1 / 1

Let’s Cook! Minnesota

Jill May, MEd *; Sara Van Offelen , MPH, RD*; Weiyang Xie , MA; Betsy Johnson, MPH. Evaluation Results:

hedva
Download Presentation

Let’s Cook! Minnesota

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Jill May, MEd*; Sara Van Offelen, MPH, RD*; WeiyangXie, MA; Betsy Johnson, MPH • Evaluation Results: • A preliminary evaluation was conducted through pre, post and six-month participant surveys; 141 participants completed all three surveys. Focus groups were conducted with community partners, volunteers, and staff. • Comparison of participant survey results demonstrated that all three programs, SGC, CM and SGE, showed significant improvement at post and six month follow-up in: • Increased confidence in planning, shopping, preparing a healthy meal from scratch • Increased consumption of fruits and vegetables • Making a grocery list more often • Cooking meals for family instead of buying already prepared foods • Additionally, significant results were demonstrated by the cooking-based efforts (Simply Good Cooking and Cooking Matters®) at post and six month follow-up. Significant improvement was shown for: • Increased consumption of dark colored vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat or fat-free dairy foods • Cooking meals at home more often • Participants engaging in at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity daily • Increased snacking on fruits and vegetables • Analysis of the focus groups indicated: • Community partner agencies preferred cooking-based methods over traditional • Staff reported the cooking-based approach improved their visibility and energized their teaching • Partners observed that the cooking-based approach developed a sense of community among participants • While participants and volunteers liked the two cooking-based curricula equally, staff preferred the flexibility and ease of implementation of SGC. Let’s Cook! Minnesota • Program Objective: • Let’s Cook! Minnesota compared the feasibility and effectiveness of cooking-based education programs to a traditional nutrition education delivery model in rural communities. • Description: In 2007, the University of Minnesota Extension conducted focus groups (Brown & Marczak, 2007) whose findings indicated that adults served by the Simply Good Eating Program prefer hands-on experience in a social setting. The results led to the development of Simply Good Cooking (SGC), a nutrition education curriculum that teaches hands-on cooking skills as the foundation for cooking healthy family meals based on nutrient-rich foods. To evaluate program effectiveness, SGC and Cooking Matters® were compared to the Simply Good Eating curriculum. Cooking Matters® (CM) is a national program developed by Share Our Strength that is a chef-led cooking based nutrition education series. Simply Good Eating (SGE) is a knowledge and skill based curriculum that uses facilitation methods to deliver nutrition education to limited resource adults with children. • Methods: • For this study, the target audience was rural SNAP eligible adults with children. Participants were enrolled either in one program featuring cooking-based (SGC or CM) or knowledge-based (SGE) curriculum (comparison). Each participant was enrolled in a complete six-week education series in a small group facilitated by a Community Nutrition Educator (CNE). • During 2012 and 2013, 248 participants from three Minnesota regions (Grand Rapids, Brainerd, Moorhead) participated in this study. Comparing cooking-based nutrition education with traditional methods in rural communities • Lack of Confidence in Preparing Healthy Meals; pre, post, 6 mo. • Conclusion: • Cooking-based curricula were an effective method of conducting nutrition education. Notably, cooking-based curricula offered additional behavior outcomes in areas not observed in knowledge-based curriculum. No relapse in health promoting behaviors from post to six month follow-up was observed. Because much enthusiasm for cooking-based approaches was reported by staff, community partner agencies and participants, this approach is being expanded in the University of Minnesota Extension Simply Good Eating nutrition education program. • Frequency of Cooking Meals at Home; pre, post, 6 mo. “Having a cooking curriculum is awesome!” -Community Nutrition Educator “It’s not as hard to cook healthy as I thought.” -participant “It’s just as easy to make a healthy homemade meal as it is to make a non-healthy meal.” -participant Funded by USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Rural Health & Safety Education Grant Program

More Related