5th SARMAF Seminar
Download
1 / 36

5th SARMAF Seminar Non Proprietary (Open Source) VS Proprietary Software - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 224 Views
  • Uploaded on

5th SARMAF Seminar Non Proprietary (Open Source) VS Proprietary Software. Agenda. Table of Contents. What’s Driving the Change Open Source & Proprietary Software Closing. Objectives. Provide a glimpse of drivers of change causing the new landscape from my experience

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '5th SARMAF Seminar Non Proprietary (Open Source) VS Proprietary Software' - faye


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
5th sarmaf seminar non proprietary open source vs proprietary software

5th SARMAF Seminar

Non Proprietary (Open Source) VS Proprietary Software


Table of contents

Agenda

Table of Contents

What’s Driving the Change

Open Source & Proprietary Software

Closing


Objectives
Objectives

  • Provide a glimpse of drivers of change causing the new landscape from my experience

    • Technological and content drivers

    • Cultural, ethical and legislative factors

    • Economical drivers – Cost effective solution


Origin of recorded information theory of evolution
Origin of Recorded Information – Theory of Evolution

Paper

Digital

Tablets

WWW

Special Libraries Association

XML

HTML

pdf

Docbase


The current situation
The Current Situation

  • Technological and Content Explosion

    • 700 – 2,400 terabytes – annual worldwide production of new information

    • Each terabyte is equivalent of a million ordinary books

    • One-fifth of the information can be found in books, newspapers, periodicals, etc.

    • The rest – OFFICE DOCUMENTS!

    • 200% - growth rate of unstructured information

    • 44 – 100 billion – growth rate of storage market, driven by data, video, and e-business


Enterprise content management
Enterprise Content Management

  • Only 20% of corporate data is structured

  • The average knowledge worker spend 40% of time looking for info

  • Up to 70% of content is recreated rather than re-used

  • Turn unstructured data into a information asset.

Marketing materials

Manuals

Meeting minutes

Structured Data

(ERP)

20%

Emails & Attachments

Contracts

Forms

PDFs

Images

Paper

Rich Media

Documents

Unstructured Data

(ECM)

80%

Web Pages

Product Data

Audio & Video

Spreadsheets

Policies / Procedures

Instant Messages



Arthur andersen s houston branch office
Arthur Andersen’s Houston Branch Office

“…perhaps nothing can bring a company down with such amazing speed as misconduct.”

M. Ingerbretsen, Why Companies Fail: The 10 Big Reasons Businesses Crumble, and How to Keep Yours Strong and Solid. (2003)


Post enron legislative factors sarbanes oxley act of 2002
Post-Enron Legislative Factors - Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Criminalizes records management practices misconduct

  • Increases sanctions for improper document management

    - falsifying - altering

    - concealing - destroying

  • Maximum sentence of 20 years

  • Applies to documents regarding all matters under

    U.S. government jurisdiction


Post 9 11 legislative factors usa patriot act
Post 9/11 Legislative Factors – USA Patriot Act

Enhances Counter-terrorism efforts

  • Allows use of surveillance methods against crimes of

  • terror

    • Permits “roving wiretap” to a particular suspect,

    • rather than a particular device

    • Conduct investigation without tipping of terrorists

    • Obtain business records in national security cases

  • Facilitates information sharing and cooperation among

    government agencies

  • Updated the law to reflect new technologies and threats

  • Increased penalties for those who commit terrorist

  • crimes.


Paradigm shift as society is changing records management is fundamentally the same
Paradigm Shift…as society is changing, records management is fundamentally the same.

  • A Records Management program still has the same fundamental building blocks:

  • Policy

  • Retention Schedules

  • Vital Records Program

  • Disaster Recovery Program

  • Training/Education Program

  • Awareness that the Records Management profession is a mix of risk-management function as well as an information management profession.

  • New industry terms being coined:

    • Assured Records Management

    • Information Lifecycle Management

    • Strategic Information Management


5th sarmaf seminar non proprietary open source vs proprietary software
A Necessary Cultural and Paradigm Shifts - Collaboration and Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders…

Business Areas Core Enablers

  • Corporate Governance and Policy

  • Program Implementation

  • Compliance and Risk Management

  • Awareness and Training

  • Standardization

  • Legal

  • Audit

  • Software Development

Corporate

Security/Risk

Management

Legal and

Compliance

Records Management Program

Information

Technology

Knowledge Management


Capability skills direction
Capability/Skills Direction Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Average

Staff Size*

Capability/Skills

Direction**

2-15

  • Strategic Records Management Services

    • enterprise wide policy, retention schedules and governance

2-11

  • Advisory Services

    • Information Classification (taxonomy/metadata)

    • RM functionality, system upgrades and data migration

2-20

  • Operations - Compliance

    • Program audit

    • Disposal management

12.5-30

  • Operations - Administrative

    • Lab notebook management, scanning/indexing, retrieval

    • Paper archive and public release

    • IT support for RM software

* External Peer Benchmark Study

** My opinion


Four records management program principles
Four Records Management Program Principles Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Policy

Governance

  • All records are company assets

  • Actionable corporate policies with clear divisional implementation directives and SOP’s

  • All divisions will review records at least annually according to approved retention schedules

  • Implement an audit process to ensure alignment with the program

  • Structure that will support effective integration across the enterprise while allowing flexibility to meet unique divisional and country/region specific needs

  • Policies and processes must ensure accountability within the operating divisions

  • A comprehensive education, review, and audit process implemented at multiple levels

  • A process for capturing lessons learned and best practices

Information Technology

  • All new or modified systems will incorporate RM requirements and functionality

  • Policies must include a section for data classification and access control, allowing for flexibility to change security levels over time

  • Each division will remain the owner of the data in any system

Standards

  • All divisions will adopt archiving practices consistent with program requirements

  • All divisions will participate in the development and consistent implementation of data, metadata, and other similar standards for identifying, storing, and managing information


Elements and skills needed in the new landscape
Elements and Skills Needed in the New Landscape Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Consulting skills to serve other corporate professionals as recognized and respected experts

  • Better understanding of the business in which the company is involved.

  • Conduct program audits with a constructive and helpful attitude, not an accusatory one.

  • Participate and engage “communities of practice” in solving problems.

  • Develop more relevant and responsive services oriented to need of the company.

  • Developing criteria for measuring information quality.

  • Understanding of systems and technologies.

  • Understanding of human behavior on how records are created and share information


Technology
Technology Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Platforms managing digital assets are available

  • Proprietary (OpenText, IBM, EMC, etc)

  • FOSS (Alfresco, etc)


What is proprietary software
What is Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholdersproprietary software?

  • Proprietary software

    • Developed by closed group/ company

    • Sold to clients – per user license

    • May not distribute, copy or modify

    • No access to source code

    • 15 – 20% maintenance fee to access patches, support


What is open source software
What is Open Source Software Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • So what is it?

    • Developed by group of geographically distributed developers, mostly for no pay

    • Usually free of licensing cost

    • Can be copied, modified, redistributed, incorporated in other OSS apps freely


What is open source software1
What is Open Source Software Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Is it free?

    • Of licensing costs? Mostly, yes, but it needn’t be

    • Some vendors charge for distributing it (like Redhat Linux)

    • Support, training, documentation usually come at a price


What is open source software2
What is Open Source Software Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Is it Linux? Is it Ubuntu?

    • Linux is one of many 10’s of 1000’s OSS apps

    • On sourceforge.net, there are 65,000 apps

  • Is OSS competing with Microsoft

    • Yes, but not as its reason for existence

    • Some OSS apps compete in the same space as MS – Openoffice, Linux, Apache HTTP Server, J2EE app servers etc


Why are organisations using oss
Why are organisations using OSS Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Cost

    • TCO of OSS often lower than proprietary

    • Use of open standards allows broader interoperability

    • Stability & security of OSS often greater than proprietary software

    • No vendor lock-in – can swap out OSS with greater ease

    • Platform independence

    • Access to source

    • Ability to support internally


Which governments are using oss
Which governments are using OSS? Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Some 170 governments (local and national), including 20 of the United States have formal OSS policies

  • South Africa has formalised its OSS position (www.oss.gov.za)


What is sa doing
What is SA doing? Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Adopting a policy in which:

    • Discrimination & prejudice will be avoided. Choices made based on merit

    • OSS & proprietary software given equal opportunity

    • OSS preferable where the direct advantages & disadvantages of OSS & PS are equally strong, & where circumstances

    • Open standards will be a prerequisite for all software development


What is sa doing1
What is SA doing? Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Adopting a policy in which:

    • Government will encourage partnerships within the wider public sector, the private sector, civil society, the rest of Africa & globally to foster the utilisation of OSS

    • SITA will provide leadership & support for Government institutions

    • OSS model will be adopted for development of Government systems & such systems will be developed to run on OSS platforms.


What is sa doing2
What is SA doing? Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Gov is already largest user of OSS in SA

  • Northern Cape largest provincial user of OSS

  • Western Cape utilising OSS widely

  • Various gov departments evaluating or using OSS


What is sa doing3
What is SA doing? Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Recent launch of Impi Linux – SA own Linux distribution based on Debian & distributed in multiple languages

  • Project Meraka – CSIR open source resource centre – support of Dept Science & Tech & Shuttleworth foundation

  • HP chooses open-source software for its Mogalakwena I-Community in the Limpopo province


Open source in the ecm space
Open Source in the ECM space Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Taken serious now by Gartner and other analyst

  • Part of the evolution of FOSS to the Business Application layer

  • Already successfully implemented in some large enterprises ie Adobe etc.


Open source vs proprietary
Open source vs proprietary Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

All software acquisition is risky. Always consider:

  • Acquisition cost - initial and ongoing

  • Training costs - how much re-training is needed?

  • Support costs - in-house or third party?

  • Interoperability - what else does it need to work with?

  • Reliability and security - look at track record

    …regardless of whether it is open source or proprietary.

    Competing solutions should be evaluated on the same criteria.


Open source pros
Open source pros Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • A ready made community

  • Community driven = community serving

  • No licence costs

  • No vendor lock in

  • Infinitely customizable

  • Investment is typically in training staff rather than a third party - staff development!


Open source cons
Open source cons Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Fear of no-one to blame

  • No vendor guarantees

  • Project folding is more common than vendor folding

  • Open source may be incompatible with other deployed software

  • Proprietary software is often more feature rich

  • Documentation quality is variable


Be careful
Be careful .... Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Do Interface Standards Compress Pricing?

􀂃 Hyundai & Lamborghini both support same “interface standard” for layout of driver

controls (steering wheel, gas, brake, clutch, gearshift, turn signal, speedometer, tach)

􀂃 Hyundai has far greater financial muscle and low cost producer status versus

Lamborghini.

􀂃 “Interface standard” is not “implementation standard” (horsepower, body styling,

sound system, seat fabric, …)

2006 Lamborghini Murcielago. $279,000 1988 Hyundai Excel, $975

2006 Lamborghini Murcielago. $279,000

1988 Hyundai Excel, $975


Ecm applications available in the market
ECM applications available in the Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholdersmarket

Proprietary software

Open Text

 (Hummingbird and Livelink were

merged recently, Hummingbird

Enterprise™ Rebranded to

Livelink ECM – eDOCS™)

IBM Content Manager

 (IBM has acquired Filenet, but do not know about their plans wrt the two products)

Documentum

Microsoft (Share point)

Vignette

PaperTrail

Trim

Collaborator

More….

OSS

Alfresco

 Categories: CMS ECM

 Technologies: Java JDBC MySQL Tomcat

 Licenses: GPL

Knowledge Tree

 Categories: ECM

 Technologies: Java

 Licenses: Eclipse Public Licenses: LGPL

Nuxeo

 Categories: CMS ECM

 Technologies: Apache HTTP Server MySQL

PHP

 Licenses: GPL3

Brazilian development tool

More ….


Key challenges in oss
Key Challenges in OSS Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Maturity of OSS ECM in RSA and Skills availability

 National

 Internally

 Vendors (Local)

 Change management

 Departmental (ECM is not IT responsibility but a business imperative and supported by IT)

 Current vendors (Fear factor)

 Vendor Support post implementation

SITA Capacity and logistics


5th sarmaf seminar non proprietary open source vs proprietary software

Experience Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

Strategic Partner

the dme

Department of Transport Western Cape

Department of Environment and Tourism

Department of Health Western Cape

Department of Minerals and Energy


Closing
Closing Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

  • Great opportunity for people in information management profession and in particular records management to:

    • advance the most senior levels

    • Make a positive difference in their organization in the way information, records and knowledge is managed.

    • Go from Records and Information Management professional to a Strategic Information Management professional

      … the platform is there.


5th sarmaf seminar non proprietary open source vs proprietary software

Thank You Partnerships with Core Enablers and Key Stakeholders

DankieSiyabongaKe a lebohaSiyathokoza

Rudie Bronkhorst

E-mail: rbronkhorst@datacentrix.co.za

Tel: +27 (11) 461 2081

Web: www.datacentrix.co.za