1 / 28

Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Knowledge, Power & Social Change through Community-based Research

Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Knowledge, Power & Social Change through Community-based Research. ACT research Day May 7, 2009 Josephine Pui-Hing Wong Committee of Accessible AIDS Treatment & University of Toronto. Community-based Research in Health (CBR). Mainstreaming? Buzzing rhetoric?

glora
Download Presentation

Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Knowledge, Power & Social Change through Community-based Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Moving Beyond Rhetoric:Knowledge, Power & Social Change through Community-based Research ACT research Day May 7, 2009 Josephine Pui-Hing Wong Committee of Accessible AIDS Treatment & University of Toronto

  2. Community-based Research in Health(CBR) Mainstreaming? Buzzing rhetoric? Empowerment? WHY TALK ABOUT IT?

  3. My basic assumptions: • Human actions are NOT entirely autonomous or totally conscious – we are autonomous within constraints • Power is exercised through ‘social relations’ and NOT held as a static entity • Social transformation to reduce human suffering and inequities is POSSIBLE • CRTICAL SOCIAL RESEARCH is one way to achieve emancipation and liberation

  4. CBR: Community & Research – What’s the link? Community Research

  5. UnpackingThe notion of ‘community’? symbolic political COMMUNITY relational

  6. Community as ‘Symbolic’ The notion of ‘community’: • is general & imprecise • it gives way to our imaginations • it constructs meanings • it creates identities

  7. Community as ‘Political’ The notion of ‘community’: • it constructs boundaries [insider /outsider] • ‘community’ vs. ‘government’ or ‘academia’, etc. • it defines similarities & differences • it functions as a ‘discourse’  policy & practice

  8. Community as ‘Relational’ CON T E X T S

  9. Unpacking the notion of ‘research’: Rhetoric or Truth? • “Knowledge is power.” • “Programs & services must be based on evidence.” • “Research informs policy.”

  10. Research as ‘process’ & ‘outcome’ • The practical processes of CBR are similar to other community capacity building processes – partnerships, resources & power relations • Equitable and empowering partnership is dependent on ‘mutual’ understanding in all aspects of the process, including how to define: • research goals, topics, methods, application of results, ownership of ‘knowledge’.

  11. Doing Research: A Question of Paradigms • Our basic beliefs about the nature of reality: • What is ‘truth’? • Whatcan we know about ‘reality’ or ‘truth’? • The relationship between the knower and what is known or knowable: • How can the knower find out what can be known? • What is the nature of knowledge? (Isreal et al., 1998) Does the chosen research paradigm reflect thevalues, beliefs & interests of your ‘community’?

  12. Social Research in HIV/AIDS: Tension in Paradigms Positivistic Paradigm • Individuals have autonomouschoices • Reality is stable and can be generalized into cause & effects • Research as “neutral” assessment of what is true or untrue • Researchers as “objective” knowers not influenced by self-interests Critical-Social Paradigm • Individuals have choices within social constraints • Reality is shaped by historical & social power relations  unstable • Research is mediated by values & power • Researchers ‘reflexively’ apply theories & concepts to reveal “hidden” structures, ideologies & interests

  13. Mainstreaming of CBR: Critical questions remain • Is the research community ‘based’ or community ‘placed’? • What is the role for ‘community’ stakeholders? • How are the power ‘relations’ within the research structured? • Whose interests are at the heart of the research?

  14. The ABCs of Critical Community-based Research (CCBR) • Acknowledge power relations in society • Build on community strengths & equitable partnerships (GIPA & MIPA**) • Coherent paradigm & critique of social inequities & oppressions • Dialogical approach  participatory • Engage members in emancipatory action and collective empowerment

  15. Critical Community-based ResearchCCBR • Researchers • Service providers • Community stakeholders & members • Policy makers LOOKING TOGETHER FROM ABOVE; FROM WITHIN; LOOKING IN FROM THE OUTSIDE; LOOKING OUT FROM THE INSIDE.

  16. The Roots of CBR: Action & Emancipation • Kurt Lewin (1948) – Action Research • Paulo Freire (Brazil); Orlando Fals- Borda (Columbia); Rajesh Tandon (Asia) – Participatory Research -- emancipation In other word, its roots were ‘critical’.

  17. Research as a Political Process:Struggles for limited resources & legitimacy State knowledge Academia evidence Research v v v legitimacy & resources Activists v v v v PHAs, youth, LGBTTTQ, etc.

  18. CCRB as a Social Process • Dialogue  critical understanding of individual and collective conditions of existence • Reveal ‘hidden’ structures  sufferings of marginalized & oppressed groups • Reveal the ‘logic’ of social practice of both the dominant & the dominated groups • Identify and act on collective solutions – at individual, organizational & societal levels Knowledge translation & exchange (KTE) is an integrated component of CCBR

  19. Empowerment through CCRB: an example Committee for Accessible AIDS Treatment (CAAT) • A coalition of 30 Ontario based organizations, formed in 1999 • Shared vision: health equity for marginalized PHAs • Goals: improve access through research-practice-policy integration CAAT - http://www.hivimmigration.ca/index.html

  20. Transformation Through Collective Action: Best Practices in Migration, HIV and Mental Health Project • 2001: Action research on Access to HIV Treatment (funded by OHTN) • HIV Treatment Access Program (with PWA) • HIV & Immigration Service Access Training (with RPCHC) • Access to legal information on immigration (with HALCO) • research needs – mental health needs of IRN-PHAs • 2004: Pilot study with immigrant, refugee & non-status people living with HIV/AIDS (IRN-PHAs) & service providers (funded by OHTN) • research topic identified by IRN-PHAs & service providers • development of multi-component participatory action research 2005-7: Study on Best Practices in Migration, HIV and Mental Health 2007-8: Knowledge Translation & Exchange (KTE) Project (funded by OHTN & Wellesley Institute Current: Engaging Ethnoracial Faith-based, Media & Social Justice Leaders to reduce HIV related stigma & discrimination (funded by OHTN).

  21. CCBR Research & KTE in Action: 3. Report Components 1&2 Research Findings 1. Sharing Life Experience 2. Capacity Building 4. Concept Mapping I: Generate Statements • 22 IRN-PHAs • 6 research team members 5. Concept Mapping II: Ranking Statements 6. Concept Mapping III: Interpretation 7. Best Practices Framework

  22. Producing & sharing knowledge is NOT a new phenomenon … Who should tell the stories & how?

  23. Knowledge Translation & Exchange (KTE) - Transformation Through Collective Action • 5 IRN-PHA RA • 15 KTE Ambassadors • service provider/researcher team

  24. Planting a seed for contemplation CCBR as a Spiritual Process

  25. self- transcendence compassion for self & others connectedness commitment for peace & social justice Some universal underpinnings of spirituality across all faiths & philosophies

  26. Universal underpinnings of spirituality: compatible with CCBR principles self- transcendence compassion for self & others • advocacy • dialogue • self-reflexivity • peer support connectedness commitment for peace & social justice • partnerships • collaboration • capacity-building • collective action • reveal & critique inequity & injustice

  27. From “Lost in Translation” to “Flourishedthrough Translation”. Engage in Community Consultation Participate in Research Co-investigate evidence, Co-develop best practice recommendations Translate Knowledge to Action KTE as an organic process through meaningful ‘community’ and PHA participation in every step of research

  28. You have been a GREAT listener! Thank you. Josephine Think about how collectively we can change the world thru CCBR! CAAT .

More Related