Download
alabama s nutrient criteria development n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development

Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development

162 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Alabama’s Nutrient Criteria Development 2012 Annual Meeting of the SWPBA November 16, 2012

  2. Overview • Goals of Nutrient Program • Alabama Implementation Schedule and Timelines • Tallapoosa River Basin Numeric Nutrient Criteria Study • Weeks Bay Numeric Nutrient Criteria Study • Gulf of Mexico Alliance Update

  3. Goals of Nutrient Program • ADEM’s goals are consistent with the Clean Water Act and EPA’s National Nutrient Strategy • Develop and adopt nutrient criteria that support the beneficial uses designated for each waterbody and that protect these waters from potential adverse effects associated with nutrient over-enrichment • Restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of each waterbody • Maintain the diversity and uniqueness of Alabama’s waterbodies • Department’s rationale: establish nutrient criteria consistent with the “fishable/swimmable” goal of the Clean Water Act

  4. Nutrient Criteria Implementation Schedule for the Waters of Alabama

  5. Nutrient Criteria Implementation Schedule for Lakes and Reservoirs

  6. Tallapoosa River Basin NNC Study Stream, river and lake embayment sample sites

  7. Tallapoosa River Basin NNC Study • Goal: Develop numerical nutrient criteria (P & N) for wadeable streams • Data collected by ADEM and GSA; Study by AU Water Resources Center • Data collected at 34 sites during 2010 growing season • Data statistically analyzed using CART analysis • CART results • TP was nutrient driving changes in response variables for both reservoir embayment and streams/rivers • Increased TP observed with decreased photic and Secchi depths, increased Chl a, decreased fish species and Index of Biotic Integrity • Conclusion: More data will need to be collected and analyzed over several years to better define actual causal relationships. Limit stream order and focus on sampling small streams to more clearly define nutrient/biota interactions.

  8. Tallapoosa River Basin NNC Study

  9. Tallapoosa River Basin NNC Study

  10. Tallapoosa River Basin NNC Study

  11. Weeks Bay NNC Study Sampling sites used for the Weeks Bay SFTE nutrient criteria pilot study

  12. Weeks Bay NNC Study • Goal: Develop appropriate and protective nutrient criteria for estuaries. • Study by TetraTech • Data collected at 13 stations in 2011; Weeks Bay, Bon Secour Bay, Fish River, Magnolia River, Cowpen Branch, and Polecat Creek • Regression analyses reveal nitrogen and phosphorus associated with spectrophotometric Chl a concentration in the bay; TN is better predictor than TP • Recommendations • Daily minimum DO: not to be <5 mg/L, 50% of time during summer when daily mean temperature is above 20°C • 25 µg/L fluorometric Chl a (EPA and NERRS long-term monitoring) recommended to control mag and freq of hypoxia stress on aquatic life • Spectrophotometric Chl a (ADEM) annual geometric mean Chl a <6.4 µg/L and Summer geometric mean Chl a <9.1 µg/L • Recommended NC: TP <0.09 mg/L & TN <1.5 mg/L • Determined by multiple regression model when mean relationship between TN and TP is assumed and Chl a criterion = 9 µg/L • Values should be updated following subsequent data collections in Weeks Bay system and analyses relating them to those of other G of M estuaries.

  13. Weeks Bay NNC Study • Conclusion: further studies necessary to explore true causal relationship between nutrient input from upstream sources, resulting algal blooms within Weeks Bay; thus enhancing scientific defensibility of NC.

  14. Gulf of Mexico Alliance • GOMA Conference held June 19-21, 2012 in Corpus Christi, TX • Ongoing nutrient studies (NSFTE): St. Louis Bay, MS; Weeks Bay, AL; Galveston Bay, TX; Mission-Aransas Bay, TX • Continuing to identify environmental or biological indicators that are sensitive to nutrients • Ongoing communication among Gulf states on nutrient criteria development efforts • Establish technical workgroup to evaluate appropriate biological assessment tools, endpoints, and thresholds based on NSFTE studies and other available information • Develop Gulf-wide classification system for use in criteria development • Current and upcoming research projects to study hypoxia, reduce hypoxia, and efforts to improve access to hypoxia data

  15. Questions? Lynn Sisk Chief of Water Quality Branch (334) 271-7826 ls@adem.state.al.us Jennifer Haslbauer Water Quality Branch (334) 274-4250 jhaslbauer@adem.state.al.us Daniel Saliba Water Quality Branch (334) 271-7843 djsaliba@adem.state.al.us