section 2a l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Section 2a PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Section 2a

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 38

Section 2a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 1259 Views
  • Uploaded on

Section 2a The Use of Audit Sampling Test of Balances Statistical Tests of Balances Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS) or (PPS) Involves the same previously seen 14 steps

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Section 2a' - Faraday


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
section 2a

Section 2a

The Use of Audit Sampling

Test of Balances

statistical tests of balances
Statistical Tests of Balances
  • Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS) or (PPS)
  • Involves the same previously seen 14 steps
slide3

An auditor has been assigned the responsibility of auditing the trade accounts receivable of Athens Corporation as of December 31, 200X. The total amounts to $2,400,000 and consists of 800 accounts. The auditor tested controls that relate to the existence of Athens Corporation’s trade accounts receivable during November 200X. After reviewing the work, the audit manager agreed with the auditor’s assessment that assessing control risk at 80 percent was appropriate. The manager indicated that the planned audit risk should be limited to 5 percent, inherent risk should be assessed to be 100 percent, and the risk that analytical procedures will not detect material misstatements should be assessed to be 60 percent. The manager also decided that $100,000 should be used as tolerable misstatement for purposes of confirming trade accounts receivable. During last year’s audit, the auditors found misstatements amounting to only $10,000, which the manager suggests should be used this year as an estimate of the misstatement for the purposes of determining sample size. A review of the listing of accounts indicates that it includes no accounts that have credit balances or zero balances.

Athens Corporation Case

slide4

Must relate to the audit procedure

  • What would be the assertion in this example?

1. Determine the Objective of MUS Sampling

slide5
Decide if audit sampling applies
    • Why would sampling apply here?
  • 3. Define attributes and error conditions
    • What is the attribute here?
    • Error condition?
slide6
4. Define the population
  • What is the population in this case?
  • 5. Define the sampling unit
  • The sampling unit is ?
  • Logical sampling unit
slide7

Summary:

For Athens Corporation, the population is all 800 customer accounts with debit balances, and the recorded book value of the accounts is $2,400,000. The audit manager decided that customers' accounts rather than individual invoices are to be confirmed. Accounts receivable has 2,400,000 sampling units and 800 logical sampling units.

  • Specify Tolerable Misstatement (TM)
    • The auditor’s planned level of materiality for the account
    • Thus TM is
slide8

DR

7. Specify the reliability factor (RF) for acceptable risk of incorrect acceptance (ARIA)

  • Can eliminate the acceptable risk of incorrect acceptance by auditing the entire population
  • Recall the audit risk model
  • AR = IR x CR x AP x ARIA
  • ARIA =
slide9

RF

Always used

Reliability Factors for Misstatements of Overstatements

slide10
8. Specify Anticipated Misstatement (AM) and Expansion Factor (EF)
  • Anticipated misstatement
    • For Athens Corporation?
slide11
The expansion factor (EF)
  • What is the expansion factor for anticipated misstatement and why?
slide12

Sample size

(n)

=

Book value (BV)

x

Reliability factor (RF) for risk of overstatement

Tolerable misstatement (TM)

-

Anticipated Misstatement (AM)

x

Expansion factor for anticipated misstatement (EF)

n =

x

-

x

9. Determine the sample size

  • Auditors can use the following formula:

n =

slide14

Sampling Interval

=

Book value of the population (BV) Sample size (n)

10. Select Sample

  • Sampling interval
  • Systematic sampling
slide15

What is the sampling interval?

  • BV/n =
  • Must now identify customer account numbers
    • Also called logical sampling units
  • The auditor decides to use systematic sampling
slide17
Assume auditor selects 9832 with a random stab
    • From where?
  • Which account balance should we select?
  • What is the sampling interval?
  • Thus what is the next account?
slide19
11. Perform the audit procedures
  • Appropriate procedures that are appropriate for the circumstances
  • What is the appropriate procedure?
slide20

Allowance for sampling risk

Upper misstatement limit

Projected misstatement

Basic precision

Incremental allowance

=

+

+

  • Upper misstatement limit

12. Generalize from the sample to the population

slide21

(a) Computing Projected Misstatements

  • What is projected misstatement?
  • The tainting percentage
slide22

Tainting percentage

Book value – Audited value

Sampling interval

Project misstatement for each audited item

x

=

Book value

  • For logical sampling units less than the sampling interval
  • For logical sampling units greater than or equal to the sampling interval

Book value – Audited value = Projected misstatement for each audited item

slide23
Assume that for Athens Corporation three errors were found. Customer accounts 1491 and 1794 have book values less than the sampling interval, and customer account 1225 is larger than the sampling unit
slide24

(b) Computing Allowance for Sampling Risk

  • What is this allowance?
  • Two components
    • Basic precision
      • BP = RF x SI
slide25

Incremental allowance for sampling risk

  • Auditor must use reliability factors
slide26
For Athens Corporation accounts 1491 and 1794 were identified as including misstatements less than the sampling interval.
slide27

Allowance for sampling risk

Upper misstatement limit

Projected misstatement

Basic precision

Incremental allowance

=

+

+

Thus upper misstatement limit (UML) is

UML =

slide28

To evaluate results the auditor compares the estimate of upper misstatement limit with the tolerable misstatement

13. Evaluating results

  • From the results, the auditor for Athens Corporation may conclude with a 5% risk that the $2,400,000 book value is not overstated by more than $94,176.
  • What was the tolerable misstatement?
  • What is the final evaluation?
slide29

When upper misstatement limit exceeds the tolerable misstatement

    • What does this mean to valuation?
  • If the sample has no misstatements
    • UML = PM + BP + IA
slide30

Reaching a conclusion

  • Have to also look at qualitative aspects
  • Must evaluate whether misstatements are errors or irregularities

14. Decide the acceptability of the population

slide31

If upper misstatement limit exceeds the tolerable misstatement

    • Population is not acceptable
  • Some possible courses of action
slide32

Consider whether the projected amount of misstatement in the population based on the audit is greater than the amount anticipated when sample size was determined.

2. Consider whether the sample is representative of the population.

slide34

Advantages

1. Increases likelihood of including high-dollar value items

2. Easy to use

Advantages and Disadvantages of MUS Sampling

slide35

Disadvantages

1. Assumption is that the audited value of a sampling unit is neither less than zero nor greater then book value.

2. Upper misstatement limit.

3. Enables auditor to state a conclusion

slide36

Problem 16. MUS Sampling. Edwards has decided to use MUS sampling in the audit of a client’s accounts receivable balance. Few, if any, overstatements of account balance are expected. Edwards plans to use the following MUS sampling table:

Reliability Factors for Overstatement

  • Required:
  • Calculate the sampling interval and the sampling size Edwards should use, given the following information:
      • Tolerable misstatement $15,000
      • Risk of incorrect acceptance 5%
      • Number of misstatements allowed 0
      • Recorded amount of accounts receivable $300,000
slide37

Calculate the total projected misstatement if the following three misstatements were discovered in a MUS sample:

    • Recorded Amount Audited Amount Sampling Interval
    • ($) ($) ($)
      • 400 320 1,000
      • 500 0 1,000
      • 3,000 2,500 1,000
  • Does the book value present fairly?
slide38

Problem 2.MUS Sampling. Tim Dolan plans to use MUS sampling in auditing the Repairs and Maintenance account for Daco International to determine whether the accounts includes items that should be capitalized rather than expensed. Daco has recorded 2,000 invoices in arriving at the $800,000 expense for the year. Tim has decided to use $4,000 as the anticipated misstatement, and $50,000 as tolerable misstatement. After reviewing Tim’s work, the audit manager agreed with him that assessing control risk at 80 percent was appropriate. The manager indicated that the planned audit risk should be limited to 2 percent, inherent risk should be assessed to be 100 percent, and the risk that analytical procedures will not detect material misstatements should be assessed to be 50 percent.

  • Required:
    • Determine the required sample size and sampling interval.
    • Calculate the upper misstatement limit, assuming that the auditor tested the sample and discovered the following misstatements.
      • Voucher Number Book Value Audited Value
      • 0220-01 $ 2,400 $ 0
      • 0615-31 50 48
      • 0714-09 3,600 2,400
      • 1119-22 15,000 14,000