1 / 17

POSC 3315

POSC 3315. W12.1. Studying Latin American politics. Context Who’s in, who’s out. Should we include the excluded? Why don’t we? Is LA a region? Historically? Economically? Politically? Culturally?. Why does this matter? What does it let us do? Why Latin America is western.

etenia
Download Presentation

POSC 3315

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POSC 3315 W12.1

  2. Studying Latin American politics • Context • Who’s in, who’s out

  3. Should we include the excluded? • Why don’t we? • Is LA a region? • Historically? • Economically? • Politically? • Culturally?

  4. Why does this matter? • What does it let us do? • Why Latin America is western. • Who says it isn’t? • Why say it is?

  5. Latin America and the Third World • What is the TW? • What are its common features? • What are its points of divergence? • How useful is the concept?

  6. How to study LA • Two approaches; not antithetical • Comparative Politics • Systematic • Problem-driven or theory-driven • Tries to transcend borders • Aims to build theory – midrange or grand • Deductive + inductive

  7. Area studies • Define by geography, cultural similarity, historical ties • Thick description • Inductive + deductive • Limited generalization • Detailed knowledge of culture, language, history

  8. Why together? • Need to think of logic of comparison and basic comparative politics research approaches. • Some need lots of detail; e.g., case studies, binary studies and small-N studies • Others, large-N studies, do not • But let us look at region-wide (20 country) questions.

  9. Most comparative politics =single case, binary ,or small-N studies • Single case • How can this be comparative? Why do this? • Binary studies: two cases • Most Similar Systems (MSS) • Least Similar/Most Dissimilar Systems (LSS/MDS)

  10. What’s the difference? • MSS: similar on most points; diverge on one • May not be able specify cause of difference’ may be multiple and interacting • Work well with within-case comparisons • MDS: similar on one; diverge on most • How do different systems  same/similar result? • Multiple, interacting causes here too • Either can be binary or small-N

  11. In case studies, binary comparisons and small-N studies • Select cases very carefully • Case study: a case of what? What principle is examined? • Binary and small-n: look for hard cases, ones that look unlikely to prove your point. • Large-N: above are qualitative, these are qualitative

  12. Large N works for some things, e.g., correlates of democracy, but not others, e.g., policies for rapid economic development • In Latin American area studies a large-N study might cover all 20 states • Case studies, binary and small-N studies well adapted to focusing on a specific area • Large-N studies let us take in all/most/many of the countries

More Related