1 / 33

Russian Ideological Attraction in the West

Russian Ideological Attraction in the West. Dr. Vincent Charles Keating PolitikStuen 26 March 2018. Other Researchers Involved in the Project. Dr. Olivier Schmitt Center for War Studies University of Southern Denmark. Dr. Katarzyna Kaczmarska Department of International Politics

helenv
Download Presentation

Russian Ideological Attraction in the West

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Russian Ideological Attraction in the West Dr. Vincent Charles Keating PolitikStuen 26 March 2018

  2. Other Researchers Involved in the Project Dr. Olivier Schmitt Center for War Studies University of Southern Denmark Dr. Katarzyna Kaczmarska Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University

  3. Unexpected Bromance? • “a bright and talented person without any doubt ... an outstanding and talented personality ... [and] the absolute leader of the presidential race.” • “It is always a great honor to be so nicely complimented by a man so highly respected within his own country and beyond.”

  4. Intellectual Puzzle • Similarities between Russian and the Soviet actions • Great power championing an openly illiberal message • Heavily involved in propaganda and subversion efforts to undermine Western liberal states/elites • US case unique • “Shining city on the hill”/“Leader of the free world” • Influence reached top levels of government • Levels of mobilization against the message orders of magnitudes below the Cold War • Why?

  5. Russia’s ‘Conservative Turn’ • Russia’s decades of “ideological emptiness” • Since 2011 Russia as leader of conservative, patriarchal and Christian Europe • Like Alexander III, Putin’s Russia as conservative pole in concert of great powers

  6. Russian Influence in the West • Primarily understood as • Propaganda • Portrays Russia positively and/or the West negatively • Disinformation • Confuses Western audiences with false stories • Generally seen together in academic and non-academic writing – “propaganda and disinformation” – since many activities will have both elements • Purpose is to ‘weaponize information’ to suit Russian political purposes

  7. Means of Russian Influence • “Firehose of falsehood model” - RAND • RT/Sputnik • RT looks like a standard news network • Runs both normal news stories and those that have propaganda purposes • “RT is darkly, nastily brilliant, so much more sophisticated than Soviet propaganda” • David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker • Social media • Use of groups/firms to cause confusion and spread propaganda

  8. Means of Russian Influence • Examples of Russian influence operations • Hired army of 1,000 web trolls to make up fake news about Hillary Clinton in swing states – Reuters • Provoked anger over the refugee crisis in Germany to oust Angela Merkel – NATO report • In response • European Union and NATO have set up counter-disinformation offices • Denmark and Sweden have agreed to cooperate to fight Russian propaganda

  9. Sharp Power • From report Sharp Power: Rising Authoritarian Influence (December 2017) National Endowment for Democracy • Describes China and Russia’s influence as not ‘hard,’ but not ‘soft’ either • Sharp power “pierces, penetrates, or perforates the political and information environments of targeted countries” • Influence not about attraction or persuasion, but distraction and manipulation

  10. Russian Soft Power? • Generally framed the other way around • Invasions of Georgia (2008) and Ukraine (2013) sign of soft power weakness • Cannot attract, so must use hard power resources

  11. Impossibility of Political Soft Power • “Russia’s influence does not display the emphasis on legitimacy and moral authority stipulated by Nye” (Grigas 2012) • “Freedom, democracy, rule of law, social stability and respect for human rights have become ‘a consumer basket’ of the modern world … Russia cannot export some model as an alternative ... because it has not developed any such model yet” (Kosachev, 2012) • Russia “possesses almost no political ‘soft power’ for its neighbors or partners” (Leichtova 2014) • “Russia is unable to make its domestic socio-economic and political model attractive and sell it to other nations.” (Sergunin, 2015) • “The main weakness of Russian strategy is the lack of soft power and of civilizational and cultural attractiveness” (Skriba 2016)

  12. What is Soft Power? • Joseph Nye (1990) • The power of attraction to a state based on the appeal of its • Culture • Political Values • Foreign Policies • Grants states “the ability to influence the behavior of others to get the outcomes one wants”

  13. Why Does Soft Power Work? • Nye gives several reasons explaining soft power’s effectiveness • Grants legitimacy and moral authority • Increases the possibility of persuasion • Lowers the cost of leadership by creating followership • Induces other states to see themselves as having a duty to ensure the success of the values • Induces other states to want to emulate the attractiveness, causing them to modify their preferences • Helps to manipulate the agenda by making opposing preferences seem too unrealistic

  14. What Generates Political Attractiveness? • Nye suggests two factors • Having political values that reflect universal values • Conducting foreign policy based on these universal values • States that fulfil both of these criteria are likely to have large soft power resources

  15. Universal Values • What are universal values? Nye argues that: • Soft power resources are contextual • Societies do not have uniform values • But all examples point to liberal democratic norms • “Many values like democracy, human rights, and individual opportunities are deeply seductive” • These are “powerful sources of attraction” • United States “advanced their values by creating a structure of international rules and institutions that were consistent with the liberal and democratic nature of the British and American economic systems.”

  16. Joseph Nye on Russia • China and Russia need to “be self-critical, and unleash the full talents of their civil societies” to increase soft power • Russian information warfare is a form of “negative soft power” • Attacks the values of others to reduce their attractiveness/soft power • For example, Russia’s attempts to delegitimize Western democratic processes • But too much propaganda is obvious, and reduces overall soft power

  17. Scholarship on Russian Soft Power • Focus on cultural soft power elements • Language • Mass/high culture • Russian diasporas • RT/Russian media • Orthodox church

  18. Scholarship on Russian Soft Power • Focus on the instrumentalization of soft power • Soft power is only generated by Russian policy endorsed by the regime and financed from the state budget • Examines exclusively the production side of soft power • Use of Western techniques to promote political views, like GONGOs • Operate ‘with the aim of subverting authentic debate, either by spreading regime messages in a nontransparent way or by crowding out authentic voices’ (Walker 2016) • Use of ‘soft coercion’ not to attract, but to exploit weaknesses in the governance of other states

  19. Effects of the Current Scholarship • Intellectually limits the scope of potential Russian soft power influence • Instrumentalization links capacities directly to the ability of the state to fund and promote them • So when the Russian government fell into recession, some argues that it left “Russian foreign policy in the near abroad with fewer ‘soft’ instruments” (Bratersky 2016). • Cultural focus leads to a focus primarily on post-Soviet space • Area most likely to be positively drawn to Russian cultural values

  20. Our Argument • Soft power scholarship has a liberal democratic bias that • Is directly replicated in the Russian soft power literature • Automatically eliminates the possibility that Russian values can be attractive • Leaves scholars with only cultural values and instrumental programs • There is evidence that groups throughout the West are affected by Russian soft power because we can see a link between • Their open admiration of Russian values • Their open support for Russian foreign policy

  21. Russia and Moral Conservatvism • Russia as inspiration to “traditional values activism” • Marie Le Pen: Putin shares “common values”, which are “the values of the European civilization”, in particular its “Christian heritage” • “courage, frankness, and the respect of identity and civilisation” • Jobbik: “Europe should get back to its own roots and rearrange its relationship with other traditional cultures that only exist in the East now” • Leader of Forza Nuova: “Moscow is the third Rome, and the role of Russia in history is to revive Christianity”

  22. Russia and Moral Conservatvism • Patrick Buchanan: “In the culture war for the future of mankind, Putin is planting Russia’s flag firmly on the side of traditional Christianity” • Links with anti-LGBT activists • American Family Association spokesman declared that Russia’s gay propaganda ban matched exactly the type of ‘public policy that we’ve been advocating’ • Ongoing overtures between Russia evangelical and conservative religious organizations in the United States

  23. Russia and Moral Conservatvism • Italian FronteNazionale supported Putin’s ‘courageous position against the powerful gay lobby’ • Poster campaign under the title “I’m with Putin!”

  24. Russia and Strong Leadership • Nigel Farage: Putin is world leader he most admired • “If you poke the Russian bear with a stick he will respond” • EU leaders “weak and vain” • Heinz-ChristanStrache: Putin “pure democrat with authoritarian style”

  25. Russia and Strong Leadership • December 2016 poll of Republicans • Popularity of Putin – 37% • Popularity of Obama – 17% • Vice President Mike Pence: “I think it’s inarguable that Vladimir Putin has been a stronger leader in his country than Barack Obama has been in this country” • Rudy Guiliani: when Putin “makes a decision and he executes it, quickly. Then everybody reacts. That’s what you call a leader. President Obama, he’s got to think about it”

  26. Support for Russian Foreign Policy • Russian soft power grants legitimacy and moral authority to its foreign policy • Crimea • Marine Le Pen: European Union had declared a Cold War on Russia with the sanctions • Position also openly shared by far-right leaders in Germany, Austria, Italy and the Netherlands • Trump: “the people of Crimea, from what I’ve heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were” • Carter Page (Trump foreign policy advisor): referred to the “so-called annexation” of Crimea

  27. Support for Russian Foreign Policy • Syria • Marine Le Pen: “It’s a relief for us to see Islamic State retreat, and how Russia has succeeded where the EU has totally failed” • Donald Trump: “If Putin wants to go and knock the hell out of ISIS, I am all for it, 100 per cent, and I can’t understand how anybody would be against it”

  28. Undervalued Russian Soft Power • Russia has political soft power attractiveness not only in its sphere of influence, but also throughout the West and in China • 2016 survey of 41 representatives European anti-establishment parties on both right and left found all of them to by ‘sympathetic to Vladimir Putin’s Russia’ (Dennison and Paradijs 2016) • Increasing authoritarian populism and fatigue over liberal democracy a potential boon for Russian soft power • Already taken advantage of through foreign funding of political parties • Potentially increases support for Russian foreign policies, particularly in the Ukraine

  29. Affects Mobilization against Russia • Ideological attractiveness affects the U.S. ability to mobilize against a clearly illiberal power like in the Cold War • More appealing illiberal ideology • Not ‘alien’ Marxist-Lenninism, but conservative values already in mainstream ideological spectrum • Growth in potential target audiences • Alignment with Russian conservative values and increasing communitarian populist sentiments (2017 poll: 49% Republicans consider Russia a friend/ally) • Competition with other security threats • Fight against terrorism reinforces strong leadership image and defense of nationalist/Christian values

  30. Conclusion • Ideological blind spot in soft power literature that biases attractiveness of liberal democracy • Reflected in all literature on Russian soft power, which assumes either impossibility of political soft power or focusses exclusively on cultural soft power • Russia should be seen as a potentially powerful symbol of authoritarian conservative democracy • A working model for right/far-right (left) supporters • Soft power as a potential force multiplier to propaganda and disinformation efforts • Those already attracted to ideology might be easier to influence

More Related