1 / 16

Review of the status of waste management at municipal level in FBiH

Review of the status of waste management at municipal level in FBiH. Waste is everything that we do not need any longer and what the owner intend to dispose Daily production of waste – difference in economic power to buy and in geographic position

fausto
Download Presentation

Review of the status of waste management at municipal level in FBiH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Review of the status of waste managementatmunicipal levelin FBiH

  2. Waste is everything that we do not need any longer and what the owner intend to dispose • Daily production of waste – difference in economic power to buy and in geographic position • InBiH in average we create 1.08kgof waste per day (per capita) • Annualy between 211 kg per capita HNK/Ž up to 386 kg per capita in Canton Sarajevo (KS) • In2010 was disposed 1.422.513 tons of waste • Daily production per cantons is estimated to be (TZ; KS) between 500 and 800 tons

  3. Legal frame – development from 2000 (EU Phare strategy) 2002/2003 Law – by 2012 bylaws were not completed (deadline 6 months up to two years) • Reversed/upside-down pyramid of waste management (EU principles) • Collecting and disposal • 40% of collected waste to non-sanitary landfills • 36% not collected at all • Wild dumps (about 2000 – 1 million m2) • Collecting rate and responsibility for enforcing of the law • Lack of finances of local utility companies

  4. Concept of regional landfills • Grude, Bihać, Tuzla – Not in my backyard (NIMBY) Money spent, still no solution on selection of the location • Sarajevo, Zenica - constructed regional landfills – partially solved Mostar, Tešanj and Krupa • Zenica – problem of insufficient quantities of waste which are transported to the landfills (Visoko, Olovo) (more than 800 wild dumps) • Problem from cantonal organization to the prices • Initiative for incineration plant Visoko (stopped by Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism)

  5. Mistakes of the past: • Unfortunate selection of municipal locations – Konjic, Jablanica, Kreševo • Unfortunate fee collection system (Gornji Vakuf – Uskoplje, Fojnica) • Lack of political agreements – landfill Krupac • Lack of law-enforcing system

  6. Waste Management in CS • Deposition of waste by 1998 in an outdated/old-fasioned way • From 1998. sanation of landfill Smiljevići • Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment Protection and KJKP “RAD” (CPUC) • 5 mil. US$ • First modern sanitary landfill • Surface 65 ha • 1 kg of waste per capita per day • (Increase in recent years)

  7. Waste Management in CS • Waste layer 50 cm high, and then the intertlayer10 cm high • The base is of compacted clay and protective PEHD foil. • First of 16 planned regional landfills. • System for gas removal • 100 drills • Plant for production of electrical energy with present capacity of 240 kW/h. • Percolation water from the landfill and treatment/cleaning device • Meteorological devices for monitoring

  8. Waste Management in CS • Separate waste collection: • Since 2004 • Pilot project started in settlement Lužani and St. Skendera Kulenovića • 2005 – insisting of Ekotim –Mojmilo • 2006 – CARDS project fin. EU 300 new station • Sorting plant for waste • Special vehicle

  9. Waste Management inCS Activities in sorting plant

  10. Waste Management in CS • Sorting plant works occassionally • Problem of waste disposal (no foils) • Mistake: one owner of everything • Plenty directors few results • Dispute City - Canton

  11. New positive examples: • Tešanj • Jablanica • Čapljina • (Recycling yards installed through the project of association LINK) • Plan for construction of WMC/CZUO in Konjic

  12. Close to the solution • Rulebook on packaging waste • Improvement of work of utility companies, new working places, new incentives for work • Low goals (better to have low goals, and do more, than to have too high and fail to realize it)

  13. translation of previous slide

  14. Thank you for your attention!Questions?

More Related