environmental ethics n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Environmental Ethics PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Environmental Ethics

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 34
horace

Environmental Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

104 Views
Download Presentation
Environmental Ethics
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental Ethics & important types of environmental ethics Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  2. The roots of environmental degradation What are they? Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  3. Agriculture displaced sustainable foraging lifeways, beginning 10,000 years agoAgricultures destroyed ecosystems and the foraging societies that had co-evolved with themPaul Shephard Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  4. Western Monotheistic Religion? Critics cite 4 anti-nature tendencies in western religions Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  5. 1) Domination of Nature • Genesis: God commands humans to "fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing...” • After the great flood God says to Noah: the animals will dread and fear you, and I will give you dominion over "everything that creeps on the ground, and over all the fish of the sea." Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  6. 2) Rejection of animism and pantheism • Animists believe that every part of the environment, living and non-living, has consciousness or spirit. Therefore, all beings deserve reverence. • Pantheists identify deities with natural objects and processes. Therefore nature is sacred or holy and people should have reverence for it Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  7. 3) Wilderness is cursed; Pastoral, agricultural, and City landscapes are Holy, Promised Lands 4) The sacred is beyond the world - earth is devalued in favor of heavenly hopes Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  8. Christians & Jews respond • Our traditions promote a care-giving stewardship not domination of nature. (Noah story) • Some admit the general destructive tendency, but say: • Minority "traditions within the wider tradition" are nature-beneficent. • Both traditions are currently mutating into forms increasingly concerned with the environment Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  9. Western Philosophy -another culprit? Critics blame its “dualism,” viewing humans as separate from and superior to nature Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  10. Rene Descartes (1596-1650): believed that animals have no minds and cannot suffer Humans have minds and souls, they are different from animals His famous dictum -- `I think, therefore I am’ -- suggested to him that thought reveals not only existence, but also human superiority So for Descartes, HUMANS are separate from nature and superior to it. And the natural world became an objectified "thing." Some critics say this objectification of nature is a key to science and ‘progress’ Rene Descartes sering “Salah” Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  11. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was the father of the Scientific method. Critics say he promoted a view of nature as a machine. See, e.g., New Atlantis "a mechanistic utopia"--1624 Many passages reveal that he thought nature was like women and slaves: They should be bound into the service of men Many scholars think such thinking shaped the anti-nature views of Judaism and Christianity, and thus warped human-nature relations in the west Francis Bacon juga “Salah” Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  12. Akar-masalahkerusakanekologis :* industrial civilization* technology* patriarchy* hierarchy* overpopulation Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  13. Akar-masalahkerusakanekologis : * consumerism* socialism/capitalism* Agricultures * Pastoralism Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  14. DuatipeutamaEtikaLingkungan: Individualistic & Holistic Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  15. Both holistic and individualistic environmental ethics address -- Whose interests count? Whose interests must we consider? Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  16. I.e.: Who has ‘standing’?Human Individuals? • Anthropocentrism: The environment is valuable to the extent is useful or necessary for human well being • Usually "rationality" or some "intellectual" criterion is critical in the West for moral standing • E.g. Kant & Descartes: only humans have "consciousness" • William Blacksone: all have a right to a liveable environment (EE, 105) • Kantian, deontological defense of human rights. • Not much new here in the overall approach Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  17. Who has standing? Sentient animals? • Sentient animals are those who can experience pleasure and/or pain • Jeremy Bentham: an early utilitarian theorist, provided a basis for extending moral standing beyond humans • Peter Singer's "Animal Liberation" theory provides a utilitarian argument pro-Animal Liberation Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  18. Who has Standing?Entities with ‘Interests” • Living entities that have "interests" -- a good that can be harmed -- have moral standing • Christopher Stone:Individual natural objects, including trees, can have standing • Conservator/trustee notion analogous to mentally deficient humans • Tom Regan:Animals who are "subjects of a life" have a "right" to that life. Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  19. (1) Animal Liberation: How can you measure pleasure/suffering a perennial problem with utilitarianism (2) Animal Rights: boundary of moral considerability is very restrictive and many plants and animals left out. (3) Feinberg, Regan and Singer base standing on human traits: having interests, capacity to suffer, beings subjects-of-a-life" I.e.: only if animals are like us in some important way will we grant them standing Problems with individualistic approaches: Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  20. (4) How can we determine what the "interests" of a living thing are? How should we decide who should be the trustee for non-rational, morally considerable entities? (5) Individualistic approaches provide no basis for prioritizing concern for endangered species Problems with individualistic approaches: Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  21. Holistic Approaches -- the basic idea: The whole is greater (and more valuable) than the constitutive parts Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  22. TigaPendekatanHolistik • Biocentrism • life-centered ethics • Ecocentrism • ecosystem-centered ethics • Deep Ecology • ‘identification’ and kinship ethics Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  23. Precursors include Albert Schweitzer's "reverence for life" ethics and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics: stressing character traits; awe, the inherent worth of each life Paul Taylor's Respect for Nature (1986) Living things have a good of their own, a will to live, and end of their own. Thus they have inherent worth With this perspective comes morally responsible behavior toward nature. Also: (1) humans are member of earth's life community (2) all species part of interdependent ecological system (3) all life pursues own good in own ways (4) Humans not inherently superior (all life has moral standing) Biocentrism life centered ethics Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  24. Still pre-ecological not really focused on ecosystems, but on individual life forms. Biocentrism - key problem Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  25. Precursors: Baruch Spinoza Henry David Thoreau John Muir Aldo Leopold’s watershed Land Ethic, 1949"All ethics rest upon a single premise: that the individual is a member of a community of interdependent parts.” Leopold argued that ethics involves self-imposed limitations on freedom of action and is derived from the above recognition Ecocentrism: ecosystem centered ethics Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  26. A land-use decision "is right when it tends to preserve the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise." Leopold spoke of the land as an organism, as alive. "the complexity of the land organism" is the outstanding 20th century discovery." This is a mystical revelation that sounds like pantheism and anticipates James Lovelock’s Gaia hypothesis The Land Ethic: "changes the role of Homo Sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it. It implies respect for his fellow-members, and also respect for the [land-] community as such." Leopold’s ecosystem-centered ethics Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  27. Arguing the earth is a self-regulating living system that maintains the conditions for the perpetuation of life, James Lovelock advanced the Gaia Hypothesis. Although not intended as an ‘ethics,’ a biosphere-centered (large-ecocentric) ethics has been deduced from it, claiming: People ought not degrade this wonderful system in such a way that it can not function to keep its systems within the various delicate margins necessary for life Lovelock’s holistic planetary Gaia theory Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  28. Deep Ecology - Basic ideas • All life systems are sacred and valuable -- apart from their usefulness to human beings • All life evolved in the same way and thus, all are kin, with kinship obligations • All species should be allowed to flourish and fulfill their evolutionary destinies Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  29. Deep EcologyThe problem & solution • Anthropocentrism (and reformist approaches) destroy nature • A transformation of consciousness is needed, replacing anthropocentrism with a broader sense of the self • identity should be grounded nature • When we understand that we are part of nature, eco-defense, as self-defense, will follow Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  30. Holistic Approaches -- Key criticism: • Individuals get hurt when you ignore them in favor of wholes • This is the key criticism of all ends-focused theories • In environmental ethics, the common charge is of "eco-fascism"! Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  31. Ethics and Environmental Ethics The Gradual Extension of Moral Concern Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  32. Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  33. Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎

  34. The ‘Earth Charter’(as global example) www.earthcharter.org Sumber: www.clas.ufl.edu/users/bron/pp/ee2.ppt‎