1 / 19

Tracking Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Funding Appeals: Preliminary Analysis

Tracking Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Funding Appeals: Preliminary Analysis. Conducted by IAWG Funding Studies Group Mihoko Tanabe, Kristen Schaus, Sonia Rastogi With Guidance from: Preeti Patel, Louise Lee-Jones and Catrin Schulte-Hillen. Objectives.

efrat
Download Presentation

Tracking Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Funding Appeals: Preliminary Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tracking Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Funding Appeals: Preliminary Analysis Conducted by IAWG Funding Studies Group Mihoko Tanabe, Kristen Schaus, Sonia Rastogi With Guidance from: Preeti Patel, Louise Lee-Jones and Catrin Schulte-Hillen

  2. Objectives To examine for the 2002-2012 period: • To what extent have agencies appealed to implement various RH activities in humanitarian health and protection appeals? • To what extent have the appeals been funded?

  3. Methods Honed methods used in tracking of RH proposals from the WRC/Save the Children/UNHCR/UNFPA ASRH Report. Extracted publicly available data from OCHA’s financial tracking system: “E. List of Appeal Projects (grouped by Cluster) with funding status of each”. Systematic review and categorization of each health and protection proposal via key word searches and analyses, especially of program activities and collected indicators.

  4. RH Classifications

  5. Schematic Cross-cutting: Adolescents (10-19 yrs) Elderly PWDs General RH Non-RH GBV MNH GBV MISP FP STIs/HIV

  6. Methods Duplicate proposals are included from revised appeals so as not to penalize emergencies where RH programming was removed due to changing needs, and to account for program evolution. Discretion made on activity categorization. In general, if “MISP” was mentioned, it was assumed that the agency implemented in its entirety. While many SRH activities overlap in their thematic categories, and integrated activities are recommended, activities are mutually exclusively categorized to prevent inflated and duplicative counts.

  7. 18 conflict-affected countries • Afghanistan • Angola • Burundi • Central African Rep. • Chad • Colombia, • Congo Dem. Rep. • Eritrea • Iraq • Liberia • Myanmar • Nepal • Sierra Leone • Somalia • Sri Lanka • Sudan • Timor-Leste • Uganda

  8. Findings for 2002 - 2012 • Total # launched appeals: 324 emergencies • Total # issued health and protection proposals: 10,280 • Total # health proposals: 6,596 • Total # protection proposals: 3,684

  9. Findings for 2002 and 2012 • 2002 • Total # health and protection proposals: 417 • Total # relevant RH proposals: 102 • Total # relevant RH proposals (health): 87 • Total # relevant RH proposals (protection): 15 • 2012 • Total # health and protection proposals: 908 • Total # relevant RH proposals: 359 • Total # relevant RH proposals (health): 266 • Total # relevant RH proposals (protection): 93

  10. Findings for 18 conflict-affected countries, 2002 and 2012 • 2002 • Total # issued health and protection proposals: 280 • Total # relevant RH proposals: 63 • Total # relevant RH proposals (health): 52 • Total # relevant RH proposals (protection): 11 • 2012 • Total # issued health and protection proposals: 308 • Total # relevant RH proposals: 145 • Total # relevant RH proposals (health): 109 • Total # relevant RH proposals (protection): 36

  11. Proportion of RH proposals among total sector proposals, 2002 and 2012 Percent All Proposals 2002 18 Conflict-Affected Countries 2012

  12. Components of RH proposals,2009-2012 Percent 2012 2011 2010 Year

  13. Full MISP proposals among total relevant RH proposals, 2009-2012 Percent 2011 2009 2010 2012 Year

  14. Partial MISP proposals among total relevant RH proposals, 2009-2012 Percent 2012 2011 2010 2009 Year

  15. Donorship for relevant RH proposals in 2002 and 2012 37.4% funded 34.1% funded Amount (USD) 31.6% funded 35.0% funded 18 Conflict- Affected 18 Conflict- Affected All All 2002 2012

  16. Preliminary observations (Takeaways) • Appealed amounts for RH programming was much less in 2002 than in 2012. • In 2002 and in 2012, less than 40% of RH proposals were funded. • The proportion of proposals implementing the full MISP has increased from 5% in 2010 to 12% in 2012. • Increases are noted for FP services and MNH in 2009-2012, while activities for HIV/AIDS decreased from 2010-2012. • FP services least descriptive among components of RH.

  17. Current limitations • Lack of access to detailed proposals from 2002-2008; full narratives only available from 2005. • Analysis is accurate in-so-far as agencies report their planned activities; some RH-related activities may be missing. • Inability to link donorship to exact proposals limits disaggregation of contributions per donor. • Possible over-estimation of unmet need (USD), given inclusion of original and revised appeals. • Analysis based on desk research and not a reflection of actual programming.

  18. Next steps • Analyze data for 2003-2008; detailed analysis of RH components contingent upon data received from FTS. • Develop article for Conflict and Health, referencing ODA article.

  19. Acknowledgements • Sandra Krause, WRC • Dhabie Brown, Leah Petit, former WRC interns • Miriam Lange, Luciano Natale, OCHA FTS Thank You!

More Related