1 / 17

The Conversation

The Conversation. By: Rachael Bajema and Julie Dalton. Crucial Conversations are Difficult. Crucial conversations are those that can alter your life Difficult conversation are on topics you find hard to talk about

gavin
Download Presentation

The Conversation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Conversation By: Rachael Bajema and Julie Dalton

  2. Crucial Conversations are Difficult • Crucial conversations are those that can alter your life • Difficult conversation are on topics you find hard to talk about • Since crucial conversations are often life changing, they are usually difficult

  3. Human Nature • Most people approach these conversations one of two ways: “silence or violence” (Patterson et al., 2002) • Fight or Flight • Usually these conversations are spontaneous • According to Patterson, Grenny, McMillian, and Switzer (2002), when confronted with a difficult conversation, we are genetically programmed to react • As a result, we usually end up doing things or saying things we later regret

  4. The Missteps • Assumptions and Intentions • Offending and Defending • Playing the Blame Game

  5. Assumptions and Intentions

  6. Assumptions and Intentions • It is easy to couple impact (on us) with intent (of the person). • Since crucial conversations are often spontaneous, it is easy to jump to conclusions about intent • Stone, Patton, and Heen (1999) point out that “intentions are invisible” and we can only assume them from the other person’s behavior. • As a result, if the other person’s behavior hurts us, we are more likely to assume that person had bad intentions

  7. Offending and Defending

  8. Offending and Defending • We often go in to crucial conversations with the “right or wrong” attitude • We defend our position to the end and see the other person as our opponent • Which in turn makes “our opponent” defend their position • No resolution

  9. Playing the Blame Game

  10. Playing the Blame Game • Pattern of a Crucial/Difficult Conversation • We feel hurt/scared/offended • We assume we know intent • We defend • We blame

  11. What to DO?? • Patterson et al. (2002) sugests: Start with the Heart • You will never get anywhere if you don’t genuinely want to resolve the situation • Motive is everything

  12. What to DO?? • Assumptions and Intentions • Seek first to understand • To get anywhere in a disagreement, we need to understand the other person’s story well enough so that their conclusions make sense within it (Stone et al., 1999). • We assume that we know the other person’s intentions when we don’t—it is impossible • “Disentangle Impact from Intent” (Stone et al., 1999)

  13. What to DO?? • Assumptions and Intentions, continued • Our assumptions affects our behavior towards the other person, which in turn affects their behavior toward us • It is important to acknowledge the other person’s feelings • Once we let go of our assumptions, we are free to understand differing perceptions, interpretations and values

  14. What to DO?? • Offending and Defending • When it comes to crucial conversations, the reality is that almost always both people contributed to the situation • “Move from Certainty to Curiosity” (Stone et al., 1999) • Instead of an “I’m right, you’re wrong” stance, move to an “And” stance • “and” allows us to embrace both sides of the story and come to a mutual conclusion

  15. What to DO?? • Offending and Defending, continued • Commit to a mutual purpose • This means committing to the conversation until a mutual agreement can be made, not just arguing until someone finally gives in • Rather then vehemently defending your side, commit to letting go and finding common ground

  16. What to DO?? • Blame • Talking about blame distracts from the more important issue of discovering what went wrong and how we can fix it • Rather than judging (which is essentially what blame is), see how both parties contributed to the situation • “Hold your view as a Hypothesis” (Stone et al., 1999) • You only have the story from your perspective—there is always more than one piece the puzzle

More Related