90 likes | 201 Views
Dr. Pratima Singh, a Strategic Clinical Leadership Fellow, has led the PbR initiative at Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust. This project focuses on understanding variations in care clusters and developing evidence-based care packages. By engaging with regional partners and auditing current care practices, Dr. Singh aims to improve the quality of mental health services. Key findings highlight inconsistencies in clinical data and referral processes, emphasizing the need for a unified approach using NICE guidelines as a framework for effective care delivery.
E N D
PbR : Ideas from local implementataion Dr Pratima Singh Strategic Clinical Leadership fellow NHSL& Oxleas FT
Background • Clinical lead for PbR in Oxleas NHSFT • London Fellow in Strategic clinical leadership NHSL • Deputy to Dr Strathdee, AMD NHSL and London SHA lead • National input • Regional • Local • Joint working with Devon , Avon, Solent healthcare, CNWL
PbR projects undertaken • MHCT trainer and PbR Lead for Care Package Development • Audit of Current care PbR clusters (n=126)* Poster • Deep dive into understanding variation in lower clusters 1-3 (n=600+) and 11-17 ( n=1000+) • Evidence based care package development for 1-21 based on above with clinical group*
CLUSTER xyz CARE PACKAGE ELEMENTS IN OXLEAS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Core Elements of Care: QUALITY AND OUTCOMES GOALS ENTRY TO OXLEAS SERVICES Common referral sources: Assessment: Cluster Description: CRISIS MANAGEMENT CARE COORDINATION MONITORING OF PHYSICAL AND MENTALHEALTH Diagnoses: Risk : Course: Expected Needs Indicative episode of care: Cluster reviews at least every: Step up criteria: Step down: Case Contingent Elements of Care: DISCHARGE CRITERIA (eg) Collaborative Working with agencies to meet
Key findings • Variation of patient profiles wide within each cluster ? • Variation between cluster allocation by clinician and MHCT booklet Clusters 1-3: Upto 57% ,Clusters 11-17: Upto 55% * Importance of getting this first basic step right. • Overlaps and exclusions • Inconsistency of recording clinical information and lack of feedback of information to clinicians • Gaps between actual and proposed care packages- very wide even between clinicians, teams, boroughs
Way Forward • Quality of cluster allocation and Link with a care package • Use existing NICE core interventions as frame work of Care packages that can be audited • Developing common language of beds, interventions to understand care packages • Link MH MDS data to outcomes I- ICD10, accommodation, crisis/acute/rehab/HTT beds • Commission a 1in 10 audit sample to check Cluster appropriation and Care Packages that follow* tool