1 / 8

IFA Technical Session India: Where Are We Today?

IFA Technical Session India: Where Are We Today?. Nikhil V Mehta Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers 19 th April 2012. Timeline. 20th January: SC decision in Vodafone 17th February: Indian Government files review petition

Download Presentation

IFA Technical Session India: Where Are We Today?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IFA Technical SessionIndia: Where Are We Today? Nikhil V Mehta Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers 19th April 2012

  2. Timeline • 20th January: SC decision in Vodafone • 17th February: Indian Government files review petition • 9th March: Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance’s Report on the DTC recommends relaxations to the proposed Vodafone tax charge and the GAAR • 16th March: Indian Budget contains provisions to tax offshore share sales with retrospective effect from 1st April 1962, and introduces the GAAR from 1st April 2012 • 20th March: The Supreme Court dismisses the review petition: Vodafone gets back the funds it had deposited, together with interest • ? May: Finance Bill will become law

  3. Finance Bill Measures • GAAR • Treaty Claims • Capital Gains Extension

  4. GAAR • Very broad attack on “impermissible avoidance arrangements” • Onus on taxpayer to disprove avoidance • IAA may be countered as tax authorities see fit • Treaty override • Prescribed guidelines and conditions to be published • Effective 1st April 2013, but applies to “previous year” i.e. from 1st April 2012 • No grandfathering • No TAAR removal • No clearance procedure

  5. Tax Treaties • GAAR applicable to structures where location of residence of an entity has no “substantial commercial purpose” other than getting a tax benefit • Duration that treaty structure has been in place irrelevant c.f. Chief Justice’s comments in Vodafone in distinguishing investment and avoidance • New tax residence certificate must contain particulars to be prescribed by Indian tax authorities, but effective from 1st April 2012

  6. Capital Gains Extension • “Property” deemed always to have included any rights relating to an Indian company including rights of management • “Transfer” expanded to include any way of parting with an asset, directly or indirectly notwithstanding that it is legally achieved by a direct transfer of foreign shares • But even foreign shares are deemed always to have had an Indian situs if they derive their value from Indian shares • Withholding by non-residents deemed always to have been necessary • In essence, the Bill contains a heavy handed attempt to enact all the (unsuccessful) main arguments of the tax authorities in Vodafone

  7. Practicalities • Any exit by a foreign entity (including on a return of capital) before the Finance Bill is enacted has uncertain tax consequences • Caveat multinational sales of divisions even where the Indian component is small if the sale includes parting with rights over an Indian company • Even the SC decision in Vodafone did not remove the need for a tax indemnity for a purchaser willing not to withhold tax. Now likely to be replaced by withholding in any event in non-treaty situations, and indemnities in treaty situations unless there are sensible guidelines

  8. Practicalities • The hope is that the Indian Government will listen to the considerable noise made both by the private sector and by other Governments • They may have underestimated how much demand the new uncertainties will put on the tax authorities: even with the DTC, remarkably little was forthcoming on administration and due process

More Related