Kevin Hsia Lighting/Electrical Option Advisor: Dr. Richard Mistrick Ted Dannerth April 15, 2009

1. New York University Concourse Project New York, NY Kevin Hsia Lighting/Electrical Option Advisor: Dr. Richard Mistrick Ted Dannerth April 15, 2009

2. Overview Summary of Thesis • General Building Information / Location Concept Gould Plaza – Architecture Breadth, Lighting Depth, Tisch Hall Lobby – Lighting Depth Photovoltaic Feasibility Study– Electrical Depth Master Depth Study– Daylighting

3. Summary of Thesis Lighting Depth Study • Gould Plaza • Classroom • MBA Student Lounge • Tisch Hall Lobby Electrical Depth Study • Redesign 4 spaces • Backup Generator • Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Breadth Study • Architecture – Outdoor Plaza • Mechanical – Water Harvest System on Plaza Master Depth Study • Daylighting – Tisch Hall

4. Daylighting – Tisch Hall • Summary of Thesis Lighting Depth Study • Gould Plaza • Classroom • MBA Student Lounge • Tisch Hall Lobby Electrical Depth Study • Redesign 4 spaces • Backup Generator • Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Breadth Study • Architecture – Outdoor Plaza • Mechanical – Water Harvest System on Plaza Master Depth Study

5. General Building Information • Building Name: New York University Concourse Project • 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012 • Building Occupant : Education/University • Size: 70,000 sq.ft • Owner: New York University Stern School of Business • Architect: Perkins + Will • MEP Engineer: BR+A • Structural: Severud • Lighting Designer: Cline Bettridge Bernstein Lighting Design • Construction dates: Fall 07 – Fall 09 • Cost : $35 million KMC Tisch Hall Weaver Hall Gould Plaza

6. General Building Information • Building Name: New York University Concourse Project • 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012 • Building Occupant : Education/University • Size: 70,000 sq.ft • Owner: New York University Stern School of Business • Architect: Perkins + Will • MEP Engineer: BR+A • Structural: Severud • Lighting Designer: Cline Bettridge Bernstein Lighting Design • Construction dates: Fall 07 – Fall 09 • Cost : $35 million Ground Level Upper Concourse Lower Concourse

7. Concept Create Pride Strengthen Spirit of NYU Eliminate Depression Stress related to competitive nature of the business school Provide Way-finding/Orientation Congested traffic throughout the building Improve Physical Health Lack connection to nature and daylight

8. Other Concepts Sustainable Systems Integrate energy efficient systems into architecture Function Improve overall usage of building

9. Gould Plaza

10. Gould Plaza • Architecture Breadth • New Furniture System • Create relaxing atmosphere • Bring scale of the plaza down

11. Gould Plaza • Architecture Breadth • New Furniture System • Create relaxing atmosphere • Bring scale of the plaza down

12. Gould Plaza Considerations and Criteria Safety to walk Modeling points of interest: Doors & Walkways Maintain 1 fc on major walkways Create sense of pride Design Solution Address school identity by lighting a NYU logo Light perimeter of Plaza to define the boundary

13. Gould Plaza 3 2 1 10 9 1 4 6 4 7 6 8 10 9 2 7 5 3 8 5

14. Gould Plaza

15. Gould Plaza Design Solution Achieve average 1 fc on entrance and major walkways Power Density Designed 0.17 W/sq. ft Power Density Max Allowed 0.2 W/sq. ft

16. Tisch Hall Lobby Considerations and Criteria Create spacious and pleasant environment Facial recognition and safety Achieve 15 fc on floor Design Solution Using light to create a hierarchy to direct people Use of modern looking luminaires

17. Tisch Hall Lobby Considerations and Criteria Create spacious and pleasant environment Facial recognition and safety Achieve 15 fc on floor Design Solution Using light to create a hierarchy to direct people Use of modern looking luminaires

18. Tisch Hall Lobby • Tisch Hall Lobby 4 6 1 Considerations and Criteria Create spacious and pleasant environment Facial recognition and safety Achieve 15 fc on floor Design Solution Using light to create a hierarchy to direct people Use of modern looking luminaires 1 2 2 3 5 7 6 5 4 3 7

19. Tisch Hall Lobby • Tisch Hall Lobby

20. Tisch Hall Lobby • Tisch Hall Lobby Design Solution Achieve average 15 fc on lobby floor Power Density Designed 1.05 W/sq. ft Power Density Max Allowed 1.30 W/sq. ft

21. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Considerations Promote alternative ways to generate electricity Design Solution Install photovoltaic panels on Weaver, Tisch, and KMC

22. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Equinox – March 21st Considerations Promote alternative ways to generate electricity Design Solution Install photovoltaic panels on Weaver, Tisch, and KMC

23. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study PV array positions Considerations Promote alternative ways to generate electricity Design Solution Install photovoltaic panels on Weaver, Tisch, and KMC Mounting Area: 21,056 sq. ft. Total Panels: 1,392 Power Generated: 278kW

24. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Power Generated: 278kW Power Generated: 278kW Power Consumed in Tisch Hall : 840kW Power Consumed in Tisch Hall : 840kW Save: 33% of power

25. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study Grant: $2,689,585 Pay$563,623 Total Cost: $3,253,208 Grant: $2,689,585 Total Cost: $3,253,208

26. Photovoltaic Feasibility Study PV Cost Savings/Year $563,623 $38,328 Payback Period: 14.7 years

27. Master Depth Daylighting Study Study Analyze the daylighting conditions in Tisch Lobby Calculate energy savings for a photosensor based system Method Agi32 - analyze daylighting conditions in the lobby Ecotect Excel – find critical point to locate photosensor Daysim – calculate energy savings

28. Master Depth Daylighting Study Equinox – March 21st 9 AM 12 PM 3 PM 6 PM

29. Zone 1 Always on • Master Depth Daylighting Study Zone 2 (time clock) Zone 3 (photosenor)

30. Master Depth Daylighting Study

31. Conclusion • Create Pride • Eliminate Depression • Provide Way-finding/Orientation • Improve Physical Health • Sustainable Systems • Function Gould Plaza Lounge Tisch Hall Plaza Tisch Hall Plaza Plaza

32. Acknowledgement Special Thanks Perkins + Will New York University Industry Professionals Advisors Dr. Richard Mistrick Professor Ted Dannerth Professor Robert Holland Professor Kevin Parfitt Fellow AE classmates

33. Questions