1 / 26

Baseline architecture of ITER control system

Baseline architecture of ITER control system Anders Wallander , Franck Di Maio, Jean-Yves Journeaux, Wolf-Dieter Klotz, Petri Makijarvi, Izuru Yonekawa ITER Organization (IO) 13067 St. Paul lez Durance, France. Basics. Goal: Demonstrate feasibility of fusion as an energy source

giolla
Download Presentation

Baseline architecture of ITER control system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Baseline architecture of ITER control system Anders Wallander, Franck Di Maio, Jean-Yves Journeaux, Wolf-Dieter Klotz, Petri Makijarvi, Izuru Yonekawa ITER Organization (IO) 13067 St. Paul lez Durance, France

  2. Basics Goal: Demonstrate feasibility of fusion as an energy source (Q=10 means output power equal 10 times input power) Schedule: 10 years construction phase First plasma 2019, first D-T plasma 2027 Collaboration: CN, EU, IN, JA, KO, RF, US

  3. This is ITER

  4. This is the ITER Agreement 140 slices

  5. A bit of interface problems

  6. Island mentality

  7. Missing Items

  8. The control system can help to fix this

  9. The control system is horizontal

  10. it connects to everything

  11. it identifies and may eliminate missing items

  12. it integrates

  13. and is the primary tool for operation

  14. …all these links work But this will only work if… Standards Architecture

  15. Finite set of “Lego blocks”, which can be selected and connected as required

  16. Plant System I&C Is a deliverable by ITER member state. Set of standard components selected from catalogue. One and only one plant system host.

  17. ITER Subsystem is a set of related plant system I&C

  18. Plant Operation Network is the work horse general purpose flat network utilizing industrial managed switches and mainstream IT technology

  19. Plant System Host is an IO furnished hardware and software component installed in a Plant System I&C cubicle. There is one and only one PSH in a Plant System I&C. PSH runs RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) and EPICS (Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System) soft IOC (Input Output Controller). It provides standard functions like maintaining (monitoring and controlling) the Common Operation State (COS) of the Plant System. PSH is fully data driven, i.e. it is customized for a particular Plant System I&C by configuration. There is no plant specific code in a PSH. PSH has no I/O.

  20. Fast Controller is a dedicated industrial controller implemented in PCI family form factor and PCIe and Ethernet communication fabric. There may be zero, one or many Fast Controllers in a Plant System I&C. A Fast Controller runs RHEL and EPICS IOC. It acts as a channel access server and exposes process variables (PV) to PON. A Fast Controller has normally I/O and IO supports a set of standard I/O modules with associated EPICS drivers. A Fast Controller may have interface to High Performance Networks (HPN), i.e. SDN for plasma control and TCN for absolute time and programmed triggers and clocks. Fast Controllers involved in critical real-time runs a RT enabled (TBD) version of Linux on a separate core or CPU. A Fast Controller can have plant specific logic. A Fast Controller can act as supervisor for other Fast Controllers and/or Slow Controllers. The supervisor maintains Plant System Operating State.

  21. High Performance Computer are dedicated computers (multi core, GPU) running plasma control algorithms.

  22. High Performance Networks are physically dedicated networks to implement functions not achievable by the conventional Plant Operation Network. These functions are distributed real-time feedback control, high accuracy time synchronization and bulk video distribution.

  23. Estimate of system size ~1000 computers connected to PON

  24. Timing System Main requirements: 50 ns RMS absolute time synchronization (off-line correlation of diagnostics) • It is common practice by large experimental facilities to invent • their own home made timing system and we want to avoid that • We believe that IEEE 1588-2008 (PTP v2) provides a • COTS alternative fulfilling ITER requirements • IEEE 1588, 2008, provides 50 ns RMS synchronization accuracy • of absolute time over Ethernet with possibility to program triggers • and clocks synchronized with this absolute time using COTS • This standard is being endorsed by more and more suppliers and • we will see many new COTS products in the future • This also provides an evolution path to White Rabbit being • developed by CERN • Therefore we have baselined IEEE 1588-2008 for TCN and will confirm • this decision by further evaluations in 2nd half of 2010

  25. Distributed real-time plasma control Main requirements: control cycles Hz-kHz, peak bandwidth 25 MB/s, number of nodes participating 50-100 • ITER distributed plasma control main characteristics • decoupling and separation of concern • data driven • multiple in multiple out (MIMO) • non intrusive probing • flexibility • scalability • simulation support • minimize latency and jitter • Two schools of thoughts for real-time network • Reflective memory • Ethernet based (e.g. UDP, RTnet) • Decision on technology delayed while watching the market • Further test beds and evaluations in 2011

  26. Conclusions • The non-technical peculiarities of the ITER project has • been addressed • Components making up ITER control system have • been defined and a baseline architecture outlined • Flexibility in combining these standard components • have been emphasized • Having a set of standard components and a sound • architecture will ease integration • Issues on timing and feedback control have been • touched • We intend to continue working with our partners all over the world to make the ITER control system contribute to ITER success. • https://www.iter.org/org/team/chd/cid/codac/Pages/

More Related