20 likes | 125 Views
The Toledo mandate emphasizes the need for a transparent and free Resource Flow Security Checker (RFSC) for cities and municipalities, managed by public authorities. Key areas for future success include protecting the RFSC, establishing a legal framework, ensuring technical security, managing its functions properly, monitoring usage, promoting it, and engaging partners. This effort requires commitment from central governments, national city organizations, and possibly test cities. The conclusion of the testing phase should focus on the future, with necessary tasks to enable broader use of the tool by interested parties.
E N D
What is necessary for the future ? Toledo mandate : “The RFSC should be a transparent tool, free of charge for cities and municipalities, prepared and run by public authorities…” • Protection of the RFSC • Appropriate legal framework • Technical security • Management of the RFSC • Proper and ongoing functioning • Administration and monitoring of the use • Dissemination and Promotion of the RFSC • Commitment and involvement of partners • Central government administrations • National cities organisations, NSG (?) • Special role for test cities ?
What shall be done ? • Conclusion of the testing phase :”there should be a future” • Necessary tasks to ensure that the tool can be used by interested cities and municipalities :