1 / 20

Beyond bags of features: Adding spatial information

Beyond bags of features: Adding spatial information. Many slides adapted from Fei-Fei Li, Rob Fergus, and Antonio Torralba. Adding spatial information. Computing bags of features on sub-windows of the whole image Using codebooks to vote for object position Generative part-based models.

hagop
Download Presentation

Beyond bags of features: Adding spatial information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Beyond bags of features:Adding spatial information Many slides adapted from Fei-Fei Li, Rob Fergus, and Antonio Torralba

  2. Adding spatial information • Computing bags of features on sub-windows of the whole image • Using codebooks to vote for object position • Generative part-based models

  3. Spatial pyramid representation level 0 • Extension of a bag of features • Locally orderless representation at several levels of resolution Lazebnik, Schmid & Ponce (CVPR 2006)

  4. Spatial pyramid representation level 1 • Extension of a bag of features • Locally orderless representation at several levels of resolution level 0 Lazebnik, Schmid & Ponce (CVPR 2006)

  5. Spatial pyramid representation level 2 • Extension of a bag of features • Locally orderless representation at several levels of resolution level 1 level 0 Lazebnik, Schmid & Ponce (CVPR 2006)

  6. Scene category dataset Multi-class classification results(100 training images per class)

  7. Caltech101 dataset Multi-class classification results (30 training images per class) http://www.vision.caltech.edu/Image_Datasets/Caltech101/Caltech101.html

  8. visual codeword withdisplacement vectors Implicit shape models • Visual codebook is used to index votes for object position training image annotated with object localization info B. Leibe, A. Leonardis, and B. Schiele, Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation with an Implicit Shape Model, ECCV Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision 2004

  9. Implicit shape models • Visual codebook is used to index votes for object position test image B. Leibe, A. Leonardis, and B. Schiele, Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation with an Implicit Shape Model, ECCV Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision 2004

  10. Implicit shape models: Details B. Leibe, A. Leonardis, and B. Schiele, Combined Object Categorization and Segmentation with an Implicit Shape Model, ECCV Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision 2004

  11. Generative part-based models R. Fergus, P. Perona and A. Zisserman, Object Class Recognition by Unsupervised Scale-Invariant Learning, CVPR 2003

  12. Probabilistic model Partdescriptors Partlocations h: assignment of features to parts Candidate parts

  13. Probabilistic model h: assignment of features to parts Part 1 Part 3 Part 2

  14. Probabilistic model h: assignment of features to parts Part 1 Part 3 Part 2

  15. Probabilistic model Distribution over patchdescriptors High-dimensional appearance space

  16. Probabilistic model Distribution over jointpart positions 2D image space

  17. Results: Faces Faceshapemodel Patchappearancemodel Recognitionresults

  18. Results: Motorbikes and airplanes

  19. Representing people

  20. Summary: Adding spatial information • Spatial pyramids • Pro: simple extension of a bag of features, works very well • Con: no geometric invariance, no object localization • Implicit shape models • Pro: can localize object, maintain translation and possibly scale invariance • Con: need supervised training data (known object positions and possibly segmentation masks) • Generative part-based models • Pro: very nice conceptually, can be learned from unsegmented images • Con: combinatorial hypothesis search problem

More Related