1 / 32

Classroom Assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day

Classroom Assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day. Dylan Wiliam www.dylanwiliam.net. Overview of presentation. Why raising achievement is important Why investing in teachers is the answer Why formative assessment should be the focus

edythe
Download Presentation

Classroom Assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Classroom Assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day Dylan Wiliam www.dylanwiliam.net

  2. Overview of presentation • Why raising achievement is important • Why investing in teachers is the answer • Why formative assessment should be the focus • Why teacher learning communities should be the mechanism • How we can put this into practice

  3. Raising achievement matters • For individuals • Increased lifetime salary • Improved health • Longer life • For society • Lower criminal justice costs • Lower health-care costs • Increased economic growth

  4. Where’s the solution? • Structure • Smaller high schools • K-8 schools • Alignment • Curriculum reform • Textbook replacement • Governance • Charter schools • Vouchers • Technology • Computers • Interactive white-boards

  5. School effectiveness • Three generations of school effectiveness research • Raw results approaches • Different schools get different results • Conclusion: Schools make a difference • Demographic-based approaches • Demographic factors account for most of the variation • Conclusion: Schools don’t make a difference • Value-added approaches • School-level differences in value-added are relatively small • Classroom-level differences in value-added are large • Conclusion: An effective school is a school full of effective classrooms

  6. How important is teacher quality? • How much progress will an average student make when taught by a great teacher (i.e., the best teacher in a group of 50)? • An extra month per year • An extra two months per year • An extra three months per year • An extra four months per year • An extra six months per year

  7. Teacher quality • A labor force issue with 2 solutions • Replace existing teachers with better ones? • No evidence that more pay brings in better teachers • No evidence that there are better teachers out there deterred by burdensome certification requirements • Improve the effectiveness of existing teachers • The “love the one you’re with” strategy • It can be done • We know how to do it, but at scale? Quickly? Sustainably?

  8. Advanced content matter knowledge • <5% • Pedagogical content knowledge • 10-15% • Further professional qualifications (NBPTS) • <5% • Total “explained” difference • 20-25% The ‘dark matter’ of teacher quality • Teachers make a difference • But what makes the difference in teachers?

  9. Cost/effect comparisons

  10. The research evidence • Several major reviews of the research • Natriello (1987) • Crooks (1988) • Kluger & DeNisi (1996) • Black & Wiliam (1998) • Nyquist (2003) • All find consistent, substantial effects

  11. Types of formative assessment • Long-cycle • Span: across units, terms • Length: four weeks to one year • Impact: Student monitoring; curriculum alignment • Medium-cycle • Span: within and between teaching units • Length: one to four weeks • Impact: Improved, student-involved, assessment; teacher cognition about learning • Short-cycle • Span: within and between lessons • Length: • day-by-day: 24 to 48 hours • minute-by-minute: 5 seconds to 2 hours • Impact: classroom practice; student engagement

  12. Unpacking formative assessment • Key processes • Establishing where the learners are in their learning • Establishing where they are going • Working out how to get there • Participants • Teachers • Peers • Learners

  13. Aspects of formative assessment

  14. Sharing learning intentions • Explaining learning intentions at start of lesson/unit • Learning intentions • Success criteria • Intentions/criteria in students’ language • Posters of key words to talk about learning • eg describe, explain, evaluate • Planning/writing frames • Annotated examples of different standards to ‘flesh out’ assessment rubrics (e.g. lab reports) • Opportunities for students to design their own tests

  15. Eliciting evidence of achievement • Key idea: questioning should • cause thinking • provide data that informs teaching • Improving teacher questioning • generating questions with colleagues • closed vs. open or low-order vs. high-order • appropriate wait-time • Getting away from I-R-E • basketball rather than serial table-tennis • ‘No hands up’ (except to ask a question) • ‘Hot Seat’ questioning • All-student response systems • ABCD cards, Mini white-boards, Exit passes

  16. Feedback that moves learning on • Key idea: feedback should • cause thinking • provide guidance on how to improve • Comment-only grading • Focused grading • Explicit reference to mark-schemes and scoring guides • Suggestions on how to improve • ‘Strategy cards’ ideas for improvement • Not giving complete solutions • Re-timing assessment • (eg two-thirds-of-the-way-through-a-unit test)

  17. Students as owners of their learning • Students assessing their own work • with rubrics • with exemplars • Self-assessment of understanding • Traffic lights • Red/green discs • Colored cups

  18. Students as instructional resources • Students assessing their peers’ work • “pre-flight check-list” • “two stars and a wish” • Training students to pose questions/identifying group weaknesses • End-of-lesson students’ review

  19. …and one big idea • Use evidence about learning to adapt teaching and learning to meet student needs

  20. Keeping Learning on Track (KLT) • A pilot guides a plane or boat toward its destination by taking constant readings and making careful adjustments in response to wind, currents, weather, etc. • A KLT teacher does the same: • Plans a carefully chosen route ahead of time (in essence building the track) • Takes readings along the way • Changes course as conditions dictate

  21. Putting it into practice

  22. Implementing FA/AfL requires changing teacher habits • Teachers “know” most of this already • So the problem is not a lack of knowledge • It’s a lack of understanding what it means to do FA/AfL • That’s why telling teachers what to do doesn’t work • Experience alone is not enough—if it were, then the most experienced teachers would be the best teachers—we know that’s not true (Hanushek, 2005; Day, 2006) • People need to reflect on their experiences in systematic ways that build their accessible knowledge base, learn from mistakes, etc. (Bransford, Brown & Cocking, 1999)

  23. A model for teacher learning • Content, then process • Content (what we want teachers to change) • Evidence • Ideas (strategies and techniques) • Process (how to go about change) • Choice • Flexibility • Small steps • Accountability • Support

  24. Strategies and techniques • Distinction between strategies and techniques • Strategies define the territory of AfL (no brainers) • Teachers are responsible for choice of techniques • Allows for customization/ caters for local context • Creates ownership • Shares responsibility • Key requirements of techniques • embodiment of deep cognitive/affective principles • relevance • feasibility • acceptability

  25. Teacher learning takes time • To put new knowledge to work, to make it meaningful and accessible when you need it, requires practice. • A teacher doesn’t come at this as a blank slate. • Not only do teachers have their current habits and ways of teaching—they’ve lived inside the old culture of classrooms all their lives: every teacher started out as a student! • New knowledge doesn’t just have to get learned and practiced, it has to go up against long-established, familiar, comfortable ways of doing things that may not be as effective, but fit within everyone’s expectations of how a classroom should work. • It takes time and practice to undo old habits and become graceful at new ones. Thus… • Professional development must be sustained over time

  26. That’s what teacher learning communities (TLCs) are for: • TLCs contradict teacher isolation • TLCs reprofessionalize teaching by valuing teacher expertise • TLCs deprivatize teaching so that teachers’ strengths and struggles become known • TLCs offer a steady source of support for struggling teachers • They grow expertise by providing a regular space, time, and structure for that kind of systematic reflecting on practice • They facilitate sharing of untapped expertise residing in individual teachers • They build the collective knowledge base in a school

  27. How to set up a TLC • Plan that the TLC will run for two years • Identify 8 to 10 interested colleagues • Should have similar assignments (e.g. early years, math/sci) • Secure institutional support for: • Monthly meetings (75 to 120 minutes each, inside or outside school time) • Time between meetings (2 hrs per month in school time) • Collaborative planning • Peer observation • Any necessary waivers from school policies

  28. A ‘signature pedagogy’ for teacher learning? • Every monthly TLC meeting should follows the same structure and sequence of activities Activity 1: Introduction & Housekeeping (5-10 minutes) Activity 2: How’s It Going (35-50 minutes) Activity 3: New Learning about AfL (20-45 minutes) Activity 4: Personal Action Planning (10 minutes) Activity 5: Summary of Learning (5 minutes)

  29. The TLC leader’s role • To ensure the TLC meets regularly • To ensure all needed materials are at meetings • To ensure that each meeting is focused on AfL • To create and maintain a productive and non-judgmental tone during meetings • To ensure that every participant shares with regard to their implementation of AfL • To encourage teachers to provide their colleagues with constructive and thoughtful feedback • To encourage teachers to think about and discuss the implementation of new AfL learning and skills • To ensure that every teacher has an action plan to guide their next steps • But not to be the AfL “expert”

  30. Peer observation • Run to the agenda of the observed, not the observer • Observed teacher specifies focus of observation • Observe teacher specifies what counts as evidence • e.g., teacher wants to increase wait-time • provides observer with a stop-watch to log wait-times

  31. Implementations • Current pilots in: • Cleveland Municipal School District, OH • Austin Independent School District, TX • Chico Unified School District, CA • Mathematics and Science Partnership of Greater Philadelphia, PA/NJ • St. Mary’s County Public Schools, MD • State-wide pilot in 10 schools in Vermont • Further details: www.ets.org/klt

  32. Summary • Raising achievement is important • Raising achievement requires improving teacher quality • Improving teacher quality requires teacher professional development • To be effective, teacher professional development must address • What teachers do in the classroom • How teachers change what they do in the classroom • AfL/FA + TLCs • A point of (uniquely?) high leverage • A “Trojan Horse” into wider issues of pedagogy, psychology, and curriculum

More Related