a step back to reality n.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
A Step Back to Reality ?

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 32

A Step Back to Reality ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

A Step Back to Reality ?. The Work of Malthus and Ricardo. The Struggle between two Wealthy Classes. The Landowners and the nouveaux rich as the Landowners viewed the Industrialist The Industrialists were building large factories and attempting to obtain status in political arena

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A Step Back to Reality ?' - gerda

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
a step back to reality

A Step Back to Reality ?

The Work of Malthus and Ricardo

the struggle between two wealthy classes
The Struggle between two Wealthy Classes
  • The Landowners and the nouveaux rich as the Landowners viewed the Industrialist
  • The Industrialists were building large factories and attempting to obtain status in political arena
  • Landowners as the original power class controlled the political power
  • Industrialist complained price of food was high
brilliance or gloom
Brilliance or Gloom
  • The Wonderful World Adam Smith Envisioned was being embraced by some philosophers
  • A minister by the name of William Godwin saw the poverty around him but was convinced that the world’s future was much brighter
brilliance or gloom1
Brilliance or Gloom
  • Godwin foresaw a future where
    • [t]here will be no war, no crime, no administration of justice, as it is called, an no government. Besides this there will be no disease, anguish, melancholy, or resentment
  • He even dared state that there would be no longer a need for a marriage contract. His ideas were controversial but due the high cost of his pamphlet very few read it and thus he was not prosecuted by the Privy Council
privy council
Privy Council
  • The Privy Council is one of the oldest parts of British Government, it has, over time, adapted to reflect the fact that the United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy.
  • It deals with many of the legal issues the government must deal with
  • Both the theories of Malthus and those proposed by Ricardo led Thomas set a much gloomier outlook than that proposed by Adam Smith, William Godwin, and Condorcet
dismal science economics
Dismal Science: Economics
  • According to Heilbroner, as well as many other, Thomas Carlyle after reading Thomas Malthus book described economics as “the “dismal science”
  • However, recent work by David Levy, Journal of History of Economic Thought, 2001 argues that Carlyle did coin the phrase
dismal science economics1
Dismal Science: Economics
  • However, Levy argues that Carlyle used the term to refer to the fact that classical economists’ view on race, not their views on population. He called it a dismal science because economics saw all races as equally capable of entering into trades whereas Carlyle believed that the races were different and that slavery was natural for blacks.
  • Recall that Malthus’ hypothesis could be summarized simply by
    • The fact that while population grows at a geometric rate, food production grew at an arithmetic rate



Growth rate



thomas malthus
Thomas Malthus
  • The ideas of Malthus influenced many of his time
  • Among them, Charles Darwin and David Ricardo
  • Darwin in the development of his theory of natural selection was greatly influenced by the observation made by Malthus that like plants and animals, humans can overproduce offspring if left unchecked.
malthus and ricardo
  • Malthus and Ricardo were above all great friends.
  • They disagreed with each other on many points which in reality where more an issue of style rather than substance.
  • However they did have one very important difference of opinion.
malthus and ricardo1
  • This difference was in the fact that David Ricardo supported the so called Says Law while Malthus did not
  • We will discuss the Says Law in greater detail later on
david ricardo 1772 1823
David Ricardo


  • Son of Jewish immigrant stock broker
  • Broke ranks with family and became a Unitarian to marry a Quaker woman he fell in love with
  • took modest stake and build into a fortune
  • invested in Securities and Real Estate
  • In 1779, while on vacation, read The Wealth of Nation by Adam Smith
  • Got interested in economics as a “hobby”
house of commons
House of Commons
  • Was elected to the House of Commons
  • There he became highly respected
  • He argued issues not based on the prevailing wind but on the relevance to the structure of society
  • He was said to have been the man that educated Commons
develop system
Develop System
  • Basic Assumptions:
    • Classical Rent
    • Population issues as presented by Malthus
    • Wage-fund
rent and corn laws
Rent and Corn Laws
  • During the Napoleonic wars (1790-1810), the English had a diffucult time using their porst
  • Thus, reduction in corn imports to England resulted in 18% annual growth rates in the price of corn
theory of value
Theory of Value
  • Use Value necessary for Exchange Value
  • Labor theory value only for Perfectly Competitive Markets
  • Economic Forces change relative prices over time
theory of value1
Theory of Value
  • Short-run price changes are due to demand-supply while Long-run price changes due to labor costs
  • Any variation of the preceding is only temporarily and in all cases Long-run price changes are due to labor cost changes
distribution theory marginal product1
Distribution TheoryMarginal Product





Doses of Capital

basic assumption of the law of comperative advantages
Basic Assumption of the Law of Comperative Advantages
  • Each Country has a fixed endowment of resources, and all units of each particular resource are identical (i.e. homogenous factors).
  • The factors of production are completely mobile between alternative uses within a country factor prices identical for alternative uses.
assumptions cont
Assumptions (Cont)
  • The factors of production are completely immobile externally (i.e. across countries) factor prices can be different across countries prior to trade
  • A labor theory of value is employed for the model. Thus the value of the product is determine solely by the value of its labor (a) no other input is being used, or (b) the other inputs are measured in terms of its labor cost, or (c) the other input/labor ratios.
assumptions cont1
Assumptions (cont.)
  • are the same in all industries.
  • The level of technology is fixed in each country during the period under consideration, although the technology can differ between them.
  • Costs of production are constant horizontal supply curve.
There is full employment.
  • There is perfect competition.
  • No government-imposed obstacles to economic activity.
  • Internal and external transportation costs are zero.
  • We begin with a two-country and two-commodity trade
comparative advantage
Comparative Advantage
  • If the Autarky Price ratio is the pre-trade price ratios.
    • These are based on the opportunity cost
    • England 1 W : 1.2 C
    • Portugal 1 W ; 8/9 C
  • Who should specialize in Wine:
  • Who should specialize in Clothing:
comparative advantage1
Comparative Advantage
  • So given the previous table:
    • The range of the TOT would be
    • 1 W : for ______ C high
    • 1 W : for ______ C low
say s law
Say’s Law
  • J.B. Say, James Mill, and David Ricardo
  • Supply Creates Its Own Demand
  • Thus, Glut in a market may exist but it will not exist in all markets
  • An argument against Malthus