1 / 12

REFORMING A DISABILITY BENEFITS/SUPPORT SYSTEM

This forum discusses the need to reform the disability benefits/support system. It addresses the rising prevalence and dependency rates, incentive structures for administrators, ALJs, and lawyers, and suggests early intervention and reformulating public finance questions.

greenleem
Download Presentation

REFORMING A DISABILITY BENEFITS/SUPPORT SYSTEM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REFORMING A DISABILITY BENEFITS/SUPPORT SYSTEM Forum on the Definition of Disability Social Security Advisory Board Dirksen Senate Office Building April 14, 2004 C. Eugene Steuerle The Urban Institute

  2. Background: Continually Rising Prevalence & Dependency Rates • An indicator that something is out of sorts • Either we are denying too many people today • Or we will be including too many people tomorrow

  3. Background: Continually Rising Prevalence & Dependency Rates • Social Security predictions of DI prevalence unrelated to actual prevalence of disability

  4. Background: Continually Rising Prevalence & Dependency Rates • Adult dependence rate on government programs rising with aging • May approach ½ of entire population mainly dependent upon government • Not necessarily progressive • Will lead to cutbacks simply because of declining revenue support

  5. The Incentive Structure: Administrators, ALJs, Plaintiffs’ Lawyers • Incentives generally in direction of greater prevalence • A test: put yourself in the role of an ALJ • The analogy to welfare reform (David Stapleton) • Perhaps the crucial step: • Governors’ decisions to rate welfare departments by how many people they got off of welfare rather than onto it

  6. The Incentive Structure: Administrators, ALJs, Plaintiffs’ Lawyers • SUGGESTIONS • Hold sessions for retired ALJs & others involved in administrative system • Make examination of incentives for all parties part of EI & other experiments • Consider revamping reward structure for all administrators, ALJs and lawyers

  7. The Incentive Structure: Participants • DI analogy to Ticket-to-Work and EITC/welfare reform • Common Conclusions • Wedge between working & not working crucial • Small incentive changes not enough to move many people over hurdle • Untested Differences • Carrots and sticks used in EITC/welfare reform • Cash system turned on its head: cash benefits (EITC) mainly for workers

  8. The Incentive Structure: Participants • SUGGESTIONS: • Measure replacement rates relative to potential, not just prior, employment • Consider experiments with larger differentials (e.g., grant a small group option of permanent, perhaps smaller, DI benefit regardless of work response) • Consider alternative benefit mixes

  9. Reformulating the Public Finance Question • Researchers too much like politicians: never wanting to identify “losers” • Good public finance research would offer expenditure-neutral alternatives, even when impractical politically • Otherwise always mixing positive and normative analysis

  10. Reformulating the Public Finance Question • SUGGESTIONS: • Require researchers to report results and make policy recommendations first on an expenditure-neutral basis • Later they can suggest higher spending if worthwhile on a marginal basis • All experiments should be based upon some possibility of bringing to scale

  11. Early Intervention • Lessons from the private sector: private disability compensation programs • Early intervention important • “Manage cases against risk” • Psychology of “dropping out” • The formation of habits & friendships • All costs, including administrative, calculated in overall benefit-cost analysis (in private insurance, insures expenses do not exceed available premiums)

  12. Early Intervention • SUGGESTIONS: • Measure approaches & abilities of counselors in EI programs • Psychological factors are often more important than economic • Count all administrative costs when performing cost/benefit analysis • Count all (including non-SSA) economic and psychological gains

More Related