240 likes | 251 Views
This study aims to estimate price elasticities for electricity and natural gas demand in Colorado, crucial for forecasting and policy-making in the energy sector. By utilizing an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) model, the study examines end-use impact, elasticity stability, and variable correction to provide valuable insights for utilities and government agencies.
E N D
An ADL Model for Electricity and Natural Gas Demand in ColoradoLeila Dagher, PHDAmerican University of Beirut
OUTLINE Introduction Literature Review Model Data and Methodology Results Conclusions
INTRODUCTION Primary Goal: estimate dynamic price elasticities. Secondary Goals End-use impact Price elasticity stability Correct price variable
INTRODUCTION Elasticities are used by utilities and government agencies for: • Forecasting • Policy making There is a renewed interest in elasticities as a result of • the increased concern in energy pollution • the rise in energy prices.
INTRODUCTION • Capital Intensive → Huge Savings • Elasticities are region specific • Existing estimates for Colorado are inconsistent with economic theory • Stability of estimates
Xcel Energy Service Territory Xcel Energy Service Territory
Electricity NaturalGas
LITERATURE REVIEW • Omission of standard errors especially for the LR elasticities • Wide-ranging estimates • Consumer sectors • Sample periods • Modeling variables • Level of analysis • Modeling methods and data types
DEMAND MODEL ADL
DATA AND METHODOLOGY Unit-root testing Co-integration testing Multicollinearity Data were averaged and logged Deflator CO CPI Lagged prices Frequency conversion Customers variables were smoothed using an IV
ESTIMATION ISSUES • Spurious Regression • Statistical Inference • Price Endogeneity • Inconsistent Estimates
METHODOLOGY • OLS regression and choose the ARDL model that has uncorrelated errors while optimizing the SIC. • T and F statistics on this model are valid
METHODOLOGY • Lag selection • Residual Diagnostics • Saturation/efficiency indices • Test for model and coefficient stability and price asymmetries • Monthly bill • Dynamic elasticities
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS • Data aggregation • Seasonal differencing • Different models • Lag selection • Selection criterion • Sample periods
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS Demand is highly inelastic Surcharges for DSM or RE Customers do not respond to joint bill LR range DE useful tool for end users