1 / 14

Comparison with Theoretical CM diagram

Comparison with Theoretical CM diagram. Galactic Astronomy #6.1.3 Jae Gyu Byeon. Isochrone. The Morphology of G.C. CMD : All star formed single epoch Choose initial abundances for the chemical element For heavy element, initial helium abundance Evolve the population forward in time

Download Presentation

Comparison with Theoretical CM diagram

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparison with Theoretical CM diagram Galactic Astronomy #6.1.3 Jae Gyu Byeon

  2. Isochrone • The Morphology of G.C. CMD : All star formed single epoch • Choose initial abundances for the chemical element • For heavy element, initial helium abundance • Evolve the population forward in time • Solving the stellar structure equation • Keeping track of the chemical evolution • For each step, calculate the luminosities and colors • The curve connecting all the stars in the CMD is called an “Isochrone” from the Greek for “same time”

  3. Isochrone • If assumed initial chemical composition and stellar structure calculations is correct, • Comparing isochrones to observed sequences : Powerful tool • For measuring the ages of G.C • For testing our understanding of the basic physics of stellar structure. • Isochrones have been calculation for a wide range of different metallicities, age, and physical assumptions • Yonsei-Yale group, BASTI group, Victoria group

  4. BASTI Isochrones α Enhanced Models Canonical Models Z = 0.01 Y = 0.259 [Fe/H] = -0.60 [M/H] = -0.25 η= 0.4

  5. BASTI Isochrones α Enhanced Models Canonical Models Z = 0.001 Y = 0.246 [Fe/H] = -1.62 [M/H] = -1.27 η= 0.4

  6. BASTI Isochrones α Enhanced Models Canonical Models η= 0.4 Red solid lines Z = 0.01 Y = 0.259 [Fe/H] = -0.60 [M/H] = -0.25 Blue solid lines Z = 0.001 Y = 0.246 [Fe/H] = -1.62 [M/H] = -1.27

  7. Y2 Isochrones Scaled Solar Models Z = 0.02 Y = 0.27 [Fe/H] = 0.046 [α/H] = 0.0

  8. Y2 Isochrones Scaled Solar Models Z = 0.001 Y = 0.232 [Fe/H] = -1.289 [α/H] = 0.0

  9. Y2 Isochrones α Enhanced Models Z = 0.001 Y = 0.232 [Fe/H] = -1.758 [α/H] = 0.6

  10. Y2 & BASTI Isochrones Scaled solar Models [α/H] = 0.0 Age = 0.1, 0.7, 2.0, 10 Gyr Y2 Isochrones Z = 0.02 Y = 0.27 [Fe/H] = 0.046 Red solid lines BASTI Isochrones Z = 0.0198 Y = 0.2743 [Fe/H] = 0.06 Blue solid lines

  11. Y2 & BASTI Isochrones Scaled solar Models [α/H] = 0.0 Age = 0.1, 0.7, 2.0, 10 Gyr Y2 Isochrones Z = 0.001 Y = 0.232 [Fe/H] = -1.288 Red solid lines BASTI Isochrones Z = 0.001 Y = 0.246 [Fe/H] = -1.27 Blue solid lines

  12. Comparision between Isochrone and RGB, HB • Unable to model accurately the deep convective layers and mass loss in giant star • The match between calculation and observation becomes rather poor • Vertical RGB to depend on metallicity • Most metal-poor clusters have the bluest RGBs • The line blanketing effects of heavy elements • Poorer for the RGB than it is for the MS and SGB • Still-later stages of stellar evolution : discrepancies grow

  13. Comparision between Isochrone and RGB, HB • The Helium Flash • Instantaneous mass loss and a rearrangement of the structure • Not possible to follow the evolution of a star from the RGB on to the HB • This transition is treated in a semi-empirical manner. • MRG : Mass of tip of RGB • Mc : Mass of hydrogen-depleted helium • ΔM : lost a mass from its atmosphere • MHB = MRG - ΔM • A spred in values of ΔM • Probability distribution of MHB (Eq. 6.1)

  14. Comparision between Isochrone and RGB, HB • These HB calculations explain the variation in HB color with cluster metallicity • This semi-empirical approach allows us to understand many of the features of the HB • The simple mass-loss model also fails to explain the differences in HB color seen in clusters with identical metallicities

More Related