1 / 10

Checks & Balances

Checks & Balances. Pleasantville High School US History 11R Mr. Brunelli. The Basics. Checks & Balances. DEMOCRACIES = COMMON “ INTERNAL” CHECKS (FEDERALIST 51) CHECKS AND BALANCES THROUGH THE SEPARATION OF POWERS = RARE “ EXTERNAL ” CHECKS (FEDERALIST 10)

ellery
Download Presentation

Checks & Balances

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Checks & Balances Pleasantville High School US History 11R Mr. Brunelli

  2. The Basics

  3. Checks & Balances DEMOCRACIES = COMMON “INTERNAL” CHECKS (FEDERALIST 51) CHECKS AND BALANCES THROUGH THE SEPARATION OF POWERS = RARE “EXTERNAL” CHECKS (FEDERALIST 10) (ELECTIONS & INTEREST GROUPS = COMMON

  4. Checks & Balances MOST FUSE EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE IN A PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM IN FACT – OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES – INSTABILITY, COUP D’ETATS, & BAD GOVERNMENT CHARACTERIZE PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACIES

  5. Greeks & Government PHILOSOPHER-KINGS INTELLIGENCE “BRAIN” JUDICIARY ARISTOTLE PLATO’S REPUBLIC “DIVISION OF LABOR” MONARCHY -- TYRANNY “RULE BY ONE” ARISTOCRACY -- OLIGARACHY “RULE BY THE FEW” MONTESQUIEU’S SEPARATION OF POWERS GUARDIANS COURAGE “HEART” EXECUTIVE COMMONERS DESIRE “STOMACH” LEGISLATIVE DEMOCRACY -- MOB RULE “RULE BY THE MANY”

  6. Democratic Dilemmas • BEFORE CONSTITUTION . . . • FEW DEMOCRACIES = SMALL OR UNSUCCESSFUL • ATHENS – CITY-STATE, LOST TO AUTOCRATIC SPARTA • ROMAN REPUBLIC – BECAME AN EMPIRE AS IT GREW • VENICE – CITY-STATE, FELL 1796 (AUSTRIA, TURKS) • GENEVA – CITY-STATE, FELL 1798 (FRANCE) • POLAND – INDECISIVE LEADERSHIP  WEAKLY DEFENDED -- PARTITIONED 1772, 1793, 1795) • IROQUOIS CONFEDERACY – MILITARISTIC: “BEAVER WARS” AGAINST FRANCE, SHAWNEE, & ALGONQUIN • CEASED TO EXIST OR CEASED TO BE DEMOCRATIC • LARGE DEMOCRACIES = NO ACCOUNTABILITY • SMALL DEMOCRACIES = TOO VULNERABLE

  7. Tyrannies • REVOLUTION = AGAINST EXECUTIVE – KINGS & ROYAL GOVERNORS – • “TYRANNY OF THE MINORITY” •  MOST STATES = STRONG LEGISLATURES & WEAK EXECUTIVES & COURTS • MADISON WORRIED ABOUT THE “TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY” • DEMAGOGUERY = EASIER IN A SMALL STATE THAN IN AN “EXTENDED REPUBLIC” • Ex. RHODE ISLAND  DORR’S REBELLION (1841) • Ex. NY, PA & MA  PARTY POLITICS (HAMILTON-BURR)

  8. MR. MADISON’S SOLUTION MADISON ARGUED “EXTENDED” REPUBLICS WOULD STOP TYRANNIES OF THE MAJORITY (FACTION) AND MINORITY (LOSS OF LIBERTY) EXTENDED REPUBLIC = MORE GROUPS & INTERESTS  NO STABLE MAJORITY • ARROW’S “IMPOSSIBILITY” THEOREM • CONDORCET PARADOX SINCE “NO ONE SHOULD BE A JUDGE IN THEIR OWN CAUSE,” GROUPS WOULD BE FORCED TO COMPROMISE • BICAMERAL LEGISLATURE – SENATE & HOUSE • TWO-STEP RATIFICATION – CONGRESS & STATES/PEOPLE • CYCLING MAJORITIES – NO STABLE MAJORITY NATIONAL GOV’T = NOT ONLY THE STRONGEST, BUT ALSO THE MOST DEMOCRATIC

  9. MADISONIAN MISTAKES • RISE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: • MARBURY V. MADISON – BY “WINNING” THIS CASE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT, MADISON ALLOWS JOHN MARSHALL TO CREATE JUDICIAL REVIEW • STRENGTHENED JUDICIAL BRANCH • RISE OF POLITICAL PARTIES: • TWO PARTY POLITICS  NO CYCLING MAJORITIES • PENDULUM vs. CYCLE DYNAMIC – RED v. BLUE STATES • SAME AS BALANCE OF POWER v. ALLIANCES IN WWI 7 COUNTRIES, B.O.P. = 840 (7*6*5*4) CHANCES 7 COUNTRIES, 2 ALLIANCES = 2 CHANCES • MADISON = 1ST PARTY “CHAIRMAN” FOR JEFFERSON • RISE OF THE “IMPERIAL” PRESIDENCY: • SIZE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH INCREASED  WEAKENED LEGISLATIVE BRANCH • LOUISIANA PURCHASE + WAR OF 1812

  10. WHY AMERICAN DEMOCRACY WORKS • STRONG JUDICIARY • THE EXTRA-CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IS A MAJOR COUNTERWEIGHT • MOST PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACIES NEVER DEVELOPED STRONG JUDICIARIES (EX. LATIN AMERICA) • DIVERSITY & EQUALITY • DIVERSITY OF GROUPS AND INTERESTS STRENGTHENS THE EXTERNAL CHECKS ON GOVERNMENT • HISTORICALLY, INEQUALITY HAS BEEN LOW & OPPORTUNITY HIGH • THE ADVANTAGE OF APATHY • LOW VOTER TURNOUT MITIGATES THE “WINNER TAKE ALL” SYSTEM • BUSH v. GORE (2000) OR COUP D’ETAT

More Related