190 likes | 205 Views
Explore the process, benefits, and outcomes of benchmarking to drive improvement and cost optimization in operations. Learn about successful implementation strategies, site selections, best practices, and key success factors.
E N D
Configuration Control Process Benchmarking Project Summary Presented By: Vic Fregonese PSEG Nuclear, LLC 8th Configuration Management Benchmarking Conference October 29 – 31, 2001 Raleigh, NC
Topics • Benchmarking Process and Approach • CC Project Details • Site Selection and Visits • Focus Areas • Process Map • Good Practices • Common Contributors
Benchmarking • “The Continuous Process of MeasuringProducts, Services, and Practices Against the Toughest Competitors or Those Companies Recognized as Industry Leaders” • The Purpose of Benchmarking is to make CHANGE, resulting in IMPROVEMENT • By implementing Good Practices, plants optimize O&M Costs which maintains or increases their asset value
Benchmarking Approach • Screen Candidates Using Peer Review Team • Identify Details via Survey • Plot Cost versus Performance • Electric Utility Cost Group - Cost Source • Transfer Best Practices- Report/Web/Workshops
Benchmarking Process • Compressed Schedule- 90 Days • Single Implementing Peer Group • Planning • Data/Process Mapping • Site Selection • Visits • Report • Workshop/Forum
Keys to Success • Standardization • Sharing Experience • Refining the Performance Model
Project Team • Design Managers and Program Engineers/Managers • INPO • EPRI • NEI
CCB Project History • CMBG Briefed 1998, 1999, 2000 • Task Force Formed by NEI Economic Points of Contact and CMBG members • Project Schedule: • Meeting 1 -4/24-25 • Meeting 2 - 5/15-17 • Visits - June • Meeting 3- 7/10-12 • Report - August • Workshop in with CMBG October 29-31
Selection Criteria • Survey Score = CC Index • O&M Cost/ FTE’s for CC
Sites Visited • Byron • Harris • McGuire • Palo Verde • Salem/Hope Creek • Sequoyah
SIMPLER - Focus Areas • Self Assessment • Indicators • Modifications • Procedures/Process • Limit Backlog • Effective Translation Into Plant Operation Configuration • Records/Documents
Featured Good Practices • Byron -Modification Closeout • Harris -Engineering Product Review • McGuire-DART Training • Palo Verde- System Teams • Salem/Hope Creek-Integrated Engineering Desktop • Sequoyah-Technical Review Committee
Featured Good Practices • Byron – Testing Control • Harris – Change Management • Harris – Vendor Manual Software • McGuire – BEST • Salem/Hope Creek – Quality Scoring • Sequoyah – EIP
Common Contributors • S: Product Quality • I: Goals Tied to Personal Performance • M: Mgmt. Review/Prioritization • P: INPO/EPRI and Common Procedures • L: Selection Criteria/Prioritization • E: T-Mod Control • R: Electronic Access and Indexing
Other Thoughts • Integration of ERP Software with Engineering Data, Work Mgmt., and Document Retrieval/Control • Engineering Work Management • Interface with ER Process • Long Range Planning • Culture
Future Direction • CMBG Conference • AP-929 Revision • Equipment Reliability Benchmarking