570 likes | 892 Views
OUTLINE. Overview of CHIProductivity driversBarriers to ProductivityStrategies to improve productivityEfficient utilization of support staff within each productivity driverHow to make it all happenChallenges to be anticipatedTake home messages. OVERVIEW OF CHI. Patients71,000 users, 365,000
E N D
1. EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT STAFF TO INCREASE PROVIDER PRODUCTIVITY COMMUNITY HEALTH OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
Mae K. Goins, Vice President for Nursing
2. OUTLINE Overview of CHI
Productivity drivers
Barriers to Productivity
Strategies to improve productivity
Efficient utilization of support staff within each productivity driver
How to make it all happen
Challenges to be anticipated
Take home messages
3. OVERVIEW OF CHI Patients
71,000 users, 365,000 encounters
Ethnicity
56% Hispanic, 28% Black, 6% Anglo, 10% other
Insurance
59% Uninsured, 14% Medicaid, 2.4% Medicare, 2% Private, Other Public 22.6%
Income level
60.9% (<100%), 9.3% (101-150%), 2%(150-200%)
4. COMMUNITY HEALTH OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC- Services and Programs Family Services
Pediatrics
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Behavioral Health
HIV/AIDS Program
Oral Health
Optometry
Podiatry
2 Urgent Care Centers
Lab
3 Pharmacies
Radiology – 2 sites
School based Health Care Services
Health Connect
Migrant Health Care
Homeless Program
Health Education
Transportation
Temporary assistance to the needy (TANF)
WIC Services
Marketing
5. OVERVIEW OF CHI Staffing
600 staff members
30 different cultures!
Providers
60 Practitioners
Specialties: FP’s, Internists, Pediatricians, Ob/Gyn MD’s, CNM’s, ARNP’s, Dentists, Radiologist, Optometrist, Psychiatrists
6. E.H.R. and E.O.H.R. Implemented E.H.R. and E.O.H.R through integration effort
E.H.R.
Sage’s Medical Manager
Commenced upgrade to Intergy product
All Providers and services paperless except OB and BH (in few months)
Includes lab interface, prescription writing, e-documentation, imaging, etc
E.O.H.R.
Dentrix
All Dental Providers and all dental sites
Including digital imaging
7. WORK ON PRODUCTIVITY Focus on Productivity in past 2 years
Explored innovative, sustainable approaches
Tested some strategies in some sites
Rolled out and continue to roll out lessons learned
Will share the reasoning behind our activities and specific strategies implemented with support staff
BH ends here.BH ends here.
10. PRODUCTIVITY – the CHC dilemma Continues to be a hot topic in many CHC’s
Many below goal
Different opinions about reason for below average numbers
Multiple unsuccessful attempts to improve
Consultants also utilized
Unsustainable solutions
Implications?
Need for a completely different approach
Learned about the value of using Models to improve chronic disease care in BPHC Collaborative Inialtives
Basis for consideration of use of a “Productivity model” BH ends here.BH ends here.
11. WHY A PRODUCTIVITY MODEL? Models
Framework approach to problem solving
Entire horizon addressed
Less “shooting off the hip”
Minimizes destructive passionate positions
Reduces potential for blame games and finger-pointing
Decreases bias
Increases buy in
Increases chances for sustaining change
Especially with pROduCtIviTY
12. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVERS Productivity
=k # of hrs worked x Patient supply x Provider speed
Total Provider Work Volume
Productivity drivers:
# of Hours Worked
Patient Supply
Provider Speed
Total Provider Work Volume
What issues do FQHC’s have with each of these? Models
Framework approach to problem solving
Value
Entire horizon addressed
Less “shooting off the hip”
Minimizes destructive passionate positions
Reduces potential for blame games and finger-pointing
Decreases bias
Increases buy in
Increases chances for sustaining change
Especially with pROduCtIviTY
Models
Framework approach to problem solving
Value
Entire horizon addressed
Less “shooting off the hip”
Minimizes destructive passionate positions
Reduces potential for blame games and finger-pointing
Decreases bias
Increases buy in
Increases chances for sustaining change
Especially with pROduCtIviTY
13. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #1: # of Hours Worked:
14. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER#2: Patient Supply: Patient supply
# of Patients seen by end of day
=(Scheduled patients) – (No shows) + (Walk ins)
15. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #2: Patient Supply:
16. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #3: Provider Speed:
17. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #3: Provider Speed:
18. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #3: Provider Speed:
19. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #4: Total Provider Work Volume Examples of “shiftable” work There are a number of functions performed by Providers either during or after a patient’s visit that, if completed by support staff, could assist them move patients faster.
For eg the Provider has to provide patient education on diet, exercise and preventative care e.g. pap smears, colon cancer screening, etc.
The Provider also has to update flow sheets that also cost him/her time.
And then he/she has to complete lab and procedure request forms, in addition to documenting them in the chart.There are a number of functions performed by Providers either during or after a patient’s visit that, if completed by support staff, could assist them move patients faster.
For eg the Provider has to provide patient education on diet, exercise and preventative care e.g. pap smears, colon cancer screening, etc.
The Provider also has to update flow sheets that also cost him/her time.
And then he/she has to complete lab and procedure request forms, in addition to documenting them in the chart.
20. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #4: Total Provider Work Volume Examples of “shiftable” work
21. PRODUCTIVITY DRIVER #4: Total Provider Work Volume Examples of “shiftable” work When we look at all the work our nursing staff has to do, would you say they are better of in prison or at work. Lets see what you think.When we look at all the work our nursing staff has to do, would you say they are better of in prison or at work. Lets see what you think.
22. SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION TO INCREASE PROVIDER PRODUCTIVITY Which
Which support staff?
How
How can they be best utilized to maximize productivity?
In the context of CHI’s experiences!
23. WHICH SUPPORT STAFF? Staff whose function have a direct or indirect impact on patient flow
Direct support: Nursing staff, Front desk staff
Indirect support: Medical records staff, Allied Professional staff, MIS staff Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
24. UNIT STAFFING STRUCTURE Multi-Provider units and Single-Provider sites
In Multi-Provider units
2 Providers
4 Patient Care Technicians (PCT)
1 LPN
1 Patient Financial Services Specialist (PFSS)
In single Provider sites
2 PCTs, 1LPN and 1 PFSS
PCTs cross-trained to perform most PFSS functions
RN’s serve as Clinical Coordinators
25. MEDIAN # OF SUPPORT STAFF PER FTE FP -as per MGMA MGMA’s 2001 Cost Survey, breaks down the median number of staff members per FTE physician
for family practices as shown below.
(Warning: Do not expect the sum of these numbers to equal
the overall median staff-per-FTE-physician ratio; that is determined separately.)
MGMA’s 2001 Cost Survey, breaks down the median number of staff members per FTE physician
for family practices as shown below.
(Warning: Do not expect the sum of these numbers to equal
the overall median staff-per-FTE-physician ratio; that is determined separately.)
26. EFFECTIVE SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION – HOW? Long list of options
Utilization of productivity model presents effective structure to understand utilization and to facilitate discussion Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
27. WHAT ROLE DOES SUPPORT STAFF PLAY WITHIN EACH OF THE 4 PRODUCTIVITY DRIVERS? Provider productivity depends on:
# of Hours Worked
Patient Supply
Provider Speed
Total Provider Work Volume
Models
Framework approach to problem solving
Value
Entire horizon addressed
Less “shooting off the hip”
Minimizes destructive passionate positions
Reduces potential for blame games and finger-pointing
Decreases bias
Increases buy in
Increases chances for sustaining change
Especially with pROduCtIviTY
Models
Framework approach to problem solving
Value
Entire horizon addressed
Less “shooting off the hip”
Minimizes destructive passionate positions
Reduces potential for blame games and finger-pointing
Decreases bias
Increases buy in
Increases chances for sustaining change
Especially with pROduCtIviTY
28. PROVIDER WORK VOLUME Issue: Costly and inefficient to use professional/higher paid staff to perform work that someone else could
GOAL
Move all “shiftable” work to the less expensive staff OR to patients
Strategy
Outside the box thinking
Look for best practices in other centers and in private sector Flow chart patient visit
Post in staff common area
Ask for input
Create final flow
Flow chart patient visit
Post in staff common area
Ask for input
Create final flow
29. PROVIDER WORK VOLUME 6 areas consume majority of Provider’s patient encounter time and can be performed by others
Ensuring availability of reports
Consults, labs, procedures, etc
Obtaining patient histories
Interval histories
Assessment of compliance with preventative health and disease specific guidelines
Completing defined components of physical exam
Patient education
Completion of requests for tests and procedures
Support staff can make a difference
CHI’s experience Flow chart patient visit
Post in staff common area
Ask for input
Create final flow
Flow chart patient visit
Post in staff common area
Ask for input
Create final flow
30. UTILIZATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF IN CHI- Check in/Registration process ALL patients
Review “quality care sheet”
Established patient
Due for Depression screening ? PHQ-9 given to patient
Due for Learning Needs Assessment ? Form given to patient
Advance Directives not formulated ? Form given to patient
New patient
New patient history form
Health maintenance education sheet
+ Depression screening, Advance Directives as well
New patient labs
Planning to implement
Disease specific hand out printed for patient
Patient decision support
Taking advantage of patient wait
31. EXAMPLE OF QUALITY CARE SHEET
32. HEALTH MAINTENANCE EDUCATION SHEET
33. UTILIZATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF IN CHI - Nursing Encounter Patient history review and update
Compliance with
Medication, Diet, Exercise, etc
Recent tests or procedures since last visit
Recent visit to E.R or Hospital
Recent surgery
Entry of information from paper forms into E.H.R.
New patient history form, PHQ 9, Learning needs assessment, etc
Value of use of E.H.R.’s documentation templates
34. EXAMPLE OF CUSTOMIZED E.H.R. TEMPLATES
35. UTILIZATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF IN CHI - Nursing Encounter Review of “quality care sheet” and Assessment of compliance with
Procedures e.g. Pap, Mammogram
Tests e.g. HbA1c, Lipids, Creatinine
A1c done at point of care
Specialist referrals e.g. Podiatry, Optometry
Procedures, Tests or Referrals ordered
Documented in record
Forms completed
Initiation of self management goal setting process
Tool presented to patient
36. EXAMPLE OF CUSTOMIZED E.H.R. TEMPLATE
37. UTILIZATION OF DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF IN CHI - Nursing Discharge Review of Provider’s Care Plan
Additional referrals, tests ordered
Print out of patient education handouts
Links to hand outs e.g. www.familydoctor.org
Print out of patient medication list
New patients, change in meds, etc
Education on available educational programs
Diabetes education; Chronic Disease Self Management Program for elderly, etc
38. UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT STAFF IN CHI - Post-Discharge Patient tracking
Abnormal labs and tests
Referrals
Management of Patient Registries
Selected diseases e.g. DM, HTN
Overdue for specific labs e.g. Lipids, HbA1c
High risk e.g. elevated BP, abnormal paps
Patient calls
Appointment reminders, follow up on treatment or invite to group medical visit or patient education sessions
Can we create a custom report for pts with last visit bp > XCan we create a custom report for pts with last visit bp > X
39. PROVIDER WORK VOLUME Summary of use of support staff in CHI during a patient’s visit
40. # OF HOURS WORKEDGoal: To ensure Providers are seeing patients max hours Lowest hanging fruitLowest hanging fruit
41. PATIENT SUPPLY Goal: maximize # of patients seen
# of patients seen
= scheduled – no shows + walk ins
Role of support staff
No shows
Educate patients on no show policy
Call patients >2days prior to appointment
Notify Providers of cancellations
Follow up on no shows
Walk ins
Ensure all walk ins sign in
Facilitate visit with effective triage
Obtain as much info as possible
Manage waiting time expectations Biggest bang for buckBiggest bang for buck
42. PROVIDER SPEED Goal: Increase # of patients a Provider can see per unit time
Role of support staff: Ensure
Minimum interruptions possible
Each Provider has and utilizes at least 3 exam rooms
All exam room fully equipped and similar
All support staff available during patient care time
Providers are respectfully nudged along
Providers are aware of accumulating backlog
Proactively inform patients of backlog and importance of keeping visit focused for sake of patients waiting
Environment for Providers to perform best work Most challenging to addressMost challenging to address
43. IN SUMMARY Support staff can be effectively utilized to increase Provider productivity through their ability to positively influence all 4 productivity drivers!
# of Hours Worked
Patient Supply
Provider Speed
Total Provider Work Volume
44. INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS Adequate Provider:Support staff ratio
Effective deployment of support staff
Training
Supporting policies and procedures
Inclusion of key components of expectations in job descriptions and evaluations
Commitment to success
Most challenging to addressMost challenging to address
45. MODELS OF EFFICIENT DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION Provider assignment models
Exam room assignment model
Broad roles model
Hybrid models
46. MODELS OF EFFICIENT DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION Provider assignment models
Support staff assigned to:
A particular Provider
Used in CHI’s single Provider sites
Group of Providers
Used in CHI’s multi-Provider units
Benefits of both types of Provider assignment models
Provider, Support Staff and Patient satisfaction
Easier to train staff
47. COMPARISON OF THE 2 TYPES OF PROVIDER ASSIGNMENT MODELS Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
48. MODELS OF EFFICIENT DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION Exam room assignment model
Support staff assigned to particular exam rooms regardless of Provider using room
Utilized in CHI’s Doris Ison Urgent Care Center
Benefits
Less distraction of support staff away from exam rooms for other duties
Support staff has better oversight of needs of patients in rooms; potential advantage with waiting time
Disadvantages
Potential patient dissatisfaction with inconsistencies in assigned support staff and Providers Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
Summary of drivers and productivity by Blake
Question is: how can support staff influence this.
First though: who is support staff
49. MODELS OF EFFICIENT DIRECT SUPPORT STAFF UTILIZATION Broad roles model
Support staff responsible for all the services and care for a given patient on day of visit
(Receptionist only welcomes patients)
Nursing support staff calls patient to an available exam room
Checks in patient
Collects co-pay
Completes vital signs and assessments
Performs lab work, procedures, etc after Provider encounter
Collects additional fees
Discharges patient
Works with another patient while Provider is with patient
50. INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS Adequate Provider: Support staff ratio
Effective deployment of support staff
Training
Structured and repetitive
Supporting policies and procedures
Required to sustain change
Inclusion of key components of expectations in job descriptions and evaluations
Critical to sustain change and to hold accountable
Commitment to success
Probably the most critical factor
Most challenging to addressMost challenging to address
51. WHERE DOES AN ORG START FROM? Establish a Productivity Task Force
Inclusive of key Leadership and Process owners
Utilize PI principle and methodologies; Reason
Helps ensure thorough problem analysis
Encourages all to be engaged
Solutions arrived at are more likely effective and sustainable
Define Productivity Goals
All must be on same page
Look at appropriate external benchmarks
Review Productivity Drivers
Keeps group focused
52. WHERE DOES AN ORG START FROM? Perform baseline analysis
Flow chart patient flow
Collect objective patient flow data
Use volunteers or students
Commence completion of worksheet
Address ALL components
# of Hours worked, Patient supply, Provider Speed and Total Work Volume
Consider prioritizing
However start from low hanging fruit
Define responsible persons
Be as detailed as possible
53. PRODUCTIVITY WORK SHEET
54. PRODUCTIVITY WORK SHEET
55. WHERE DOES AN ORG START FROM? Track progress by monitoring performance
Productivity, Revenue, Patient and Staff Satisfaction, Quality of Care, No show rate, Overtime hours
Provide feedback to care teams and leadership
Celebrate successes
Keep at it!
56. POTENTIAL CHALLENGES Follow through on action items
Ownership of components of productivity drivers
Finger pointing
“Providers Job” or “Nurses Job”
“Hyper-sensitivity” to productivity at cost of quality of care and meeting patients’ needs
Resources for patient flow studies
Consider volunteers, students
Build into staff work
Culture of limited staff appreciation
Adversely impacts “joy of work”, etc
57. “TAKE HOME MESSAGES” Improving Productivity in a CHC must not be quick fix
ALL the Productivity drivers must be individually addressed
Maximizing # of hours worked is a low hanging fruit
Ensuring an adequate patient supply presents best bang for buck
Improving Provider speed is challenging and may yield marginal benefit
Decreasing Provider work volume by shifting work ensures the best sustainability AND IS THE DRIVER MOST INFLUENCED BY SUPPORT STAFF
Key Ingredients for success with Effective Utilization of Support Staff:
Adequate Provider Support Staff Ratio
Effective deployment of staff
Elimination of ALL biases
Commitment to success No doubt that with these a chc can be successfulNo doubt that with these a chc can be successful
58. EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT STAFF TO INCREASE PROVIDER PRODUCTIVITYTHANK YOU COMMUNITY HEALTH OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
Mae K. Goins (mgoins@hcnetwork.org