1 / 12

Diversity in the Classroom and Students’ Moral Reasoning

Diversity in the Classroom and Students’ Moral Reasoning. Sylvia Hurtado Matthew J. Mayhew Mark E. Engberg University of Michigan. Introduction.

Download Presentation

Diversity in the Classroom and Students’ Moral Reasoning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Diversity in the Classroom and Students’ Moral Reasoning Sylvia Hurtado Matthew J. Mayhew Mark E. Engberg University of Michigan

  2. Introduction • “Institutions should foster intellectual honesty, responsibility for society’s moral health and for social justices, active participation as a citizen of a diverse democracy, discernment of the ethical consequences of decisions and action, and a deep understanding of one’s self and respect for the complex identities of others, their histories and their cultures” (p. xii). • The Association of American Colleges and Universities (2002)

  3. Theoretical Overview • Moral reasoning development • What? Postconventional reasoning • When? One-term change? • Where? In context (psychologist’s fallacy) • How? Cognitive disequilibrium • Diversity theory • Cognitive disequilibrium via active learning, interaction with diverse peers

  4. Key Features • Assess impact of participation in a diversity course using a standard measure of moral reasoning (DIT2); • Beyond the standard pre- and post assessments, account for the type of pedagogy and learning that students report; • Model students’ selection of these courses as a way to emphasize that students’ comfort levels and predispositions can be accentuated or challenged during college

  5. Sample • 236 cases (151 diversity and 85 management) • 71% female • 22% students of color • 65% underclassmen • 80% primarily White neighborhoods • By course. . . • Diversity course = 87% female, 23% students of color • Management course = 42% female, 19% students of color

  6. Survey and Missing Data • Surveys • Student Thinking and Interaction Survey (STIS) • Time 1 and Time 2 • Defining Issues Test 2 • Time 1 and Time 2 • California Critical Thinking Dispositions Index (CCTDI) • Time 2 • Missing Data • EM Algorithm-Estimates missing values from population

  7. Variables • Pre-course demographic controls • Race • Gender • Previous diversity-related course learning • Course-related variables • Time 1 moral reasoning • Participation in diversity course • Active learning factor (6 item – alpha = .77) • Disposition toward critical thinking • Outcome: Time 2 moral reasoning

  8. DIT2 Mean Differences for Diversity and Management Courses

  9. Disposition to Critical Thinking Race (Minority) NS -.15* .18** Moral Reasoning Time 1 Course (Diversity) Active Learning Environment .39*** Gender (Female) NS .15* .21*** NS .19** .11* Previous Diversity Courses .57*** Moral Reasoning Time 2 Results * p<.05,**p<.01,***p<.001

  10. Direct Effects DIT2- Time 1*** CCTDI*** Course (diversity)* Indirect effects Previous Diversity Course** Race* Active learning* Summary of Significant Direct and Indirect Effects on Moral Reasoning Time 2 *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001

  11. Implications • Moral reasoning skills should be “standard equipment” of college graduates; diversity courses affect moral reasoning • Importance of accounting for pedagogy as well as course-taking behavior in classroom-based studies • Change over one term has important assessment implications for faculty interested in measuring student development

  12. For More Information • Diverse Democracy Project University of Michigan 610 E. University, 514 SEB Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259 • Phone: 734.647.7439 • E-mail: divdemo@umich.edu • Website: http://www.umich.edu/~divdemo/

More Related