1 / 12

Summary

Summary. On-axis (x=y=0) specifications, normal, b n , and skew, a n Integrated quadrupole < 50 G Integrated sextupole < 75 G/cm Integrated octupole < 40 G/cm 2 Off-axis specifications 1 st integral of B y < 100 + 50*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm

hasana
Download Presentation

Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Summary • On-axis (x=y=0) specifications, normal, bn, and skew, an • Integrated quadrupole < 50 G • Integrated sextupole < 75 G/cm • Integrated octupole < 40 G/cm2 • Off-axis specifications • 1st integral of By < 100 + 50*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm • 1st integral of Bx < 40 + 75*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm • 2nd integral of By < 1.5e4+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm. • 2nd integral of Bx < 5e3+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm • 1st integral deriv. < 50+150*|x| G; |x|<2.5 cm, • Peak field transverse roll-off • dBy/dx < 11000+5500*|x| G/cm, |x|<2.5 cm (BL12) • d2By/dx2 < 15000+20000*|x| G/cm2, |x|<2.5 cm (BL12) • Accelerator physics group will review fields, once the ID is designed. • Accelerator physics group will review magnetic measurements plan.

  2. q L*q/2 q/2 L=1.1m 1st integral (I1) specification, x=y=0 • Feedback off: global orbit shift less than 10% beam size • Horizontal: Dx(s) ~ sqrt(b(s)b0)*I1/Br < 40 mm • I1h < 43 G*cm • Vertical: Dy(s) ~ sqrt(b(s)b0)*I1/Br < 3 mm • I1v < 11 G*cm • Feedback on; beam fixed at BPMs about L=1.1 m up and downstream of ID; local orbit shift less than 10% of beam size and angle • Horizontal: • Dx = L* I1/Br/2 < 40 mm … I1h < 727 G*cm • Dx’ = I1/Br/2 < 5 mrad … I1h < 100 G*cm • Vertical: • Dy = L* I1/Br/2 < sqrt(2.5e-3*.018mm*mrad*1.6m)=8.5 mm … I1v < 155 G*cm • Dy’ = I1/Br/2 < 0.1*sr’ = 1 mrad … I1v < 20 G*cm • SLS specified 20 G*cm and got 26 G*cm. • BL12 spec: • I1h < 100 G*cm; I1v < 40 G*cm BPM ID BPM

  3. Field integral specifications, x=y=0 • Gradient • BL4&7: 50 G • ALS W11: 50 G • SLS IVUN: 50 G • BL12&13: 50 G • Sextupole • BL4&7: 100 G/cm • ALS W11: 50 G/cm • SLS IVUN: 60 G/cm • BL12&13: 75 G/cm • Octupole • BL4&7: No specification, (150 G/cm2 for BL11) • ALS W11: 10 G/cm2 • SLS IVUN: 100 G/cm2 (measured 9 G/cm2) • BL12&13: 40 G/cm2 (tracking studies indicate that 200 G/cm2 would start to be a problem)

  4. Skew gradient • 50 Gauss would generate ey/ex = 0.0094% • In operations now, ey/ex = 0.047% (8.5 pm) • With all skew quads off, now, ey/ex = 0.27%

  5. For BL12 & 13: 100 + 50*|x| G*cm, |x|<2.5 cm; (ALS extended to 25 mm)

  6. Multipole tracking

  7. 1st integral derivative specification • BL4&7: 200+300*|x| G; |x|<2.5 cm, y=0 • ALS W11: 50+50*|x| G; |x|<2 cm • SLS IVUN: 50 G; |x|<2 cm • For BL12&13: 50+150*|x| G; |x|<2.5 cm

  8. 2nd field integral specification • BL4&7: 1e5+1.5e5*|x| G*cm2; |x|<2.5 cm, y=0 • From BL11 specs. • to control orbit • ALS W11: 1e4+5e3*|x| G*cm2; |x|<2 cm • for dynamic aperture; “somewhat hand-wavey” • SLS IVUN: 1.6e3 @x=y=0; 3.2e3; x=+/-1mm, y=+/-.5mm • to control orbit, (I guess, given range in x, y.) • BL12 considerations: • 2nd integral intrinsic to asymmetric device = Bpeak/k2 = 1.23e3 G*cm2 • 2nd integral from +/- 1rst integral spec on ends of ID = 1rst*length = 1.5e4 + 7.5e3*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm • Global orbit control: 2nd integral, I2, gives orbit distortion amplitude of x(s) = (I2/Br)*sqrt(b(s)/b0)/(2sinpn) ~ I2/Br < 10% of beam size = (40, 3) mm, (x, y). This gives I2< (4e4, 3e3) G*cm2, (x, y). • With orbit feedback: I2 generates an angular shift of about I2/(3*L*Br) < 0.1*s’ = (5,1)mrad. L=1.5 m = ID length. This gives I2< (1.8e4, 4.5e3) G*cm2, (x, y). • BL12 spec: • I2h< 1.5e4+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm. • I2v< 5e3+1e4*|x| G*cm2, |x|<2.5 cm.

  9. Pole width; transverse field roll-off • BL4&7: field roll-off specs., 1rst & 2nd deriv. • ALS W11: kx < 6.5 1/m • SLS IVUN: pole width >= 42 mm

  10. Field roll-off specification Field integral from transverse field roll-off: In BL11 max(dBy/dx)=0.6*max(By)/gap, which for BL12 would give max(dBy/dx)=11000 G/cm, so this specification should be achievable, even with narrow poles.

  11. Field roll-off specification, 2nd derivative Field integral from transverse field roll-off: This constraint is tighter than necessary, because the multipoles are known to be only odd normal multipoles. For example, the quadrupole term of 50 Gauss at x=0 would only make a b-beat of 0.2 %. I’ll relax the constraint: This constraint is still about three times tighter than the one used for BL4&7. In BL11 max(d2By/dx2)=max(By)/gap2, which for BL12 would give max(d2By/dx2)=33000 G/cm2, so this specification should be achievable, even with narrow poles.

  12. SLS IVUN specs.

More Related