1 / 4

Past tense processing and language breakdown: What does ‘normal’ look like?

Past tense processing and language breakdown: What does ‘normal’ look like?. Jennifer Aydelott Rob Leech Maciej Trzaskowski. Patient Study. Past Tense Debate: distinct mechanisms for regular and irregular verbs?

gotzon
Download Presentation

Past tense processing and language breakdown: What does ‘normal’ look like?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Past tense processing and language breakdown:What does ‘normal’ look like? Jennifer Aydelott Rob Leech Maciej Trzaskowski

  2. Patient Study • Past Tense Debate: distinct mechanisms for regular and irregular verbs? • goal: reconcile findings from studies of morphological processing and lexical priming in aphasia • stimuli: spoken word pairs • tasks: explicit judgment, implicit priming • types of linguistic information: morphology, phonology, semantics • participants: LH damage + language impairment  pattern of brain activity in healthy adults?

  3. Proposed Design • 16-20 healthy adult volunteers • 3 explicit judgment tasks [yes/no button press] • morphology [past tense match?] • irregular: sank-sink / sinked-sink / threw-sink • regular: linked-link / lank-link / showed-link • phonology [same?] • pseudo-irregular: pink-pink / pank-pink / twun-pink • pseudo-regular: mink-mink / minked-mink / bunned-mink • semantics [meaning related?] • relationship: nest-bird / sky-bird / vase-bird • + baseline • noise discrimination [same?] • noise pairs: white-white / pink-pink / white-pink / pink-white

  4. Proposed Design • whole brain fMRI • semi-sparse sampling (TR=5s, TE=50ms, 3x3x4mm resolution) • mixed blocked & event-related design • 162 trials per task (minimum 27 trials per condition) • task blocks interspersed with baseline • trial order pseudorandomized • task order counterbalanced • full factorial analysis (GLM) block 1 54 trials 4.5 mins block 2 54 trials 4.5 mins block 3 54 trials 4.5 mins task 1 task 2 task 3 baseline 2 mins baseline 2 mins

More Related