable and stable IPC mechanisms.
windows 2000 vs mac os x1
Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X
  • Mac OS X is a better choice for educational environment.
  • Mac OS X is better choice for graphics, Internet and Java development.
  • Apple will, of course add ease of use to the core design goals. I'm sure the Mac OS X interface will continue to evolve under customer feedback and experience.
  • Apple has claimed that their goal is to make the first truly user-friendly UNIX box, or as they put it, a machine that “even your grandmother can use”.
  • I imagine advanced users will prefer Mac OS X, because it has advanced and new features for development environment as compared to W2K.
  • UNIX users will prefer Mac OS X because it provides shell prompt that is Mac Usage with UNIX-style Command-Line.
windows 2000 vs mac os x2
Windows 2000 Vs. Mac OS X
  • I would prefer Windows 2000 from a business point of view because it is a highly secure, extensible, maintainable, robust and portable OS.
  • It offers better support, APIs, vendor tools and end-user applications.
references
References
  • Operating Systems (Fourth Edition) by William Stallings
  • Inside Microsoft Windows 2000 by David A Solomon & Mark E Russinovich
  • The Apple - MacOSX Website:

(www.apple.com/macosx)

  • MacOS X News at The Macintosh News Network(osx.macnn.com/)