Chapter 14
1 / 99

Microbial Evolution and Systematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Chapter 14. Microbial Evolution and Systematics. I. Early Earth and the Origin and Diversification of Life . 14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth 14.2 Origin of Cellular Life 14.3 Microbial Diversification: Consequences for Earth’s Biosphere 14.4 Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Microbial Evolution and Systematics' - genna

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Chapter 14

Chapter 14

Microbial Evolution and Systematics

I early earth and the origin and diversification of life
I. Early Earth and the Origin and Diversification of Life

  • 14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth

  • 14.2 Origin of Cellular Life

  • 14.3 Microbial Diversification: Consequences for Earth’s Biosphere

  • 14.4 Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes

14 1 formation and early history of earth
14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth

  • The Earth is ~ 4.5 billion years old

  • First evidence for microbial life can be found in rocks ~ 3.86 billion years old (southwestern Green land)

Ancient Microbial Life

3.45 billion-year-old rocks, South Africa

Figure 14.1

14 1 formation and early history of earth1
14.1 Formation and Early History of Earth

  • Stromatolites

    • Fossilized microbial mats consisting of layers of filamentous prokaryotes and trapped sediment

    • Found in rocks 3.5 billion years old or younger

    • Comparisons of ancient and modern stromatolites provide evidence that

      • Anoxygenic phototrophic filamentous bacteria formed ancient stromatolites (relatives of the green nonsulfur bacterium Chloroflexus)

      • Oxygenic phototrophic cyanobacteria dominate modern stromatolites

Ancient and Modern Stromatolites

3.5 billion yrs old

Oldest(Western Australia)

1.6 billion yrs old


Modern stromatolites

(Western Australia)

Modern stromatolites


Modern stromatolites

(Yellow Stone NP)

Figure 14.2

More Recent Fossil Bacteria and Eukaryotes

From 1 billion yrs old rocks in Central Australia

Figure 14.3

Eukaryotic cells

Prokaryotes (bacteria)

14 2 origin of cellular life
14.2 Origin of Cellular Life

  • Early Earth was anoxic and much hotter than present day (over 100 oC)

  • First biochemical compounds were made by abiotic systems that set the stage for the origin of life

  • Surface origin hypothesis

    • Contends that the first membrane-enclosed, self-replicating cells arose out of primordial soup rich in organic and inorganic compounds in ponds on Earth’s surface

    • Dramatic temperature fluctuations and mixing from meteor impacts, dust clouds, and storms argue against this hypothesis

  • Subsurface origin hypothesis

    • States that life originated at hydrothermal springs on ocean floor

      • Conditions would have been more stable

      • Steady and abundant supply of energy (e.g., H2 and H2S) may have been available at these sites

Submarine Mound Formed at Ocean Hydrothermal Spring

Cooler, more oxidized, more acidic ocean water

Hot, reduced, alkaline hydrothermal fluid

Figure 14.4

  • Prebiotic chemistry of early Earth set stage for self-replicating systems

  • First self-replicating systems may have been RNA-based (RNA world theory)

    • RNA can bind small molecules (e.g., ATP, other nucleotides)

    • RNA has catalytic activity; may have catalyzed its own synthesis

A Model for the Origin of Cellular Life

Last Universal Common Ancestor

Figure 14.5

  • Other important steps in emergence of cellular life repository

    • Build up of lipids

    • Synthesis of phospholipid membrane vesicles that enclosed the cell’s biochemical and replication machinery

      • May have been similar to vesicles synthesized on the surfaces of montmorillonite clay

Lipid Vesicles Made in the Laboratory from repositoryMyristic Acid



Vesicle synthesis is catalyzed by the surfaces of montmorillonite clay particles.

Figure 14.6

Major Landmarks in Biological Evolution primitive cells was exclusively

Figure 14.7

A Possible Energy-Generating Scheme for Primitive Cells primitive cells was exclusively

Figure 14.8

  • Early forms of primitive cells was exclusively chemolithotrophic metabolismwould have supported production of large amounts of organic compounds

  • Organic material provided abundant, diverse, and continually renewed source of reduced organic carbon, stimulating evolution of various chemoorganotrophic metabolisms

14 3 microbial diversification
14.3 Microbial Diversification primitive cells was exclusively

  • Molecular evidence suggests ancestors of Bacteria and Archaea diverged ~ 4 billion years ago

  • As lineages diverged, distinct metabolisms developed

  • Development of oxygenic photosynthesisdramatically changed course of evolution

  • ~ 2.7 billion years primitive cells was exclusively ago, cyanobacterial lineages developed a photosystem that could use H2O instead of H2S, generating O2

  • By 2.4 billion years ago, O2 concentrations raised to 1 part per million; initiation of the great oxidation event

  • O2 could not accumulate until it reacted with abundant reduced materials (i.e., FeS, FeS2) in the oceans

    • Banded iron formations: iron oxides (e.g. Fe2O3) in laminated sedimentary rocks; prominent feature in geological record

Banded Iron Formations primitive cells was exclusively

Iron oxides

Figure 14.9

  • Development of primitive cells was exclusively oxic atmosphere led to evolution of new metabolic pathways that yielded more energy than anaerobic metabolisms

  • Oxygen also spurred evolution of organelle-containing eukaryotic microorganisms

    • Oldest eukaryotic microfossils ~ 2 billion years old

    • Fossils of multicellular and more complex eukaryotes are found in rocks 1.9 to 1.4 billion years old

  • Consequence of O primitive cells was exclusively 2 for the evolution of life

    • Formation of ozone layer that provides a barrier against UV radiation

      • Without this ozone shield, life would only have continued beneath ocean surface and in protected terrestrial environments

14 4 endosymbiotic origin of eukaryotes
14.4 Endosymbiotic Origin of Eukaryotes primitive cells was exclusively

  • Endosymbiosis

    • Well-supported hypothesis for origin of eukaryotic cells

    • Contends that mitochondria and chloroplasts arose from symbiotic association of prokaryotes within another type of cell

  • Two hypotheses primitive cells was exclusively exist to explain the formation of the eukaryotic cell

    1) Eukaryotes began as nucleus-bearing lineage that later acquired mitochondria and chloroplasts by endosymbiosis

2) Eukaryotic cell arose from intracellular association between O2-consuming bacterium (the symbiont), which gave rise to mitochondria, and an archaean host

  • Both hypotheses suggest eukaryotic cell is between Ochimeric

  • This is supported by several features

    • Eukaryotes have similar lipids and energy metabolisms to Bacteria

    • Eukaryotes have transcription and translational machinery most similar to Archaea

Major Features Grouping between OBacteria or Archaea with Eukarya

Table 14.1

Ii microbial evolution
II. Microbial Evolution between O

  • 14.5 The Evolutionary Process

  • 14.6 Evolutionary Analysis: Theoretical Aspects

  • 14.7 Evolutionary Analysis: Analytical Methods

  • 14.8 Microbial Phylogeny

  • 14.9 Applications of SSU rRNA Phylogenetic Methods

14 5 the evolutionary process
14.5 The Evolutionary Process between O

  • Mutations

    • Changes in the nucleotide sequence of an organism’s genome

    • Occur because of errors in the fidelity of replication, UV radiation, and other factors

    • Adaptative mutations improve fitness of an organism, increasing its survival

  • Other genetic changes include gene duplication, horizontal gene transfer, and gene loss

14 6 evolutionary analysis theoretical aspects
14.6 Evolutionary Analysis: Theoretical Aspects between O

  • Phylogeny

    • Evolutionary history of a group of organisms

    • Inferred indirectly from nucleotide sequence data

  • Molecular clocks (chronometers)

    • Certain genes and proteins that are measures of evolutionary change

    • Major assumptions of this approach are that nucleotide changes occur at a constant rate, are generally neutral, and random

  • The most widely used molecular clocks are between Osmall subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes

    • Found in all domains of life

      • 16S rRNA in prokaryotes and 18S rRNA in eukaryotes

    • Functionally constant

    • Sufficiently conserved (change slowly)

    • Sufficient length

Ribosomal RNA between O

16S rRNA from E. coli

Figure 14.11

  • Carl Woese between O

    • Pioneered the use of SSU rRNA for phylogenetic studies in 1970s

    • Established the presence of three domains of life:

      • Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya

    • Provided a unified phylogenetic framework for bacteria

  • The between Oribosomal database project (RDP)

    • A large collection of rRNA sequences

      • Currently contains > 409,000 sequences

    • Provides a variety of analytical programs

14 7 evolutionary analysis analytical methods
14.7 Evolutionary Analysis: Analytical Methods between O

  • Comparative rRNA sequencing is a routine procedure that involves

    • Amplification of the gene encoding SSU rRNA

    • Sequencing of the amplified gene

    • Analysis of sequence in reference to other sequences

  • The between Ofirst step in sequence analysis involves aligning the sequence of interest with sequences from homologous (orthologous) genes from other strains or species

Alignment of DNA Sequences between O

Figure 14.13

  • BLAST between O(basic local alignment search tool)

    • Web-based tool of the National Institutes of Health

    • Aligns query sequences with those in GenBank database

    • Helpful in identifying gene sequences

  • Phylogenetic Tree between O

    • Graphic illustration of the relationships among sequences

    • Composed of nodes and branches

    • Branches define the order of descent and ancestry of the nodes

    • Branch length represents the number of changes that have occurred along that branch

  • Evolutionary analysis uses between Ocharacter-state methods (cladistics) for tree reconstruction

  • The higher the proportion of characteristics that two organisms share, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor

  • Cladistic methods

    • Define phylogenetic relationships by examining changes in nucleotides at individual positions in the sequence

    • Use those characters that are phylogenetically informative and define monophyletic groups (a group which contains all the descendants of a common ancestor; a clade)

Identification of Phylogenetically Informative Sites between O

Dots: neutral sites.

Arrows: phylogenetically informative sites, varying in at least two of the sequences.

Figure 14.15

14 8 microbial phylogeny
14.8 Microbial Phylogeny between O

  • The universal phylogenetic tree based on SSU rRNA genes is a genealogy of all life on Earth

  • Domain between OBacteria

    • Contains at least 80 major evolutionary groups (phyla)

    • Many groups defined from environmental sequences (metagenome)alone

      • i.e., no cultured representatives

    • Many groups are phenotypically diverse

      • i.e., physiology and phylogeny not necessarily linked

  • Eukaryotic organelles originated within Bacteria

    • Mitochondria arose from Proteobacteria

    • Chloroplasts arose from the cyanobacterial phylum

  • Domain between OArchaea consists of two major groups

    • Crenarchaeota

    • Euryarchaeota

  • Each of the between Othree domains of life can be characterized by various phenotypic properties

14 9 applications of ssu rrna phylogenetic methods
14.9 Applications of SSU rRNA Phylogenetic Methods between O

  • Signature Sequences

    • Short oligonucleotides unique to certain groups of organisms

    • Often used to design specific nucleic acid probes

  • Probes

    • Can be general or specific

    • Can be labeled with fluorescent tags and hybridized to rRNA in ribosomes within cells

      • FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization

    • Circumvent need to cultivate organism(s)

Fluorescently Labeled rRNA Probes: Phylogenetic Stains between O

Stained with universal rRNA probe

Stained with a eukaryotic rRNA probe

Figure 14.17

  • Ribotyping microbial community

    • Method of identifying microbes from analysis of DNA fragments generated from restriction enzyme digestion of genes encoding SSU rRNA

    • Highly specific and rapid

    • Used in bacterial identification in clinical diagnostics and microbial analyses of food, water, and beverage

Ribotyping microbial community

Figure 14.18

Iii microbial systematics
III. Microbial Systematics microbial community

  • 14.10 Phenotypic Analysis

  • 14.11 Genotypic Analysis

  • 14.12 Phylogenetic Analysis

  • 14.13 The Species Concept in Microbiology

  • 14.14 Classification and Nomenclature

14 10 phenotypic analysis
14.10 Phenotypic Analysis microbial community

  • Taxonomy

    • The science of identification, classification, and nomenclature

  • Systematics

    • The study of the diversity of organisms and their relationships

    • Links phylogeny with taxonomy

  • Bacterial taxonomy incorporates microbial communitymultiple methods for identification and description of new species

  • The polyphasic approach to taxonomy uses three methods

    1) Phenotypic analysis

    2) Genotypic analysis

    3) Phylogenetic analysis

  • Phenotypic analysis microbial communityexamines the morphological, metabolic, physiological, and chemical characters of the cell

  • Fatty Acid Analyses microbial community(FAME: fatty acid methyl ester)

    • Relies on variation in type and proportion of fatty acids present in membrane lipids for specific prokaryotic groups

    • Requires rigid standardization because FAME profiles can vary as a function of temperature, growth phase, and growth medium

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Analysis microbial community

Figure 14.19a

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Analysis microbial community

Figure 14.19b

14 11 genotypic analysis
14.11 Genotypic Analysis microbial community

  • Several methods of genotypic analysis are available and used

    • DNA-DNA hybridization

    • DNA profiling

    • Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST)

    • GC Ratio

  • DNA-DNA hybridization microbial community

    • Genomes of two organisms are hybridized to examine proportion of similarities in their gene sequences

Genomic Hybridization as a Taxonomic Tool microbial community

Figure 14.20a

Figure 14.20b microbial community

Figure 14.20c microbial community

  • DNA-DNA hybridization microbial community

    • Provides rough index of similarity between two organisms

    • Useful complement to SSU rRNA gene sequencing

    • Useful for differentiating very similar organisms

    • Hybridization values 70% or higher suggest strains belong to the same species

      • Values of at least 25% suggest same genus

Relationship Between microbial communitySSU rRNA and DNA Hybridization





  • DNA Profiling microbial community

    • Several methods can be used to generate DNA fragment patterns for analysis of genotypic similarity among strains, including

      • Ribotyping: focuses on a single gene (SSU rRNA)

      • Repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (rep-PCR): focused on highly conserved repetitive DNA elements

      • Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP):focus on many genes located randomly throughout genome

        - digestion of genomic DNA with one or two restriction

        enzymes and selective PCR of resulting fragments

DNA Fingerprinting with rep-PCR microbial community

Figure 14.22

  • Multilocus microbial communitySequence Typing (MLST)

    • Method in which several different “housekeeping genes” from an organism are sequenced (~450-bp)

    • Has sufficient resolving power to distinguish between very closely related strains

Multilocus sequence typing
Multilocus Sequence Typing microbial community

  • GC Ratios microbial community

    • Percentage of guanine plus cytosine in an organism’s genomic DNA

    • Vary between 20 and 80% among Bacteria and Archaea

    • Generally accepted that if GC ratios of two strains differ by ~ 5% they are unlikely to be closely related

14 12 phylogenetic analysis
14.12 Phylogenetic Analysis microbial community

  • 16S rRNA gene sequences are useful in taxonomy; serve as “gold standard” for the identification and description of new species

    • Proposed that a bacterium should be considered a new species if its 16S rRNA gene sequence differs by more than 3% from any named strain, and a new genus if it differs by more than 5%

  • The microbial communitylack of divergence of the 16S rRNA gene limits its effectiveness in discriminating between bacteria at the species level, thus, a multi-gene approach can be used

  • Multi-gene sequence analysis is similar to MLST, but uses complete sequences and comparisons are made using cladistic methods

  • Whole-genome sequence analyses microbial communityare becoming more common

    • Provide many traits for comparative genotypic analysis

    • Genome structure

      - size and number of chromosomes, GC ratio, linear or circular, etc.

    • Gene content

    • Gene order

14 13 the species concept in microbiology
14.13 The Species Concept in Microbiology microbial community

  • No universally accepted concept of species for prokaryotes

  • Current definition of prokaryotic species

    • Collection of strains sharing a high degree of similarity in several independent traits

      • Most important traits include 70% or greater DNA-DNA hybridization and 97% or greater 16S rRNA gene sequence identity

Taxonomic Hierarchy for microbial communityAllochromatium warmingii

  • Biological species concept microbial community: not meaningful for prokaryotes as they are haploid and do not undergo sexual reproduction

  • Genealogical species concept: an alternative

    • Prokaryotic species is a group of strains that based on DNA sequences of multiple genes cluster closely with others phylogenetically and are distinct from other groups of strains

Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Analysis microbial community

16S rRNA genes

gyrB genes

luxABFE genes

50 nucleotide changes

Figure 14.24

  • Ecotype microbial community

    • Population of cells that share a particular resource

    • Different ecotypes can coexist in a habitat

  • Bacterial speciation may occur from a combination of repeated periodic selection for a favorable trait within an ecotype and lateral gene flow

A Model for Bacterial Speciation microbial community

Figure 14.25

14 14 classification and nomenclature
14.14 Classification and Nomenclature microbial community

  • Classification

    • Organization of organisms into progressively more inclusive groups on the basis of either phenotypic similarity or evolutionary relationship

  • Prokaryotes are given descriptive genus names and species epithets following the binomial system of nomenclature used throughout biology

  • Assignment of names for species and higher groups of prokaryotes is regulated by the Bacteriological Code- The International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria

  • Formal recognition of a new prokaryotic species requires epithets following the

    • Deposition of a sample of the organism in two culture collections

    • Official publication of the new species name and description in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM)

  • The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) is responsible for overseeing nomenclature and taxonomy of Bacteria and Archaea

KCCM Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms Seoul, Korea

KACC Korean Agricultural Culture Collection Suwon, Korea

Some National Microbial Culture Collections

Table 14.6